|
|
CVE-ID | ||
---|---|---|
CVE-1999-0222 |
• CVSS Severity Rating • Fix Information • Vulnerable Software Versions • SCAP Mappings • CPE Information
|
|
Description | ||
Denial of service in Cisco IOS web server allows attackers to reboot the router using a long URL. | ||
References | ||
Note: References are provided for the convenience of the reader to help distinguish between vulnerabilities. The list is not intended to be complete. | ||
Assigning CNA | ||
MITRE Corporation | ||
Date Record Created | ||
19990607 | Disclaimer: The record creation date may reflect when the CVE ID was allocated or reserved, and does not necessarily indicate when this vulnerability was discovered, shared with the affected vendor, publicly disclosed, or updated in CVE. | |
Phase (Legacy) | ||
Proposed (19990714) | ||
Votes (Legacy) | ||
ACCEPT(1) Baker MODIFY(3) Frech, Levy, Shostack NOOP(3) Balinsky, Northcutt, Wall RECAST(1) Ziese REJECT(1) Christey |
||
Comments (Legacy) | ||
Shostack> I follow cisco announcements and problems pretty closely, and haven't seen this. Source? Frech> XF:cisco-web-crash Christey> XF:cisco-web-crash has no additional references. I can't find any references in Bugtraq or Cisco either. This bug is supposedly tested by at least one security product, but that product's database doesn't have any references either. So a question becomes, how did it make it into at least two security companies' databases? Levy> BUGTGRAQ: http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/60159 BID 1154 Ziese> The vulnerability is addressed by a vendor acknowledgement. This one, if recast to reflect that "...after using a long url..." should be replaced with "...A defect in multiple releases of Cisco IOS software will cause a Cisco router or switch to halt and reload if the IOS HTTP service is enabled, browsing to "http://router-ip/anytext?/" is attempted, and the enable password is supplied when requested. This defect can be exploited to produce a denial of service (DoS) attack." Then I can accept this and mark it as "Verfied by my Company". If it can't be recast because this (long uri) is diffferent then our release (special url construction). CHANGE> [Christey changed vote from REVIEWING to REJECT] Christey> Elias Levy's suggested reference is CVE-2000-0380. I don't think that Kevin's description is really addressing this either. The lack of references and a specific description make this candidate unusable, so it should be rejected. |
||
Proposed (Legacy) | ||
19990714 | ||
This is an record on the CVE List, which provides common identifiers for publicly known cybersecurity vulnerabilities. | ||
You can also search by reference using the CVE Reference Maps.
|
||
For More Information: CVE Request Web Form (select "Other" from dropdown) |