|
|
Search Results
There are 1084 CVE Records that match your search.
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| CVE-2024-9410 | Ada.cx's Sentry configuration allowed for blind server-side request forgeries (SSRF) through the use of a data scraping endpoint. |
| CVE-2024-8977 | An issue has been discovered in GitLab EE affecting all versions starting from 15.10 prior to 17.2.9, from 17.3 prior to 17.3.5, and from 17.4 prior to 17.4.2. Instances with Product Analytics Dashboard configured and enabled could be vulnerable to SSRF attacks. |
| CVE-2024-7743 | A vulnerability was found in wanglongcn ltcms 1.0.20. It has been declared as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is the function downloadUrl of the file /api/file/downloadUrl of the component API Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument file leads to server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| CVE-2024-7740 | A vulnerability has been found in wanglongcn ltcms 1.0.20 and classified as critical. This vulnerability affects the function download of the file /api/test/download of the component API Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument url leads to server-side request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| CVE-2024-6937 | A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in formtools.org Form Tools 3.1.1. Affected is the function curl_exec of the file /admin/forms/option_lists/edit.php of the component Import Option List. The manipulation of the argument url leads to file inclusion. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-271992. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| CVE-2024-6763 | Eclipse Jetty is a lightweight, highly scalable, Java-based web server and Servlet engine . It includes a utility class, HttpURI, for URI/URL parsing. The HttpURI class does insufficient validation on the authority segment of a URI. However the behaviour of HttpURI differs from the common browsers in how it handles a URI that would be considered invalid if fully validated against the RRC. Specifically HttpURI and the browser may differ on the value of the host extracted from an invalid URI and thus a combination of Jetty and a vulnerable browser may be vulnerable to a open redirect attack or to a SSRF attack if the URI is used after passing validation checks. |
| CVE-2024-6587 | A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in berriai/litellm version 1.38.10. This vulnerability allows users to specify the `api_base` parameter when making requests to `POST /chat/completions`, causing the application to send the request to the domain specified by `api_base`. This request includes the OpenAI API key. A malicious user can set the `api_base` to their own domain and intercept the OpenAI API key, leading to unauthorized access and potential misuse of the API key. |
| CVE-2024-6586 | Lightdash version 0.1024.6 allows users with the necessary permissions, such as Administrator or Editor, to create and share dashboards. A dashboard that contains HTML elements which point to a threat actor controlled source can trigger an SSRF request when exported, via a POST request to /api/v1/dashboards//export. The forged request contains the value of the exporting user’s session token. A threat actor could obtain the session token of any user who exports the dashboard. The obtained session token can be used to perform actions as the victim on the application, resulting in session takeover. |
| CVE-2024-6524 | A vulnerability was found in ShopXO up to 6.1.0. It has been declared as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file extend/base/Uploader.php. The manipulation of the argument source leads to server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-270367. NOTE: The original disclosure confuses CSRF with SSRF. |
| CVE-2024-6095 | A vulnerability in the /models/apply endpoint of mudler/localai versions 2.15.0 allows for Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) and partial Local File Inclusion (LFI). The endpoint supports both http(s):// and file:// schemes, where the latter can lead to LFI. However, the output is limited due to the length of the error message. This vulnerability can be exploited by an attacker with network access to the LocalAI instance, potentially allowing unauthorized access to internal HTTP(s) servers and partial reading of local files. The issue is fixed in version 2.17. |
| CVE-2024-5885 | stangirard/quivr version 0.0.236 contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. The application does not provide sufficient controls when crawling a website, allowing an attacker to access applications on the local network. This vulnerability could allow a malicious user to gain access to internal servers, the AWS metadata endpoint, and capture Supabase data. |
| CVE-2024-5822 | A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the upload processing interface of gaizhenbiao/ChuanhuChatGPT versions <= ChuanhuChatGPT-20240410-git.zip. This vulnerability allows attackers to send crafted requests from the vulnerable server to internal or external resources, potentially bypassing security controls and accessing sensitive data. |
| CVE-2024-5736 | Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in AdmirorFrames Joomla! extension in afGdStream.php script allows to access local files or server pages available only from localhost. This issue affects AdmirorFrames: before 5.0. |
| CVE-2024-5526 | Grafana OnCall is an easy-to-use on-call management tool that will help reduce toil in on-call management through simpler workflows and interfaces that are tailored specifically for engineers. Grafana OnCall, from version 1.1.37 before 1.5.2 are vulnerable to a Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the webhook functionallity. This issue was fixed in version 1.5.2 |
| CVE-2024-5482 | A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the 'add_webpage' endpoint of the parisneo/lollms-webui application, affecting the latest version. The vulnerability arises because the application does not adequately validate URLs entered by users, allowing them to input arbitrary URLs, including those that target internal resources such as 'localhost' or '127.0.0.1'. This flaw enables attackers to make unauthorized requests to internal or external systems, potentially leading to access to sensitive data, service disruption, network integrity compromise, business logic manipulation, and abuse of third-party resources. The issue is critical and requires immediate attention to maintain the application's security and integrity. |
| CVE-2024-5328 | A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the lunary-ai/lunary application, specifically within the endpoint '/auth/saml/tto/download-idp-xml'. The vulnerability arises due to the application's failure to validate user-supplied URLs before using them in server-side requests. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by sending a specially crafted request to the affected endpoint, allowing them to make unauthorized requests to internal or external resources. This could lead to the disclosure of sensitive information, service disruption, or further attacks against the network infrastructure. The issue affects the latest version of the application as of the report. |
| CVE-2024-52598 | 2FAuth is a web app to manage Two-Factor Authentication (2FA) accounts and generate their security codes. Two interconnected vulnerabilities exist in version 5.4.1 a SSRF and URI validation bypass issue. The endpoint at POST /api/v1/twofaccounts/preview allows setting a remote URI to retrieve the image of a 2fa site. By abusing this functionality, it is possible to force the application to make a GET request to an arbitrary URL, whose content will be stored in an image file in the server if it looks like an image. Additionally, the library does some basic validation on the URI, attempting to filter our URIs which do not have an image extension. However, this can be easily bypassed by appending the string `#.svg` to the URI. The combination of these two issues allows an attacker to retrieve URIs accessible from the application, as long as their content type is text based. If not, the request is still sent, but the response is not reflected to the attacker. Version 5.4.1 fixes the issues. |
| CVE-2024-5186 | A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the file upload section of imartinez/privategpt version 0.5.0. This vulnerability allows attackers to send crafted requests that could result in unauthorized access to the local network and potentially sensitive information. Specifically, by manipulating the 'path' parameter in a file upload request, an attacker can cause the application to make arbitrary requests to internal services, including the AWS metadata endpoint. This issue could lead to the exposure of internal servers and sensitive data. |
| CVE-2024-51785 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in I Thirteen Web Solution Responsive Filterable Portfolio allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Responsive Filterable Portfolio: from n/a through 1.0.22. |
| CVE-2024-51665 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Noor alam Magical Addons For Elementor allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Magical Addons For Elementor: from n/a through 1.2.1. |
| CVE-2024-51408 | AppSmith Community 1.8.3 before 1.46 allows SSRF via New DataSource for application/json requests to 169.254.169.254 to retrieve AWS metadata credentials. |
| CVE-2024-51242 | A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability has been identified in eladmin 2.7 and earlier in ServerDeployController.java. The manipulation of the HTTP Body ip parameter leads to SSRF. |
| CVE-2024-50811 | hopetree izone lts c011b48 contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the active push function as \\apps\\tool\\apis\\bd_push.py does not securely filter user input through push_urls() and get_urls(). |
| CVE-2024-5015 | In WhatsUp Gold versions released before 2023.1.3, an authenticated SSRF vulnerability in Wug.UI.Areas.Wug.Controllers.SessionControler.Update allows a low privileged user to chain this SSRF with an Improper Access Control vulnerability. This can be used to escalate privileges to Admin. |
| CVE-2024-49521 | Adobe Commerce versions 3.2.5 and earlier are affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could lead to a security feature bypass. A low privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to send crafted requests from the vulnerable server to internal systems, which could result in the bypassing of security measures such as firewalls. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2024-4940 | An open redirect vulnerability exists in the gradio-app/gradio, affecting the latest version. The vulnerability allows an attacker to redirect users to arbitrary websites, which can be exploited for phishing attacks, Cross-site Scripting (XSS), Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), amongst others. This issue is due to improper validation of user-supplied input in the handling of URLs. Attackers can exploit this vulnerability by crafting a malicious URL that, when processed by the application, redirects the user to an attacker-controlled web page. |
| CVE-2024-49312 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in WisdmLabs Edwiser Bridge.This issue affects Edwiser Bridge: from n/a through 3.0.7. |
| CVE-2024-48951 | An issue was discovered in Logpoint before 7.5.0. Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) on SOAR can be used to leak Logpoint's API Token leading to authentication bypass. |
| CVE-2024-4894 | ITPison OMICARD EDM fails to properly filter specific URL parameter, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to modify the parameters and conduct Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attacks. This vulnerability enables attackers to probe internal network information. |
| CVE-2024-4851 | A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the stangirard/quivr application, version 0.0.204, which allows attackers to access internal networks. The vulnerability is present in the crawl endpoint where the 'url' parameter can be manipulated to send HTTP requests to arbitrary URLs, thereby facilitating SSRF attacks. The affected code is located in the backend/routes/crawl_routes.py file, specifically within the crawl_endpoint function. This issue could allow attackers to interact with internal services that are accessible from the server hosting the application. |
| CVE-2024-48360 | Qualitor v8.24 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the component /request/viewValidacao.php. |
| CVE-2024-48346 | xtreme1 <= v0.9.1 contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the /api/data/upload path. The vulnerability is triggered through the fileUrl parameter, which allows an attacker to make arbitrary requests to internal or external systems. |
| CVE-2024-48234 | An issue was discovered in mipjz 5.0.5. In the push method of app\tag\controller\ApiAdminTag.php the value of the postAddress parameter is not processed and is directly passed into curl_exec execution and output, resulting in Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that can read server files. |
| CVE-2024-48232 | An issue was found in mipjz 5.0.5. In the mipPost method of \app\setting\controller\ApiAdminTool.php, the value of the postAddress parameter is not processed and is directly passed into curl_exec execution and output, resulting in a Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that can read server files. |
| CVE-2024-48178 | newbee-mall v1.0.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the goodsCoverImg parameter. |
| CVE-2024-48107 | SparkShop <=1.1.7 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This vulnerability allows attacks to scan ports on the Intranet or local network where the server resides, attack applications running on the Intranet or local network, or read metadata on the cloud server. |
| CVE-2024-48052 | In gradio <=4.42.0, the gr.DownloadButton function has a hidden server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. The reason is that within the save_url_to_cache function, there are no restrictions on the URL, which allows access to local target resources. This can lead to the download of local resources and sensitive information. |
| CVE-2024-47590 | An unauthenticated attacker can create a malicious link which they can make publicly available. When an authenticated victim clicks on this malicious link, input data will be used by the web site page generation to create content which when executed in the victim's browser (XXS) or transmitted to another server (SSRF) gives the attacker the ability to execute arbitrary code on the server fully compromising confidentiality, integrity and availability. |
| CVE-2024-47222 | New Cloud MyOffice SDK Collaborative Editing Server 2.2.2 through 2.8 allows SSRF via manipulation of requests from external document storage via the MS-WOPI protocol. |
| CVE-2024-47208 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability in Apache OFBiz. This issue affects Apache OFBiz: before 18.12.17. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 18.12.17, which fixes the issue. |
| CVE-2024-47190 | Northern.tech Hosted Mender before 2024.07.11 allows SSRF. |
| CVE-2024-47167 | Gradio is an open-source Python package designed for quick prototyping. This vulnerability relates to **Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)** in the `/queue/join` endpoint. Gradio’s `async_save_url_to_cache` function allows attackers to force the Gradio server to send HTTP requests to user-controlled URLs. This could enable attackers to target internal servers or services within a local network and possibly exfiltrate data or cause unwanted internal requests. Additionally, the content from these URLs is stored locally, making it easier for attackers to upload potentially malicious files to the server. This impacts users deploying Gradio servers that use components like the Video component which involve URL fetching. Users are advised to upgrade to `gradio>=5` to address this issue. As a workaround, users can disable or heavily restrict URL-based inputs in their Gradio applications to trusted domains only. Additionally, implementing stricter URL validation (such as allowinglist-based validation) and ensuring that local or internal network addresses cannot be requested via the `/queue/join` endpoint can help mitigate the risk of SSRF attacks. |
| CVE-2024-47049 | The czim/file-handling package before 1.5.0 and 2.x before 2.3.0 (used with PHP Composer) does not properly validate URLs within makeFromUrl and makeFromAny, leading to SSRF, and to directory traversal for the reading of local files. |
| CVE-2024-46947 | Northern.tech Mender before 3.6.6 and 3.7.x before 3.7.7 allows SSRF. |
| CVE-2024-46468 | A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the jpress <= v5.1.1, which can be exploited by an attacker to obtain sensitive information, resulting in an information disclosure. |
| CVE-2024-45843 | Mattermost versions 9.5.x <= 9.5.8 fail to include the metadata endpoints of Oracle Cloud and Alibaba in the SSRF denylist, which allows an attacker to possibly cause an SSRF if Mattermost was deployed in Oracle Cloud or Alibaba. |
| CVE-2024-4562 | In WhatsUp Gold versions released before 2023.1.2 , an SSRF vulnerability exists in Whatsup Gold's Issue exists in the HTTP Monitoring functionality. Due to the lack of proper authorization, any authenticated user can access the HTTP monitoring functionality, what leads to the Server Side Request Forgery. |
| CVE-2024-4561 | In WhatsUp Gold versions released before 2023.1.2 , a blind SSRF vulnerability exists in Whatsup Gold's FaviconController that allows an attacker to send arbitrary HTTP requests on behalf of the vulnerable server. |
| CVE-2024-45518 | An issue was discovered in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) 10.1.x before 10.1.1, 10.0.x before 10.0.9, 9.0.0 before Patch 41, and 8.8.15 before Patch 46. It allows authenticated users to exploit Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) due to improper input sanitization and misconfigured domain whitelisting. This issue permits unauthorized HTTP requests to be sent to internal services, which can lead to Remote Code Execution (RCE) by chaining Command Injection within the internal service. When combined with existing XSS vulnerabilities, this SSRF issue can further facilitate Remote Code Execution (RCE). |
| CVE-2024-45507 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability in Apache OFBiz. This issue affects Apache OFBiz: before 18.12.16. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 18.12.16, which fixes the issue. |
| CVE-2024-45317 | A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in SMA1000 appliance firmware versions 12.4.3-02676 and earlier allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to cause the SMA1000 server-side application to make requests to an unintended IP address. |
| CVE-2024-45119 | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.7-p2, 2.4.6-p7, 2.4.5-p9, 2.4.4-p10 and earlier are affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could lead to arbitrary file system read. A low-privilege authenticated attacker can force the application to make arbitrary requests via injection of arbitrary URLs and have a low impact on both confidentiality and integrity. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction and scope is changed. |
| CVE-2024-44721 | SeaCMS v13.1 was discovered to a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the url parameter at /admin_reslib.php. |
| CVE-2024-4469 | The WP STAGING WordPress Backup Plugin WordPress plugin before 3.5.0 does not prevent users with the administrator role from pinging conducting SSRF attacks, which may be a problem in multisite configurations. |
| CVE-2024-44677 | eladmin v2.7 and before is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) which allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the DatabaseController.java component. |
| CVE-2024-4399 | The does not validate a parameter before making a request to it, which could allow unauthenticated users to perform SSRF attack |
| CVE-2024-43989 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Firsh Justified Image Grid allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Justified Image Grid: from n/a through 4.6.1. |
| CVE-2024-4325 | A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the gradio-app/gradio version 4.21.0, specifically within the `/queue/join` endpoint and the `save_url_to_cache` function. The vulnerability arises when the `path` value, obtained from the user and expected to be a URL, is used to make an HTTP request without sufficient validation checks. This flaw allows an attacker to send crafted requests that could lead to unauthorized access to the local network or the AWS metadata endpoint, thereby compromising the security of internal servers. |
| CVE-2024-4260 | The Page Builder Gutenberg Blocks WordPress plugin before 3.1.12 does not prevent users from pinging arbitrary hosts via some of its shortcodes, which could allow high privilege users such as contributors to perform SSRF attacks. |
| CVE-2024-42467 | openHAB, a provider of open-source home automation software, has add-ons including the visualization add-on CometVisu. Prior to version 4.2.1, the proxy endpoint of openHAB's CometVisu add-on can be accessed without authentication. This proxy-feature can be exploited as Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) to induce GET HTTP requests to internal-only servers, in case openHAB is exposed in a non-private network. Furthermore, this proxy-feature can also be exploited as a Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability, as an attacker is able to re-route a request to their server and return a page with malicious JavaScript code. Since the browser receives this data directly from the openHAB CometVisu UI, this JavaScript code will be executed with the origin of the CometVisu UI. This allows an attacker to exploit call endpoints on an openHAB server even if the openHAB server is located in a private network. (e.g. by sending an openHAB admin a link that proxies malicious JavaScript.) This issue may lead up to Remote Code Execution (RCE) when chained with other vulnerabilities. Users should upgrade to version 4.2.1 of the CometVisu add-on of openHAB to receive a patch. |
| CVE-2024-42352 | Nuxt is a free and open-source framework to create full-stack web applications and websites with Vue.js. `nuxt/icon` provides an API to allow client side icon lookup. This endpoint is at `/api/_nuxt_icon/[name]`. The proxied request path is improperly parsed, allowing an attacker to change the scheme and host of the request. This leads to SSRF, and could potentially lead to sensitive data exposure. The `new URL` constructor is used to parse the final path. This constructor can be passed a relative scheme or path in order to change the host the request is sent to. This constructor is also very tolerant of poorly formatted URLs. As a result we can pass a path prefixed with the string `http:`. This has the effect of changing the scheme to HTTP. We can then subsequently pass a new host, for example `http:127.0.0.1:8080`. This would allow us to send requests to a local server. This issue has been addressed in release version 1.4.5 and all users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. |
| CVE-2024-41813 | txtdot is an HTTP proxy that parses only text, links, and pictures from pages, removing ads and heavy scripts. Starting in version 1.4.0 and prior to version 1.6.1, a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the `/proxy` route of txtdot allows remote attackers to use the server as a proxy to send HTTP GET requests to arbitrary targets and retrieve information in the internal network. Version 1.6.1 patches the issue. |
| CVE-2024-41812 | txtdot is an HTTP proxy that parses only text, links, and pictures from pages, removing ads and heavy scripts. Prior to version 1.7.0, a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the `/get` route of txtdot allows remote attackers to use the server as a proxy to send HTTP GET requests to arbitrary targets and retrieve information in the internal network. Version 1.7.0 prevents displaying the response of forged requests, but the requests can still be sent. For complete mitigation, a firewall between txtdot and other internal network resources should be set. |
| CVE-2024-41668 | The cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics provides visualization, analysis, and download of large-scale cancer genomics data sets. When running a publicly exposed proxy endpoint without authentication, cBioPortal could allow someone to perform a Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attack. Logged in users could do the same on private instances. A fix has been released in version 6.0.12. As a workaround, one might be able to disable `/proxy` endpoint entirely via, for example, nginx. |
| CVE-2024-41664 | Canarytokens help track activity and actions on a network. Prior to `sha-8ea5315`, Canarytokens.org was vulnerable to a blind SSRF in the Webhook alert feature. When a Canarytoken is created, users choose to receive alerts either via email or via a webhook. If a webhook is supplied when a Canarytoken is first created, the site will make a test request to the supplied URL to ensure it accepts alert notification HTTP requests. No safety checks were performed on the URL, leading to a Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability. The SSRF is Blind because the content of the response is not displayed to the creating user; they are simply told whether an error occurred in making the test request. Using the Blind SSRF, it was possible to map out open ports for IPs inside the Canarytokens.org infrastructure. This issue is now patched on Canarytokens.org. Users of self-hosted Canarytokens installations can update by pulling the latest Docker image, or any Docker image after `sha-097d91a`. |
| CVE-2024-41570 | An Unauthenticated Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in demon callback handling in Havoc 2 0.7 allows attackers to send arbitrary network traffic originating from the team server. |
| CVE-2024-41305 | A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the Plugins Page of WonderCMS v3.4.3 allows attackers to force the application to make arbitrary requests via injection of crafted URLs into the pluginThemeUrl parameter. |
| CVE-2024-40898 | SSRF in Apache HTTP Server on Windows with mod_rewrite in server/vhost context, allows to potentially leak NTML hashes to a malicious server via SSRF and malicious requests. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.4.62 which fixes this issue. |
| CVE-2024-4084 | A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the latest version of mintplex-labs/anything-llm, allowing attackers to bypass the official fix intended to restrict access to intranet IP addresses and protocols. Despite efforts to filter out intranet IP addresses starting with 192, 172, 10, and 127 through regular expressions and limit access protocols to HTTP and HTTPS, attackers can still bypass these restrictions using alternative representations of IP addresses and accessing other ports running on localhost. This vulnerability enables attackers to access any asset on the internal network, attack web services on the internal network, scan hosts on the internal network, and potentially access AWS metadata endpoints. The vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied URLs, which can be exploited to perform SSRF attacks. |
| CVE-2024-40718 | A server side request forgery vulnerability allows a low-privileged user to perform local privilege escalation through exploiting an SSRF vulnerability. |
| CVE-2024-40642 | The netty incubator codec.bhttp is a java language binary http parser. In affected versions the `BinaryHttpParser` class does not properly validate input values thus giving attackers almost complete control over the HTTP requests constructed from the parsed output. Attackers can abuse several issues individually to perform various injection attacks including HTTP request smuggling, desync attacks, HTTP header injections, request queue poisoning, caching attacks and Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF). Attacker could also combine several issues to create well-formed messages for other text-based protocols which may result in attacks beyond the HTTP protocol. The BinaryHttpParser class implements the readRequestHead method which performs most of the relevant parsing of the received request. The data structure prefixes values with a variable length integer value. The parsing code below first gets the lengths of the values from the prefixed variable length integer. After it has all of the lengths and calculates all of the indices, the parser casts the applicable slices of the ByteBuf to String. Finally, it passes these values into a new `DefaultBinaryHttpRequest` object where no further parsing or validation occurs. Method is partially validated while other values are not validated at all. Software that relies on netty to apply input validation for binary HTTP data may be vulnerable to various injection and protocol based attacks. This issue has been addressed in version 0.0.13.Final. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. |
| CVE-2024-40632 | Linkerd is an open source, ultralight, security-first service mesh for Kubernetes. In affected versions when the application being run by linkerd is susceptible to SSRF, an attacker could potentially trigger a denial-of-service (DoS) attack by making requests to localhost:4191/shutdown. Linkerd could introduce an optional environment variable to control a token that must be passed as a header. Linkerd should reject shutdown requests that do not include this header. This issue has been addressed in release version edge-24.6.2 and all users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. |
| CVE-2024-40544 | PublicCMS v4.0.202302.e was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the component /admin/#maintenance_sysTask/edit. |
| CVE-2024-40543 | PublicCMS v4.0.202302.e was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the component /admin/ueditor?action=catchimage. |
| CVE-2024-39739 | IBM Datacap Navigator 9.1.5, 9.1.6, 9.1.7, 9.1.8, and 9.1.9 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 296008. |
| CVE-2024-39713 | A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) affects Rocket.Chat's Twilio webhook endpoint before version 6.10.1. |
| CVE-2024-39699 | Directus is a real-time API and App dashboard for managing SQL database content. There was already a reported SSRF vulnerability via file import. It was fixed by resolving all DNS names and checking if the requested IP is an internal IP address. However it is possible to bypass this security measure and execute a SSRF using redirects. Directus allows redirects when importing file from the URL and does not check the result URL. Thus, it is possible to execute a request to an internal IP, for example to 127.0.0.1. However, it is blind SSRF, because Directus also uses response interception technique to get the information about the connect from the socket directly and it does not show a response if the IP address is internal. This vulnerability is fixed in 10.9.3. |
| CVE-2024-39637 | Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Pixelcurve Edubin edubin.This issue affects Edubin: from n/a through 9.2.0. |
| CVE-2024-39573 | Potential SSRF in mod_rewrite in Apache HTTP Server 2.4.59 and earlier allows an attacker to cause unsafe RewriteRules to unexpectedly setup URL's to be handled by mod_proxy. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.4.60, which fixes this issue. |
| CVE-2024-39338 | axios 1.7.2 allows SSRF via unexpected behavior where requests for path relative URLs get processed as protocol relative URLs. |
| CVE-2024-38791 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Jordy Meow AI Engine: ChatGPT Chatbot allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects AI Engine: ChatGPT Chatbot: from n/a through 2.4.7. |
| CVE-2024-38758 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in WappPress Team WappPress.This issue affects WappPress: from n/a through 6.0.4. |
| CVE-2024-38730 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Noor alam Magical Addons For Elementor.This issue affects Magical Addons For Elementor: from n/a through 1.1.41. |
| CVE-2024-38728 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Seraphinite Solutions Seraphinite Post .DOCX Source.This issue affects Seraphinite Post .DOCX Source: from n/a through 2.16.9. |
| CVE-2024-38723 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Bernhard Kux JSON Content Importer.This issue affects JSON Content Importer: from n/a through 1.5.6. |
| CVE-2024-38645 | A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability has been reported to affect Notes Station 3. If exploited, the vulnerability could allow remote authenticated attackers to read application data. We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following version: Notes Station 3 3.9.7 and later |
| CVE-2024-38514 | NextChat is a cross-platform ChatGPT/Gemini UI. There is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability due to a lack of validation of the `endpoint` GET parameter on the WebDav API endpoint. This SSRF can be used to perform arbitrary HTTPS request from the vulnerable instance (MKCOL, PUT and GET methods supported), or to target NextChat users and make them execute arbitrary JavaScript code in their browser. This vulnerability has been patched in version 2.12.4. |
| CVE-2024-38476 | Vulnerability in core of Apache HTTP Server 2.4.59 and earlier are vulnerably to information disclosure, SSRF or local script execution via backend applications whose response headers are malicious or exploitable. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.4.60, which fixes this issue. |
| CVE-2024-38472 | SSRF in Apache HTTP Server on Windows allows to potentially leak NTLM hashes to a malicious server via SSRF and malicious requests or content Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.4.60 which fixes this issue. Note: Existing configurations that access UNC paths will have to configure new directive "UNCList" to allow access during request processing. |
| CVE-2024-38206 | An authenticated attacker can bypass Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) protection in Microsoft Copilot Studio to leak sensitive information over a network. |
| CVE-2024-38109 | An authenticated attacker can exploit an Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Microsoft Azure Health Bot to elevate privileges over a network. |
| CVE-2024-37942 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Berqier Ltd BerqWP.This issue affects BerqWP: from n/a through 1.7.5. |
| CVE-2024-37818 | ** DISPUTED ** Strapi v4.24.4 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the component /strapi.io/_next/image. This vulnerability allows attackers to scan for open ports or access sensitive information via a crafted GET request. NOTE: The Strapi Development Community argues that this issue is not valid. They contend that "the strapi/admin was wrongly attributed a flaw that only pertains to the strapi.io website, and which, at the end of the day, does not pose any real SSRF risk to applications that make use of the Strapi library." |
| CVE-2024-37260 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Theme-Ruby Foxiz.This issue affects Foxiz: from n/a through 2.3.5. |
| CVE-2024-37208 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Robert Macchi WP Scraper.This issue affects WP Scraper: from n/a through 5.7. |
| CVE-2024-37164 | Computer Vision Annotation Tool (CVAT) is an interactive video and image annotation tool for computer vision. CVAT allows users to supply custom endpoint URLs for cloud storages based on Amazon S3 and Azure Blob Storage. Starting in version 2.1.0 and prior to version 2.14.3, an attacker with a CVAT account can exploit this feature by specifying URLs whose host part is an intranet IP address or an internal domain name. By doing this, the attacker may be able to probe the network that the CVAT backend runs in for HTTP(S) servers. In addition, if there is a web server on this network that is sufficiently API-compatible with an Amazon S3 or Azure Blob Storage endpoint, and either allows anonymous access, or allows authentication with credentials that are known by the attacker, then the attacker may be able to create a cloud storage linked to this server. They may then be able to list files on the server; extract files from the server, if these files are of a type that CVAT supports reading from cloud storage (media data (such as images/videos/archives), importable annotations or datasets, task/project backups); and/or overwrite files on this server with exported annotations/datasets/backups. The exact capabilities of the attacker will depend on how the internal server is configured. Users should upgrade to CVAT 2.14.3 to receive a patch. In this release, the existing SSRF mitigation measures are applied to requests to cloud providers, with access to intranet IP addresses prohibited by default. Some workarounds are also available. One may use network security solutions such as virtual networks or firewalls to prohibit network access from the CVAT backend to unrelated servers on your internal network and/or require authentication for access to internal servers. |
| CVE-2024-37098 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Blossom Themes BlossomThemes Email Newsletter.This issue affects BlossomThemes Email Newsletter: from n/a through 2.2.6. |
| CVE-2024-36675 | LyLme_spage v1.9.5 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the get_head function. |
| CVE-2024-36448 | ** UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED ** Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Apache IoTDB Workbench. This issue affects Apache IoTDB Workbench: from 0.13.0. As this project is retired, we do not plan to release a version that fixes this issue. Users are recommended to find an alternative or restrict access to the instance to trusted users. NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer. |
| CVE-2024-35637 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Church Admin.This issue affects Church Admin: from n/a through 4.3.6. |
| CVE-2024-35635 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in WPManageNinja LLC Ninja Tables.This issue affects Ninja Tables: from n/a through 5.0.9. |
| CVE-2024-35633 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in CreativeThemes Blocksy Companion.This issue affects Blocksy Companion: from n/a through 2.0.42. |
| CVE-2024-35172 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in ShortPixel ShortPixel Adaptive Images.This issue affects ShortPixel Adaptive Images: from n/a through 3.8.3. |
| CVE-2024-34581 | The W3C XML Signature Syntax and Processing (XMLDsig) specification, starting with 1.0, was originally published with a "RetrievalMethod is a URI ... that may be used to obtain key and/or certificate information" statement and no accompanying information about SSRF risks, and this may have contributed to vulnerable implementations such as those discussed in CVE-2023-36661 and CVE-2024-21893. NOTE: this was mitigated in 1.1 and 2.0 via a directly referenced Best Practices document that calls on implementers to be wary of SSRF. |
| CVE-2024-34580 | ** DISPUTED ** Apache XML Security for C++ through 2.0.4 implements the XML Signature Syntax and Processing (XMLDsig) specification without protection against an SSRF payload in a KeyInfo element. NOTE: the project disputes this CVE Record on the grounds that any vulnerabilities are the result of a failure to configure XML Security for C++ securely. Even when avoiding this particular issue, any use of this library would need considerable additional code and a deep understanding of the standards and protocols involved to arrive at a secure implementation for any particular use case. We recommend against continued direct use of this library. |
| CVE-2024-34453 | TwoNav 2.1.13 contains an SSRF vulnerability via the url paramater to index.php?c=api&method=read_data&type=connectivity_test (which reaches /system/api.php). |
| CVE-2024-34365 | ** UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED ** Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Apache Karaf Cave.This issue affects all versions of Apache Karaf Cave. As this project is retired, we do not plan to release a version that fixes this issue. Users are recommended to find an alternative or restrict access to the instance to trusted users.NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer. |
| CVE-2024-34351 | Next.js is a React framework that can provide building blocks to create web applications. A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was identified in Next.js Server Actions. If the `Host` header is modified, and the below conditions are also met, an attacker may be able to make requests that appear to be originating from the Next.js application server itself. The required conditions are 1) Next.js is running in a self-hosted manner; 2) the Next.js application makes use of Server Actions; and 3) the Server Action performs a redirect to a relative path which starts with a `/`. This vulnerability was fixed in Next.js `14.1.1`. |
| CVE-2024-34111 | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.7, 2.4.6-p5, 2.4.5-p7, 2.4.4-p8 and earlier are affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could lead to arbitrary file system read. A low-privilege authenticated attacker can force the application to make arbitrary requests via injection of arbitrary URLs. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.. |
| CVE-2024-33864 | An issue was discovered in linqi before 1.4.0.1 on Windows. There is SSRF via Document template generation; i.e., via remote images in process creation, file inclusion, and PDF document generation via malicious JavaScript. |
| CVE-2024-33832 | OneNav v0.9.35-20240318 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the component /index.php?c=api&method=get_link_info. |
| CVE-2024-33634 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Piotnet Piotnet Addons For Elementor Pro.This issue affects Piotnet Addons For Elementor Pro: from n/a through 7.1.17. |
| CVE-2024-33629 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Creative Motion Auto Featured Image (Auto Post Thumbnail).This issue affects Auto Featured Image (Auto Post Thumbnail): from n/a through 4.0.0. |
| CVE-2024-33627 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Cusmin Absolutely Glamorous Custom Admin.This issue affects Absolutely Glamorous Custom Admin: from n/a through 7.2.2. |
| CVE-2024-33592 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in SoftLab Radio Player.This issue affects Radio Player: from n/a through 2.0.73. |
| CVE-2024-33590 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in codeSavory Knowledge Base documentation & wiki plugin – BasePress.This issue affects Knowledge Base documentation & wiki plugin – BasePress: from n/a through 2.16.1. |
| CVE-2024-33449 | An SSRF issue in the PDFMyURL service allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information and execute arbitrary code via a POST request in the url parameter |
| CVE-2024-33117 | crmeb_java v1.3.4 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the mergeList method in class com.zbkj.front.pub.ImageMergeController. |
| CVE-2024-32955 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Foliovision FV Flowplayer Video Player.This issue affects FV Flowplayer Video Player: from n/a through 7.5.43.7212. |
| CVE-2024-32819 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Culqi.This issue affects Culqi: from n/a through 3.0.14. |
| CVE-2024-32812 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Podlove Podlove Podcast Publisher.This issue affects Podlove Podcast Publisher: from n/a through 4.0.11. |
| CVE-2024-32803 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in 2day.Sk, Webikon SuperFaktura WooCommerce.This issue affects SuperFaktura WooCommerce: from n/a through 1.40.3. |
| CVE-2024-32775 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Pavex Embed Google Photos album.This issue affects Embed Google Photos album: from n/a through 2.1.9. |
| CVE-2024-32718 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Webangon The Pack Elementor.This issue affects The Pack Elementor addons: from n/a through 2.0.8.2. |
| CVE-2024-32454 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Wappointment Appointment Bookings for Zoom GoogleMeet and more – Wappointment.This issue affects Appointment Bookings for Zoom GoogleMeet and more – Wappointment: from n/a through 2.6.0. |
| CVE-2024-32430 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in ActiveCampaign.This issue affects ActiveCampaign: from n/a through 8.1.14. |
| CVE-2024-31979 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Apache StreamPipes during installation process of pipeline elements. Previously, StreamPipes allowed users to configure custom endpoints from which to install additional pipeline elements. These endpoints were not properly validated, allowing an attacker to get StreamPipes to send an HTTP GET request to an arbitrary address. This issue affects Apache StreamPipes: through 0.93.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.95.0, which fixes the issue. |
| CVE-2024-31897 | IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation 18.0.0, 18.0.1, 18.0.2, 19.0.1, 19.0.2, 19.0.3, 20.0.1, 20.0.2, 20.0.3, 21.0.1, 21.0.2, 21.0.3, 22.0.1, 22.0.2, 23.0.1, and 23.0.2 vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 288178. |
| CVE-2024-3152 | mintplex-labs/anything-llm is vulnerable to multiple security issues due to improper input validation in several endpoints. An attacker can exploit these vulnerabilities to escalate privileges from a default user role to an admin role, read and delete arbitrary files on the system, and perform Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attacks. The vulnerabilities are present in the `/request-token`, `/workspace/:slug/thread/:threadSlug/update`, `/system/remove-logo`, `/system/logo`, and collector's `/process` endpoints. These issues are due to the application's failure to properly validate user input before passing it to `prisma` functions and other critical operations. Affected versions include the latest version prior to 1.0.0. |
| CVE-2024-3149 | A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the upload link feature of mintplex-labs/anything-llm. This feature, intended for users with manager or admin roles, processes uploaded links through an internal Collector API using a headless browser. An attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious website and using it to perform actions such as internal port scanning, accessing internal web applications not exposed externally, and interacting with the Collector API. This interaction can lead to unauthorized actions such as arbitrary file deletion and limited Local File Inclusion (LFI), including accessing NGINX access logs which may contain sensitive information. |
