Re: Cybercrime treaty

• To: <cve-editorial-board-list@lists.mitre.org>
• Subject: Re: Cybercrime treaty
• From: "Andy Balinsky" <balinsky@cisco.com>
• Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 11:27:04 -0400
• Delivery-Date: Tue May 9 11:35:40 2000
• References: <200005031610.MAA22259@basie.mitre.org> <p04310117b53d56ccf700@[128.10.241.66]>
• Sender: owner-cve-editorial-board-list@lists.mitre.org

I, as an individual professional, definitely agree with coming out with a
statement that addresses the technical issues.  I also agree with Gene's
points about getting the larger community activated to express their
opinions, so it is not just a small group of geeks expressing the impact
that this will have on security research.  I also think that the more
succinct the statement the better, but that the lastest draft by Steve comes
pretty close to fitting the bill.

Andy

• References:
  • Re: Cybercrime treaty
    • From: "Steven M. Christey" <coley@linus.mitre.org>
  • Re: Cybercrime treaty
    • From: Gene Spafford <spaf@cerias.purdue.edu>

• Prev by Date: RE: Cybercrime treaty
• Next by Date: RE: CyberCrime Treaty Statement - draft text
• Prev by thread: RE: Cybercrime treaty
• Next by thread: RE: Cybercrime treaty
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread