Re: [CVEPRI] March 9-10 Editorial Board Meeting Summary

• To: <cve-editorial-board-list@lists.mitre.org>
• Subject: Re: [CVEPRI] March 9-10 Editorial Board Meeting Summary
• From: Pascal Meunier <pmeunier@purdue.edu>
• Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2000 14:35:44 -0500
• Delivery-Date: Tue Mar 14 14:28:12 2000
• In-Reply-To: <4.1.20000314121251.009d3b30@dorsai.cerias.purdue.edu>
• References: <200003140208.VAA25060@basie.mitre.org> <200003140208.VAA25060@basie.mitre.org> <4.1.20000314094925.009ce580@dorsai.cerias.purdue.edu> <4.1.20000314121251.009d3b30@dorsai.cerias.purdue.edu>
• Sender: owner-cve-editorial-board-list@lists.mitre.org

>At 10:17 AM 3/14/00 , Andy wrote:

>>We also considered things
>>like ICQ, which is in permanent beta. We basically agreed that mere beta
>>status is not a reason to exclude things from the CVE. The main criteria for
>>inclusion would include length of life and wideness of availability. This
>>does not mean we have to include every security bug in every short-lived
>>"true" beta.
>>
>>Hope this clears things up.

Yes, that makes sense, thanks.
Pascal

• References:
  • [CVEPRI] March 9-10 Editorial Board Meeting Summary
    • From: "Steven M. Christey" <coley@linus.mitre.org>
  • Re: [CVEPRI] March 9-10 Editorial Board Meeting Summary
    • From: Gene Spafford <spaf@cerias.purdue.edu>
  • Re: [CVEPRI] March 9-10 Editorial Board Meeting Summary
    • From: Gene Spafford <spaf@cerias.purdue.edu>

• Prev by Date: Re: [CVEPRI] March 9-10 Editorial Board Meeting Summary
• Next by Date: [INTERIM] ACCEPT 53 candidates from various clusters (Final 3/20)
• Prev by thread: Re: [CVEPRI] March 9-10 Editorial Board Meeting Summary
• Next by thread: [TECH] Candidates with enough votes - but no vendor confirmation!
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread