[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Regarding USCYBERCOM



CYBERCOM will surely NOT want DHS to represent them.    They are entirely different organizations with different missions and focus areas.    Reps from both would be a good idea. 

 

Thank you,  

Scott

703-509-9330

 

 

From: <owner-cve-editorial-board-list@lists.mitre.org> on behalf of Kurt Seifried <kseifried@redhat.com>
Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 at 11:54 PM
To: "Millar, Thomas" <Thomas.Millar@hq.dhs.gov>
Cc: "Landfield, Kent B" <kent.b.landfield@intel.com>, cve-editorial-board-list <cve-editorial-board-list@lists.mitre.org>
Subject: Re: Regarding USCYBERCOM

 

I honestly have no idea how the US gov works (or my own gov, or really any gov for that matter). If USCYBERCOM is happy to have DHS represent them on the CVE Board that's fine by me. I was just assuming they may want to take an active role.

 

On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Millar, Thomas <Thomas.Millar@hq.dhs.gov> wrote:

I'm not anointing anyone, I'm just going to find out who to talk to, via our liaisons with them.

IME, If it's anything like every other vulnerability-related item with DoD, they will be super happy to let DHS continue as their trustee.



Tom Millar, US-CERT

Sent from +1-202-631-1915
https://www.us-cert.gov

 


From: Landfield, Kent B
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 7:26:06 PM
To: Millar, Thomas
Cc: Kurt Seifried; cve-editorial-board-list
Subject: Re: Regarding USCYBERCOM

 

Can we talk about this before we anoint someone?

 

Personally I do not believe we should be adding board members based on news articles. Let's see how it goes first and then if it makes sense, do it. 

 

What would be the international repercussions by doing this? We want CVE as a global vulnerability identification means, not just a US one. 

 

At this point we have not had the preliminary discussions to tie ourselves to aa org such as this. Let's have those first...

Kent Landfield

Intel Corporation 


On Aug 10, 2016, at 1:18 PM, Millar, Thomas <Thomas.Millar@hq.dhs.gov> wrote:

I can reach out



Tom Millar, US-CERT

Sent from +1-202-631-1915
https://www.us-cert.gov

 


From: owner-cve-editorial-board-list@lists.mitre.org on behalf of Kurt Seifried
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 6:39:15 PM
To: cve-editorial-board-list
Subject: Regarding USCYBERCOM

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-cyber-idUSKCN10G254

 

I'm guessing we want to have them on the board, do we have anyone there we can reach out to? 

 

--
Kurt Seifried -- Red Hat -- Product Security -- Cloud
PGP A90B F995 7350 148F 66BF 7554 160D 4553 5E26 7993
Red Hat Product Security contact: 
secalert@redhat.com



 

--

 

--
Kurt Seifried -- Red Hat -- Product Security -- Cloud
PGP A90B F995 7350 148F 66BF 7554 160D 4553 5E26 7993
Red Hat Product Security contact: 
secalert@redhat.com


Page Last Updated or Reviewed: August 17, 2016