• CVSS Severity Rating • Fix Information • Vulnerable Software Versions • SCAP Mappings • CPE Information
Buffer overflow in sar for OpenServer 5.0.5 allows local users to gain root privileges via a long -o parameter.
Note: References are provided for the convenience of the reader to help distinguish between vulnerabilities. The list is not intended to be complete.
Assigning CNA
MITRE Corporation
Date Record Created
20020611 Disclaimer: The record creation date may reflect when the CVE ID was allocated or reserved, and does not necessarily indicate when this vulnerability was discovered, shared with the affected vendor, publicly disclosed, or updated in CVE.
Phase (Legacy)
Proposed (20020830)
Votes (Legacy)
ACCEPT(4) Armstrong, Cole, Frech, Green
NOOP(3) Cox, Foat, Wall
REVIEWING(1) Christey
Comments (Legacy)
 Frech> It seems as if the BID-4089 assignment on this CAN name may be
   in error.
   BID-4089 (Multiple Vendor SNMP Request Handling Vulnerabilities) is
   already assigned to CVE-2002-0013. Also, this CVE issue seems to have
   nothing to do with SNMP.
 Christey> Agreed, this is the wrong BID.  SecurityFocus has assigned
   BID:643 to CVE-1999-1570, but there's a bit of an
   inconsistency.  BID:643 alludes to Bugtraq posts in 1999
   from Brock Tellier, mentioning overflows in sar via BOTH the
   -o and -f parameters.  However, they also link this issue to
   SCO advisory 99.17, although the advisory itself is too vague
   to *really* know what vulns they fixed.  And now the link
   to a potentially more detailed document (sse037.ltr)
   is broken.  So we don't have any independent reason for
   knowing whether SCO 99.17 (a) addresses any "sar"
   vulnerabilities, and (b) even if it does, whether it addresses
   *both* the -o and -f arguments originally claimed by Tellier.
   Finally, it seems rather curious that CSSA-2002-SCO.17
   talks about a -o overflow but does not mention -f.
   Sounds like an email to the security people at SCO
   is in order...
   OK.  Having consulted with SCO (who responded quickly), I
   looked even further into this issue.  There is now sufficient
   evidence that the -f overflow was fixed in 1999.  This
   means that a separate candidate should be created (by
   CD:SF-LOC), so the -f overflow is now covered by
   Need to DELREF BID:4089
 CHANGE> [Frech changed vote from NOOP to ACCEPT]
 CHANGE> [Christey changed vote from NOOP to REVIEWING]

Proposed (Legacy)
This is an record on the CVE List, which provides common identifiers for publicly known cybersecurity vulnerabilities.