[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Should be a CVE?

I agree.


Beverly M Finch, PMP
PSIRT Program Manager
Product Security Office

7001 Development Drive
Office 3N-C1
Morrisville, NC  27560

+1 919 294 5873

Twitter | Facebook | Instagram | Blogs | Forums

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-cve-editorial-board-list@lists.mitre.org 
[mailto:owner-cve-editorial-board-list@lists.mitre.org] On Behalf Of 
Waltermire, David A. (Fed)
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2017 3:20 PM
To: cve-editorial-board-list@lists.mitre.org
Subject: Should be a CVE?

Looking at the following, it appears that a CVE was issued for the 
potential that someone might upgrade software to a vulnerable version, 
which has another CVE. I don't think this should qualify as a CVE, 
given the actual vulnerability already has one. 


Should this CVE be rejected?


Page Last Updated or Reviewed: September 12, 2017