Re: Dot Notation Proposal WAS: Exploding CVE entries

• To: damann@mitre.org
• Subject: Re: Dot Notation Proposal WAS: Exploding CVE entries
• From: Gene Spafford <spaf@cs.purdue.edu>
• Date: Mon, 19 Jul 1999 21:08:12 -0500
• Cc: Pascal Meunier <pascalm@cup.hp.com>, cve-editorial-board-list@lists.mitre.org
• In-Reply-To: <37937919.4B8FD9B7@mitre.org>
• References: <v03130303b3b7f7dccfbe@[15.13.188.202]> <37937919.4B8FD9B7@mitre.org>
• Reply-To: spaf@cs.purdue.edu
• Sender: owner-cve-editorial-board-list@lists.mitre.org

Well, I like the approach, notwithstanding the complications.   I
have no idea how to resolve those, but I basically like the idea.

--spaf

• References:
  • Exploding CVE entries
    • From: Pascal Meunier <pascalm@cup.hp.com>
  • Dot Notation Proposal WAS: Exploding CVE entries
    • From: Dave Mann <damann@mitre.org>

• Prev by Date: Re: Dot Notation Proposal WAS: Exploding CVE entries
• Next by Date: Re: Dot Notation Proposal WAS: Exploding CVE entries
• Prev by thread: Re: Dot Notation Proposal WAS: Exploding CVE entries
• Next by thread: FINAL DECISION: ACCEPT 10 candidates from VEN-ROUTER cluster
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread