CVE-ID

CVE-1999-0222

• CVSS Severity Rating • Fix Information • Vulnerable Software Versions • SCAP Mappings • CPE Information
Description
Denial of service in Cisco IOS web server allows attackers to reboot the router using a long URL.
References
Note: References are provided for the convenience of the reader to help distinguish between vulnerabilities. The list is not intended to be complete.
Assigning CNA
MITRE Corporation
Date Record Created
19990607 Disclaimer: The record creation date may reflect when the CVE ID was allocated or reserved, and does not necessarily indicate when this vulnerability was discovered, shared with the affected vendor, publicly disclosed, or updated in CVE.
Phase (Legacy)
Proposed (19990714)
Votes (Legacy)
ACCEPT(1) Baker
MODIFY(3) Frech, Levy, Shostack
NOOP(3) Balinsky, Northcutt, Wall
RECAST(1) Ziese
REJECT(1) Christey
Comments (Legacy)
 Shostack> I follow cisco announcements and problems pretty closely, and haven't
   seen this.  Source?
 Frech> XF:cisco-web-crash
 Christey> XF:cisco-web-crash has no additional references.  I can't find
   any references in Bugtraq or Cisco either.  This bug is
   supposedly tested by at least one security product, but that
   product's database doesn't have any references either.  So
   a question becomes, how did it make it into at least two
   security companies' databases?
 Levy> BUGTGRAQ: http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/60159
   BID 1154
 Ziese> The vulnerability is addressed by a vendor acknowledgement.  This one, if
   recast to reflect that "...after using a long url..." should be replaced
   with
   "...A defect in multiple releases of Cisco IOS software will cause a Cisco
   router or switch to halt and reload if the IOS HTTP service is enabled,
   browsing to "http://router-ip/anytext?/" is attempted, and the enable
   password is supplied when requested. This defect can be exploited to produce
   a denial of service (DoS) attack."
   Then I can accept this and mark it as "Verfied by my Company".  If it can't
   be recast because this (long uri) is diffferent then our release (special
   url construction).
 CHANGE> [Christey changed vote from REVIEWING to REJECT]
 Christey> Elias Levy's suggested reference is CVE-2000-0380.
   I don't think that Kevin's description is really addressing
   this either.  The lack of references and a specific
   description make this candidate unusable, so it should be
   rejected.

Proposed (Legacy)
19990714
This is an record on the CVE List, which provides common identifiers for publicly known cybersecurity vulnerabilities.