[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Any problems posting to this list? please respond

Looks like I received the same emails that Brian did.

The two I received (Kansas City Royals Time, aka CDT):

From: owner-cve-editorial-board-list@lists.mitre.org <owner-cve-editorial-board-list@lists.mitre.org> on behalf of Landfield, Kent <Kent_Landfield@McAfee.com>
Sent: Friday, August 28, 2015 12:58 PM
To: cve-editorial-board-list@LISTS.MITRE.ORG
Subject: FW: NTIA announces first meeting on Vulnerability Disclosure 

From: owner-cve-editorial-board-list@lists.mitre.org <owner-cve-editorial-board-list@lists.mitre.org> on behalf of jericho <jericho@attrition.org>
Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2015 1:14 AM
To: cve-editorial-board-list
Subject: current guidelines for a CNA


Regards,
kw

________________________________________
From: owner-cve-editorial-board-list@lists.mitre.org <owner-cve-editorial-board-list@lists.mitre.org> on behalf of jericho <jericho@attrition.org>
Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2015 10:35 PM
To: Christey, Steven M.
Cc: cve-editorial-board-list
Subject: Re: Any problems posting to this list? please respond

: 1. Starting Friday August 28, has anybody received posts to this list
: from Brian Martin (Jericho) and Kent Landfield?  Kent, did you see
: Brian's posts?  Brian, did you see Kent's post?

I received Kent's mail.

I did not receive my "Re: procedure for penalizing or revoking CNA
status?" mail.

I did not receive my follow-up made shortly after.

I did receive my "current guidelines for a CNA" mail.

So 50/50 on receiving...

: 2. Did anybody receive this message?

And this one obviously.

: Brian's implication seems very clear, namely, that MITRE would prevent
: his posts from being sent to the Board list and/or being archived. As
: long as I have been the primary person responsible for configuration of
: the CVE Editorial Board list, beginning in spring 1999, I have always
: given Board members unmoderated/unlimited posting privileges to this
: list.  Any implication that I would intentionally moderate this list or
: restrict posts to Board members is incorrect.

I apologize for that. Based on what I saw, it seemed clear at the time
that some type of moderation was at play, primarily due to the inflamatory
nature of my post that did not go through, as compared to my tame question
post that did.

.b
Page Last Updated or Reviewed: September 01, 2015