| CVE-2024-31461 | Plane, an open-source project management tool, has a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in versions prior to 0.17-dev. This issue may allow an attacker to send arbitrary requests from the server hosting the application, potentially leading to unauthorized access to internal systems. The impact of this vulnerability includes, but is not limited to, unauthorized access to internal services accessible from the server, potential leakage of sensitive information from internal services, manipulation of internal systems by interacting with internal APIs. Version 0.17-dev contains a patch for this issue. Those who are unable to update immediately may mitigate the issue by restricting outgoing network connections from servers hosting the application to essential services only and/or implementing strict input validation on URLs or parameters that are used to generate server-side requests. |
| CVE-2024-31288 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in RapidLoad RapidLoad Power-Up for Autoptimize.This issue affects RapidLoad Power-Up for Autoptimize: from n/a through 2.2.11. |
| CVE-2024-31229 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Really Simple Plugins Really Simple SSL.This issue affects Really Simple SSL: from n/a through 7.2.3. |
| CVE-2024-31215 | Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) is a security research platform for mobile applications in Android, iOS and Windows Mobile. A SSRF vulnerability in firebase database check logic. The attacker can cause the server to make a connection to internal-only services within the organization’s infrastructure. When a malicious app is uploaded to Static analyzer, it is possible to make internal requests. This vulnerability has been patched in version 3.9.8. |
| CVE-2024-3095 | A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the Web Research Retriever component of langchain-ai/langchain version 0.1.5. The vulnerability arises because the Web Research Retriever does not restrict requests to remote internet addresses, allowing it to reach local addresses. This flaw enables attackers to execute port scans, access local services, and in some scenarios, read instance metadata from cloud environments. The vulnerability is particularly concerning as it can be exploited to abuse the Web Explorer server as a proxy for web attacks on third parties and interact with servers in the local network, including reading their response data. This could potentially lead to arbitrary code execution, depending on the nature of the local services. The vulnerability is limited to GET requests, as POST requests are not possible, but the impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability is significant due to the potential for stolen credentials and state-changing interactions with internal APIs. |
| CVE-2024-30532 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Builderall Team Builderall Builder for WordPress.This issue affects Builderall Builder for WordPress: from n/a through 2.0.1. |
| CVE-2024-30531 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Nelio Software Nelio Content.This issue affects Nelio Content: from n/a through 3.2.0. |
| CVE-2024-30453 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Brave Brave Popup Builder.This issue affects Brave Popup Builder: from n/a through 0.6.5. |
| CVE-2024-30420 | Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in a-blog cms Ver.3.1.x series versions prior to Ver.3.1.12 and Ver.3.0.x series versions prior to Ver.3.0.32. If this vulnerability is exploited, a user with an administrator or higher privilege who can log in to the product may obtain arbitrary files on the server and information on the internal server that is not disclosed to the public. |
| CVE-2024-29736 | A SSRF vulnerability in WADL service description in versions of Apache CXF before 4.0.5, 3.6.4 and 3.5.9 allows an attacker to perform SSRF style attacks on REST webservices. The attack only applies if a custom stylesheet parameter is configured. |
| CVE-2024-29415 | The ip package through 2.0.1 for Node.js might allow SSRF because some IP addresses (such as 127.1, 01200034567, 012.1.2.3, 000:0:0000::01, and ::fFFf:127.0.0.1) are improperly categorized as globally routable via isPublic. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2023-42282. |
| CVE-2024-29319 | Volmarg Personal Management System 1.4.64 is vulnerable to SSRF (Server Side Request Forgery) via uploading a SVG file. The server can make unintended HTTP and DNS requests to a server that the attacker controls. |
| CVE-2024-29173 | Dell PowerProtect DD, versions prior to 8.0, LTS 7.13.1.0, LTS 7.10.1.30, LTS 7.7.5.40 contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. A remote high privileged attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to disclosure of information on the application or remote client. |
| CVE-2024-29090 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Jordy Meow AI Engine: ChatGPT Chatbot.This issue affects AI Engine: ChatGPT Chatbot: from n/a through 2.1.4. |
| CVE-2024-29030 | memos is a privacy-first, lightweight note-taking service. In memos 0.13.2, an SSRF vulnerability exists at the /api/resource that allows authenticated users to enumerate the internal network. Version 0.22.0 of memos removes the vulnerable file. |
| CVE-2024-29029 | memos is a privacy-first, lightweight note-taking service. In memos 0.13.2, an SSRF vulnerability exists at the /o/get/image that allows unauthenticated users to enumerate the internal network and retrieve images. The response from the image request is then copied into the response of the current server request, causing a reflected XSS vulnerability. Version 0.22.0 of memos removes the vulnerable file. |
| CVE-2024-29028 | memos is a privacy-first, lightweight note-taking service. In memos 0.13.2, an SSRF vulnerability exists at the /o/get/httpmeta that allows unauthenticated users to enumerate the internal network and receive limited html values in json form. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.16.1. |
| CVE-2024-29021 | Judge0 is an open-source online code execution system. The default configuration of Judge0 leaves the service vulnerable to a sandbox escape via Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF). This allows an attacker with sufficient access to the Judge0 API to obtain unsandboxed code execution as root on the target machine. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.13.1. |
| CVE-2024-28752 | A SSRF vulnerability using the Aegis DataBinding in versions of Apache CXF before 4.0.4, 3.6.3 and 3.5.8 allows an attacker to perform SSRF style attacks on webservices that take at least one parameter of any type. Users of other data bindings (including the default databinding) are not impacted. |
| CVE-2024-28435 | The CRM platform Twenty version 0.3.0 is vulnerable to SSRF via file upload. |
| CVE-2024-28198 | OpenOlat is an open source web-based e-learning platform for teaching, learning, assessment and communication. By manually manipulating http requests when using the draw.io integration it is possible to read arbitrary files as the configured system user and SSRF. The problem is fixed in version 18.1.6 and 18.2.2. It is advised to upgrade to the latest version of 18.1.x or 18.2.x. Users unable to upgrade may work around this issue by disabling the Draw.io module or the entire REST API which will secure the system. |
| CVE-2024-2796 | A server-side request forgery (SSRF) was discovered in the Akana API Platform in versions prior to and including 2022.1.3. Reported by Jakob Antonsson. |
| CVE-2024-27949 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in sirv.Com Image Optimizer, Resizer and CDN – Sirv.This issue affects Image Optimizer, Resizer and CDN – Sirv: from n/a through 7.2.0. |
| CVE-2024-27927 | RSSHub is an open source RSS feed generator. Prior to version 1.0.0-master.a429472, RSSHub allows remote attackers to use the server as a proxy to send HTTP GET requests to arbitrary targets and retrieve information in the internal network or conduct Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacks. The attacker can send malicious requests to a RSSHub server, to make the server send HTTP GET requests to arbitrary destinations and see partial responses. This may lead to leak the server IP address, which could be hidden behind a CDN; retrieving information in the internal network, e.g. which addresses/ports are accessible, the titles and meta descriptions of HTML pages; and denial of service amplification. The attacker could request the server to download some large files, or chain several SSRF requests in a single attacker request. |
| CVE-2024-27775 | SysAid before version 23.2.14 b18 - CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) may allow exposing the local OS user's NTLMv2 hash |
| CVE-2024-27707 | Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in hcengineering Huly Platform v.0.6.202 allows attackers to run arbitrary code via upload of crafted SVG file. |
| CVE-2024-27565 | A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in weixin.php of ChatGPT-wechat-personal commit a0857f6 allows attackers to force the application to make arbitrary requests. |
| CVE-2024-27564 | A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in pictureproxy.php of ChatGPT commit f9f4bbc allows attackers to force the application to make arbitrary requests via injection of crafted URLs into the urlparameter. |
| CVE-2024-27563 | A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the getFileFromRepo function of WonderCMS v3.1.3 allows attackers to force the application to make arbitrary requests via injection of crafted URLs into the pluginThemeUrl parameter. |
| CVE-2024-27561 | A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the installUpdateThemePluginAction function of WonderCMS v3.1.3 allows attackers to force the application to make arbitrary requests via injection of crafted URLs into the installThemePlugin parameter. |
| CVE-2024-27477 | In Leantime 3.0.6, a Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability exists within the ticket creation and modification functionality, allowing attackers to inject malicious JavaScript code into the title field of tickets (also known as to-dos). This stored XSS vulnerability can be exploited to perform Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attacks. |
| CVE-2024-27347 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Apache HugeGraph-Hubble.This issue affects Apache HugeGraph-Hubble: from 1.0.0 before 1.3.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.3.0, which fixes the issue. |
| CVE-2024-27098 | GLPI is a Free Asset and IT Management Software package, Data center management, ITIL Service Desk, licenses tracking and software auditing. An authenticated user can execute a SSRF based attack using Arbitrary Object Instantiation. This issue has been patched in version 10.0.13. |
| CVE-2024-26469 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Tunis Soft "Product Designer" (productdesigner) module for PrestaShop before version 1.178.36, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (DoS) and escalate privileges via the url parameter in the postProcess() method. |
| CVE-2024-25915 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Raaj Trambadia Pexels: Free Stock Photos.This issue affects Pexels: Free Stock Photos: from n/a through 1.2.2. |
| CVE-2024-25864 | Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Friendica versions after v.2023.12, allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code and obtain sensitive information via the fpostit.php component. |
| CVE-2024-25738 | A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the /Upgrade/FixConfig route in Open Library Foundation VuFind 2.0 through 9.1 before 9.1.1 allows a remote attacker to overwrite local configuration files to gain access to the administrator panel and achieve Remote Code Execution. A mitigating factor is that it requires the allow_url_include PHP runtime setting to be on, which is off in default installations. It also requires the /Upgrade route to be exposed, which is exposed by default after installing VuFind, and is recommended to be disabled by setting autoConfigure to false in config.ini. |
| CVE-2024-25737 | A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the /Cover/Show route (showAction in CoverController.php) in Open Library Foundation VuFind 2.4 through 9.1 before 9.1.1 allows remote attackers to access internal HTTP servers and perform Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) attacks by proxying arbitrary URLs via the proxy GET parameter. |
| CVE-2024-25294 | An SSRF issue in REBUILD v.3.5 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information and execute arbitrary code via the FileDownloader.java, proxyDownload,URL parameters. |
| CVE-2024-25187 | Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in 71cms v1.0.0, allows remote unauthenticated attackers to obtain sensitive information via getweather.html. |
| CVE-2024-24888 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Kadence WP Gutenberg Blocks by Kadence Blocks.This issue affects Gutenberg Blocks by Kadence Blocks: from n/a through 3.2.25. |
| CVE-2024-24829 | Sentry is an error tracking and performance monitoring platform. Sentry’s integration platform provides a way for external services to interact with Sentry. One of such integrations, the Phabricator integration (maintained by Sentry) with version <=24.1.1 contains a constrained SSRF vulnerability. An attacker could make Sentry send POST HTTP requests to arbitrary URLs (including internal IP addresses) by providing an unsanitized input to the Phabricator integration. However, the body payload is constrained to a specific format. If an attacker has access to a Sentry instance, this allows them to: 1. interact with internal network; 2. scan local/remote ports. This issue has been fixed in Sentry self-hosted release 24.1.2, and has already been mitigated on sentry.io on February 8. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. |
| CVE-2024-24806 | libuv is a multi-platform support library with a focus on asynchronous I/O. The `uv_getaddrinfo` function in `src/unix/getaddrinfo.c` (and its windows counterpart `src/win/getaddrinfo.c`), truncates hostnames to 256 characters before calling `getaddrinfo`. This behavior can be exploited to create addresses like `0x00007f000001`, which are considered valid by `getaddrinfo` and could allow an attacker to craft payloads that resolve to unintended IP addresses, bypassing developer checks. The vulnerability arises due to how the `hostname_ascii` variable (with a length of 256 bytes) is handled in `uv_getaddrinfo` and subsequently in `uv__idna_toascii`. When the hostname exceeds 256 characters, it gets truncated without a terminating null byte. As a result attackers may be able to access internal APIs or for websites (similar to MySpace) that allows users to have `username.example.com` pages. Internal services that crawl or cache these user pages can be exposed to SSRF attacks if a malicious user chooses a long vulnerable username. This issue has been addressed in release version 1.48.0. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. |
| CVE-2024-24113 | xxl-job =< 2.4.1 has a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability, which causes low-privileged users to control executor to RCE. |
| CVE-2024-24028 | Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Likeshop before 2.5.7 allows attackers to view sensitive information via the avatar parameter in function UserLogic::updateWechatInfo. |
| CVE-2024-23654 | discourse-ai is the AI plugin for the open-source discussion platform Discourse. Prior to commit 94ba0dadc2cf38e8f81c3936974c167219878edd, interactions with different AI services are vulnerable to admin-initiated SSRF attacks. Versions of the plugin that include commit 94ba0dadc2cf38e8f81c3936974c167219878edd contain a patch. As a workaround, one may disable the discourse-ai plugin. |
| CVE-2024-23644 | Trillium is a composable toolkit for building internet applications with async rust. In `trillium-http` prior to 0.3.12 and `trillium-client` prior to 0.5.4, insufficient validation of outbound header values may lead to request splitting or response splitting attacks in scenarios where attackers have sufficient control over headers. This only affects use cases where attackers have control of request headers, and can insert "\r\n" sequences. Specifically, if untrusted and unvalidated input is inserted into header names or values. Outbound `trillium_http::HeaderValue` and `trillium_http::HeaderName` can be constructed infallibly and were not checked for illegal bytes when sending requests from the client or responses from the server. Thus, if an attacker has sufficient control over header values (or names) in a request or response that they could inject `\r\n` sequences, they could get the client and server out of sync, and then pivot to gain control over other parts of requests or responses. (i.e. exfiltrating data from other requests, SSRF, etc.) In `trillium-http` versions 0.3.12 and later, if a header name is invalid in server response headers, the specific header and any associated values are omitted from network transmission. Additionally, if a header value is invalid in server response headers, the individual header value is omitted from network transmission. Other headers values with the same header name will still be sent. In `trillium-client` versions 0.5.4 and later, if any header name or header value is invalid in the client request headers, awaiting the client Conn returns an `Error::MalformedHeader` prior to any network access. As a workaround, Trillium services and client applications should sanitize or validate untrusted input that is included in header values and header names. Carriage return, newline, and null characters are not allowed. |
| CVE-2024-23500 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Kadence WP Gutenberg Blocks by Kadence Blocks.This issue affects Gutenberg Blocks by Kadence Blocks: from n/a through 3.2.19. |
| CVE-2024-23336 | MyBB is a free and open source forum software. The default list of disallowed remote hosts does not contain the `127.0.0.0/8` block, which may result in a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. The Configuration File's _Disallowed Remote Addresses_ list (`$config['disallowed_remote_addresses']`) contains the address `127.0.0.1`, but does not include the complete block `127.0.0.0/8`. MyBB 1.8.38 resolves this issue in default installations. Administrators of installed boards should update the existing configuration (`inc/config.php`) to include all addresses blocked by default. Additionally, users are advised to verify that it includes any other IPv4 addresses resolving to the server and other internal resources. Users unable to upgrade may manually add 127.0.0.0/8' to their disallowed address list. |
