RE: Second draft of CyberCrime Treaty Statement
> | 5) Each participating Board member performs their own outreach to
> | their own contacts, and works with the coordinator, who maintains
> | the "master list" of endorsements.
> I think that the contact list should be professionals, but question
> how wide we want to make it? Do we look for (say) 50 high profile
> people outside the board, or accept the potential of 5,000 signatures
> from bugtraq/ntbugtraq? I think that the latter is less compelling
> than the former.
I agree with this. If we open it to many, then we dilute the drafts potency.
Lets keep it to a small number of well respected members of the security