[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Microsoft CNA assignment issues for April

There is an error on the page and we are working to resolve that as 
soon as possible

Thanks,
  Elizabeth

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-cve-editorial-board-list@lists.mitre.org 
[mailto:owner-cve-editorial-board-list@lists.mitre.org] On Behalf Of 
jericho
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 11:35 AM
To: CVE Editorial Board <cve-editorial-board-list@lists.mitre.org>
Subject: Microsoft CNA assignment issues for April
Importance: High

All,

Microsoft has assigned a single CVE to cover "all April Adobe Flash 
updates" apparently:

https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fportal.msrc.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fsecurity-guidance%2Facknowledgments&data=02%7C01%7Cbethsco%40MICROSOFT.COM%7Cc1b35f6aa74149f6e0e608d4810b0769%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636275331747906495&sdata=DnwwK%2BOpQGzS%2F17hjuq3h9xumC7unQQ3qXkhhz0Zm6k%3D&reserved=0

    April Flash Security Update         2017-3447

Which links to
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cve.mitre.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fcvename.cgi%3Fname%3D2017-3447&data=02%7C01%7Cbethsco%40MICROSOFT.COM%7Cc1b35f6aa74149f6e0e608d4810b0769%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636275331747906495&sdata=Yd0K6p2rV4xc92SlYIWG3IMSbjNY1Cs6JHwVubeTLBM%3D&reserved=0.

Further, there is a single ID to cover "defense-in-depth" updates for a
product:

    Defense-in-Depth Update for Microsoft Office        2017-2605

Which links to
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cve.mitre.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fcvename.cgi%3Fname%3D2017-2605&data=02%7C01%7Cbethsco%40MICROSOFT.COM%7Cc1b35f6aa74149f6e0e608d4810b0769%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636275331747906495&sdata=J2OKKHb77Etk4i8eu%2BCQ7lQsNqH9EpgXwSPRAUvNdP0%3D&reserved=0

I am fairly confident that 2017-3447 is not a proper assignment and 
does not follow the CNA guidelines, about assigning IDs to another 
vendor's products (and that vendor happens to be a CNA themselves). 
We've seen this done in the past with Oracle as well.

I'd also be surprised if a single ID assignment for multiple 
defense-in-depth enhancements meets the criteria of a CVE ID, since DiD 
enhancements generally do not mean there is a crossing of privilege 
boundaries, and therefore not vulnerabilities.

Could Microsoft and MITRE chime in on these please?

Brian
Page Last Updated or Reviewed: April 12, 2017