RE: Second draft of CyberCrime Treaty Statement
This is really starting to look nice! Amazing what can be done in short
We (not I) are participating in the G8 meeting as part of the U.S.
delegation lead by U.S. Dept. of Justice (any board members involved?). I
have kept all apprised of what the CVE board has been discussing, including
Spaf's latest editing, and have support for providing a "company" position,
but would be interested in getting a feel from G8 first as to how the draft
treaty is being perceived at that level if a "public" response can hold off
that long. Hope to get some ideas back that may help us 'fine-tune'.
From: Gene Spafford [mailto:spaf@CERIAS.PURDUE.EDU]
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2000 11:33 AM
To: Adam Shostack
Subject: Re: Second draft of CyberCrime Treaty Statement
Some comments embedded. Keep in mind that shorter is better.
At 10:58 AM -0400 5/10/00, Adam Shostack wrote:
>Dear <treaty drafters>