RE: Moving ahead

• To: "'Sheppard,Martin L.'" <sheppard@mitre.org>
• Subject: RE: Moving ahead
• From: Craig Ozancin <cozancin@axent.com>
• Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 12:05:35 -0400
• Cc: cve-review@linus.mitre.org

> I believe that the comment Adam makes regarding CAN-1999-0014 should
> mean that the description should be modified, not that the candidate
> should be rejected.  Rejected, in my mind, means that there is no
> vulnerability or that another CVE entry covers the vulnerability under
> consideration.   Do I understand the meaning of Rejected and Modify
> correctly?
> 

I agree with this definition. I believe that the definition needs
clarification. The vulnerability I believe is valid.

Craig

• Prev by Date: Re: Moving ahead
• Next by Date: Andre Frech's comments on CVE CERT candidate cluster
• Prev by thread: test - please respond
• Next by thread: Andre Frech's comments on CVE CERT candidate cluster
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread