RE: [BOARD] Status of CyberCrime treaty statement

• To: David LeBlanc <dleblanc@microsoft.com>, "'Scott Blake'" <blake@BOS.BINDVIEW.COM>, cve-editorial-board-list@lists.mitre.org
• Subject: RE: [BOARD] Status of CyberCrime treaty statement
• From: "Marcus J. Ranum" <mjr@nfr.net>
• Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 09:51:02 -0400
• Delivery-Date: Tue Jun 27 09:55:32 2000
• In-Reply-To: <C183CC073051D31184DA0008C707BBF00CE1B3D2@RED-MSG-41>
• Sender: owner-cve-editorial-board-list@lists.mitre.org

>The treaty needs to EXPLICITLY allow for white hat activities and research.

That's also impossible to define such as not to allow loopholes.

mjr.

-----
Marcus J. Ranum
Chief Technology Officer, Network Flight Recorder, Inc.
Work:                  http://www.nfr.net
Personal:              http://pubweb.nfr.net/~mjr

• References:
  • RE: [BOARD] Status of CyberCrime treaty statement
    • From: David LeBlanc <dleblanc@microsoft.com>

• Prev by Date: RE: [BOARD] Status of CyberCrime treaty statement
• Next by Date: Re: [BOARD] Status of CyberCrime treaty statement
• Prev by thread: RE: [BOARD] Status of CyberCrime treaty statement
• Next by thread: RE: [BOARD] Status of CyberCrime treaty statement
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread