Methods for validating the current CVE

• To: cve-review@linus.mitre.org
• Subject: Methods for validating the current CVE
• From: "Steven M. Christey" <coley@linus.mitre.org>
• Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 15:34:31 -0400 (EDT)

All:

I like Russ' idea of reviewing the current CVE entries in the mailing
list, but there really is an awfully large number to deal with.
However, I think there are lots of entries where there should be no
(or little) debate.  We may be able to quickly agree on a relatively
large percentage of the current entries.  Still, 8 per day for a month
only covers about 35% of the vulnerabilities.

I believe there are probably about 50 to 100 entries that could be
"hot topics" or require some degree of change.  I could create a
default form and post a few "controversial candidates" per day to the
list.  What do people think?

- Steve

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Methods for validating the current CVE
    • From: Dave Mann <damann@mitre.org>

• Prev by Date: RE: Birds of Feather Meeting - Follow Up
• Next by Date: Candidate numbering scheme
• Prev by thread: RE: Birds of Feather Meeting - Follow Up
• Next by thread: Re: Methods for validating the current CVE
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread