[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Sources: Full and Partial Coverage
- To: "Mann, Dave" <damann@mitre.org>
- Subject: Re: Sources: Full and Partial Coverage
- From: Art Manion <amanion@cert.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 17:57:03 -0400
- CC: cve-editorial-board-list <cve-editorial-board-list@LISTS.MITRE.ORG>
- Delivery-Date: Tue Jun 26 17:58:52 2012
- In-Reply-To: <2F43C4D2BE8AD24C8AC17D8C64B379B316BE3E@IMCMBX01.MITRE.ORG>
- List-Help: <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTS.MITRE.ORG?body=INFO%20CVE-EDITORIAL-BOARD-LIST>
- List-Owner: <mailto:CVE-EDITORIAL-BOARD-LIST-request@LISTS.MITRE.ORG>
- List-Subscribe: <mailto:CVE-EDITORIAL-BOARD-LIST-subscribe-request@LISTS.MITRE.ORG>
- List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:CVE-EDITORIAL-BOARD-LIST-unsubscribe-request@LISTS.MITRE.ORG>
- OpenPGP: id=36C268A3
- References: <2F43C4D2BE8AD24C8AC17D8C64B379B316BE3E@IMCMBX01.MITRE.ORG>
- Sender: <owner-cve-editorial-board-list@LISTS.MITRE.ORG>
- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1
On 5/4/12 5:59 PM, Mann, Dave wrote: > SHOULD BE FULLY COVERED > ----------------------- This might already be addressed, but all CNAs should be fully covered. Presumably, a CNA is doing a decent job and a CVE from a CNA doesn't need as much analysis and shakedown time? I believe CVE already gives higher priority to CVE IDs that have been reserved for CNA use when those IDs show up in public disclosures? - Art
- Prev by Date: RE: Sources: Full and Partial Coverage
- Next by Date: Sources List and Some Updates
- Prev by thread: RE: Sources: Full and Partial Coverage
- Next by thread: Sources List and Some Updates
- Index(es):
