|
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
CVE For Services
- To: cve-editorial-board-list <cve-editorial-board-list@lists.mitre.org>
- Subject: CVE For Services
- From: "Andy Balinsky (balinsky)" <balinsky@cisco.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 03:02:18 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- Authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is 129.83.29.2) smtp.mailfrom=LISTS.MITRE.ORG; mitre.mail.onmicrosoft.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;mitre.mail.onmicrosoft.com; dmarc=fail action=none header.from=cisco.com;
- Delivery-date: Wed Sep 6 07:43:28 2017
- List-help: <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTS.MITRE.ORG?body=INFO%20CVE-EDITORIAL-BOARD-LIST>
- List-owner: <mailto:CVE-EDITORIAL-BOARD-LIST-request@LISTS.MITRE.ORG>
- List-subscribe: <mailto:CVE-EDITORIAL-BOARD-LIST-subscribe-request@LISTS.MITRE.ORG>
- List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CVE-EDITORIAL-BOARD-LIST-unsubscribe-request@LISTS.MITRE.ORG>
- Sender: <owner-cve-editorial-board-list@lists.mitre.org>
- Spamdiagnosticmetadata: 5952c28dcc454f0789fb433d26f936ef
- Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:2
- Thread-index: AQHTJryNBc/EEwip20OumxD/xTMPsw==
- Thread-topic: CVE For Services
|
I plan to bring up discussion of this topic at tomorrow's board meeting. It lead to a healthy online discussion, but has languished for 6 months. Whether we make a change to the INC3 rule or not, we need to do so deliberately, not by neglect of discussion.
Thanks,
|
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: CVE For Services
- From: "kseifried@redhat.com" <kseifried@redhat.com>
- Re: CVE For Services
- Prev by Date: CVE Board Meeting Summary - 23 August 2017
- Next by Date: Re: CVE For Services
- Previous by thread: CVE Board Meeting Summary - 23 August 2017
- Next by thread: Re: CVE For Services
- Index(es):