Re: Proposal: CVE candidate/approved numbering scheme

• To: "CVE \(E-mail\)" <cve-review@linus.mitre.org>
• Subject: Re: Proposal: CVE candidate/approved numbering scheme
• From: Aleph One <aleph1@underground.org>
• Date: Wed, 19 May 1999 18:00:57 -0700
• In-Reply-To: <61143C10CC8AD211A2F10000F878E6830673D3@ns.rc.on.ca>; from Russ on Wed, May 19, 1999 at 07:49:30PM -0400
• References: <61143C10CC8AD211A2F10000F878E6830673D3@ns.rc.on.ca>

On Wed, May 19, 1999 at 07:49:30PM -0400, Russ wrote:
> 
> 2. There needs to be some mechanism for easily retrieving numerous
> CAN-numbers. (i.e. we do not want to have to repeatedly hit a "Submit"
> button on a web page to generate 10 numbers for reservation).

Just exactly why would you need CAN-numbers in bulk? The most vulnerabilities
I've ever seens any one organization publish in a single day has been
three or four.

> Cheers,
> Russ - NTBugtraq Editor

-- 
Aleph One / aleph1@underground.org
http://underground.org/
KeyID 1024/948FD6B5 
Fingerprint EE C9 E8 AA CB AF 09 61  8C 39 EA 47 A8 6A B8 01 

• References:
  • RE: Proposal: CVE candidate/approved numbering scheme
    • From: Russ <Russ.Cooper@rc.on.ca>

• Prev by Date: RE: Proposal: CVE candidate/approved numbering scheme
• Next by Date: RE: Proposal: CVE candidate/approved numbering scheme
• Prev by thread: RE: Proposal: CVE candidate/approved numbering scheme
• Next by thread: RE: Proposal: CVE candidate/approved numbering scheme
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread