RE: Second draft of CyberCrime Treaty Statement

• To: "'Gene Spafford'" <spaf@cerias.purdue.edu>, Adam Shostack <adam@HOMEPORT.ORG>
• Subject: RE: Second draft of CyberCrime Treaty Statement
• From: Russ <Russ.Cooper@rc.on.ca>
• Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 13:35:54 -0400
• Cc: cve-editorial-board-list@lists.mitre.org
• Delivery-Date: Wed May 10 13:36:36 2000
• Sender: owner-cve-editorial-board-list@lists.mitre.org

This gets my vote!

Cheers,
Russ - NTBugtraq Editor
"dot-age" (as in "we're in the dot-age") = senility (source Webster's)

-----Original Message-----
From: Gene Spafford [mailto:spaf@CERIAS.PURDUE.EDU]
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2000 12:35 PM
To: Adam Shostack
Cc: cve-editorial-board-list@lists.mitre.org
Subject: Re: Second draft of CyberCrime Treaty Statement


Another point:

I would suggest that we get the letter put together from the
community of security practitioners and scholars, and not simply from
the CVE board.   Then, we open it up to allow others to "sign on".
We might get several hundred signatures if we do this right.

I would be happy to host & coordinate this if Mitre management
believes it inappropriate.   I did this before with the letter on
DCMA and got great response.

This also addresses the concern about whether the board endorses this
position or not -- we simply endorse it as individuals.

--spaf

• Prev by Date: Third SHORTENED Draft of CyberCrime Treaty Statement
• Next by Date: RE: Second draft of CyberCrime Treaty Statement
• Prev by thread: Re: 4th Draft of CyberCrime Treaty Statement
• Next by thread: RE: Second draft of CyberCrime Treaty Statement
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread