Re: Final Draft?
Time delays in my access to email have kept me lurking to date, but I want to add my support. I like this letter very much.
Dave Mann wrote:
> Gene Spafford wrote:
> > The word "since" means "time since" and not causality.
> Great catch!!!
> New Changes:
> * Replaced the word "since" as suggested
> - see aragraphs 2 and 5
> * Further strengthened 2nd sentance in 2nd paragraph
> - replaced "the education of ... specialists may be hindered"
> with "the education of ... specialists will be hindered"
> Spaf offered:
> > I do not believe the letter needs to be further shortened. I think
> > it is ready to go.
> I agree.
> Dave Mann || e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Senior Security Analyst || phone: 508-485-7737 x254
> BindView Corporation || fax: 508-485-0737
> As leading security practitioners, educators, vendors, and users of
> information security, we wish to register our misgivings about the
> Council of Europe draft treaty on Crime in Cyberspace.
> We are concerned that portions of the proposed treaty may result in
> criminalizing techniques and software commonly used to make computer
> systems resistant to attack. Signatory states passing legislation to
> implement the treaty may endanger the security of their computer
> systems because computer users in those countries will not be able to
> adequately protect their computer systems and the education of
> information protection specialists will be hindered.
> Critical to the protection of computer systems and infrastructure is
> the ability to
> * Test software for weaknesses
> * Verify the presence of defects in computer systems
> * Exchange vulnerability information
> System administrators, researchers, consultants and companies all
> routinely develop, use, and share software designed to exercise known
> and suspected vulnerabilities. Academic institutions use these
> tools to educate students and in research to develop improved
> defenses. Our combined experience suggests that it is impossible
> to reliably distinguish software used in computer crime from that
> used for these legitimate purposes. In fact, they are often
> Currently, article 6 of the draft treaty is vague regarding the use,
> distribution, and possession of software that could be used to
> violate the security of computer systems. We agree that damaging or
> breaking into computer systems is wrong and we unequivocally support
> laws against such inappropriate behavior. We affirm that a goal of the
> treaty and resulting legislation should be to permit the development
> and application of good security measures. However, legislation that
> criminalizes security software development, distribution and use
> is counter to that goal, as it would adversely impact security
> practitioners, researchers, and educators.
> Therefore, we respectfully request that the treaty drafters remove
> section a.1 from article 6, and modify section b accordingly; the
> articles on computer intrusion and damage (viz., articles 1-5) are
> already sufficient to proscribe any improper use of security-related
> software or information.
> Please do not hesitate to call on us for technical advice in your
> future deliberations.
> "Organizational affiliations are listed for identification purposes
> only, and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the
> affiliated organization."
org:The MITRE Corporation
adr:;;1820 Dolley Madison Blvd;McLean;VA;22102;
S/MIME Cryptographic Signature