| CVE-2024-22873 | Tencent Blueking CMDB v3.2.x to v3.9.x was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the event subscription function (/service/subscription.go). This vulnerability allows attackers to access internal requests via a crafted POST request. |
| CVE-2024-22648 | A Blind SSRF vulnerability exists in the "Crawl Meta Data" functionality of SEO Panel version 4.10.0. This makes it possible for remote attackers to scan ports in the local environment. |
| CVE-2024-22329 | IBM WebSphere Application Server 8.5, 9.0 and IBM WebSphere Application Server Liberty 17.0.0.3 through 24.0.0.3 are vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). By sending a specially crafted request, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to conduct the SSRF attack. X-Force ID: 279951. |
| CVE-2024-22262 | Applications that use UriComponentsBuilder to parse an externally provided URL (e.g. through a query parameter) AND perform validation checks on the host of the parsed URL may be vulnerable to a open redirect https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/601.html attack or to a SSRF attack if the URL is used after passing validation checks. This is the same as CVE-2024-22259 https://spring.io/security/cve-2024-22259 and CVE-2024-22243 https://spring.io/security/cve-2024-22243 , but with different input. |
| CVE-2024-22259 | Applications that use UriComponentsBuilder in Spring Framework to parse an externally provided URL (e.g. through a query parameter) AND perform validation checks on the host of the parsed URL may be vulnerable to a open redirect https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/601.html attack or to a SSRF attack if the URL is used after passing validation checks. This is the same as CVE-2024-22243 https://spring.io/security/cve-2024-22243 , but with different input. |
| CVE-2024-22243 | Applications that use UriComponentsBuilder to parse an externally provided URL (e.g. through a query parameter) AND perform validation checks on the host of the parsed URL may be vulnerable to a open redirect https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/601.html attack or to a SSRF attack if the URL is used after passing validation checks. |
| CVE-2024-22219 | XML External Entity (XXE) vulnerability in Terminalfour 8.0.0001 through 8.3.18 and XML JDBC versions up to 1.0.4 allows authenticated users to submit malicious XML via unspecified features which could lead to various actions such as accessing the underlying server, remote code execution (RCE), or performing Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attacks. |
| CVE-2024-22218 | XML External Entity (XXE) vulnerability in Terminalfour 8.0.0001 through 8.3.18 and XML JDBC versions up to 1.0.4 allows authenticated users to submit malicious XML via unspecified features which could lead to various actions such as accessing the underlying server, remote code execution (RCE), or performing Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attacks. |
| CVE-2024-22217 | A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Terminalfour before 8.3.19 allows authenticated users to use specific features to access internal services including sensitive information on the server that Terminalfour runs on. |
| CVE-2024-22134 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Renzo Johnson Contact Form 7 Extension For Mailchimp.This issue affects Contact Form 7 Extension For Mailchimp: from n/a through 0.5.70. |
| CVE-2024-2206 | An SSRF vulnerability exists in the gradio-app/gradio due to insufficient validation of user-supplied URLs in the `/proxy` route. Attackers can exploit this vulnerability by manipulating the `self.replica_urls` set through the `X-Direct-Url` header in requests to the `/` and `/config` routes, allowing the addition of arbitrary URLs for proxying. This flaw enables unauthorized proxying of requests and potential access to internal endpoints within the Hugging Face space. The issue arises from the application's inadequate checking of safe URLs in the `build_proxy_request` function. |
| CVE-2024-21642 | D-Tale is a visualizer for Pandas data structures. Users hosting versions D-Tale prior to 3.9.0 publicly can be vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF), allowing attackers to access files on the server. Users should upgrade to version 3.9.0, where the `Load From the Web` input is turned off by default. The only workaround for versions earlier than 3.9.0 is to only host D-Tale to trusted users. |
| CVE-2024-21527 | Versions of the package github.com/gotenberg/gotenberg/v8/pkg/gotenberg before 8.1.0; versions of the package github.com/gotenberg/gotenberg/v8/pkg/modules/chromium before 8.1.0; versions of the package github.com/gotenberg/gotenberg/v8/pkg/modules/webhook before 8.1.0 are vulnerable to Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the /convert/html endpoint when a request is made to a file via localhost, such as <iframe src="\\localhost/etc/passwd">. By exploiting this vulnerability, an attacker can achieve local file inclusion, allowing of sensitive files read on the host system. Workaround An alternative is using either or both --chromium-deny-list and --chromium-allow-list flags. |
| CVE-2024-21510 | Versions of the package sinatra from 0.0.0 are vulnerable to Reliance on Untrusted Inputs in a Security Decision via the X-Forwarded-Host (XFH) header. When making a request to a method with redirect applied, it is possible to trigger an Open Redirect Attack by inserting an arbitrary address into this header. If used for caching purposes, such as with servers like Nginx, or as a reverse proxy, without handling the X-Forwarded-Host header, attackers can potentially exploit Cache Poisoning or Routing-based SSRF. |
| CVE-2024-21498 | All versions of the package github.com/greenpau/caddy-security are vulnerable to Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF) via X-Forwarded-Host header manipulation. An attacker can expose sensitive information, interact with internal services, or exploit other vulnerabilities within the network by exploiting this vulnerability. |
| CVE-2024-20531 | A vulnerability in the API of Cisco ISE could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to read arbitrary files on the underlying operating system of an affected device and conduct a server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack through an affected device. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker would need valid Super Admin credentials. This vulnerability is due to improper handling of XML External Entity (XXE) entries when parsing XML input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted API request to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to read arbitrary files on the underlying operating system or conduct an SSRF attack through the affected device. |
| CVE-2024-2049 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Citrix SD-WAN Standard/Premium Editions on or after 11.4.0 and before 11.4.4.46 allows an attacker to disclose limited information from the appliance via Access to management IP. |
| CVE-2024-20404 | A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Finesse could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct an SSRF attack on an affected system. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input for specific HTTP requests that are sent to an affected system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to the affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to obtain limited sensitive information for services that are associated to the affected device. |
| CVE-2024-20332 | A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to conduct a server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack through an affected device. This vulnerability is due to improper input validation for specific HTTP requests. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to send arbitrary network requests that are sourced from the affected device. To successfully exploit this vulnerability, the attacker would need valid Super Admin credentials. |
| CVE-2024-20274 | A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) Software, formerly Firepower Management Center Software, could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to inject arbitrary HTML content into a device-generated document. This vulnerability is due to improper validation of user-supplied data. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by submitting malicious content to an affected device and using the device to generate a document that contains sensitive information. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to alter the standard layout of the device-generated documents, access arbitrary files from the underlying operating system, and conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks. To successfully exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would need valid credentials for a user account with policy-editing permissions, such as Network Admin, Intrusion Admin, or any custom user role with the same capabilities. |
| CVE-2024-1884 | This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the PaperCut NG/MF server-side module that allows an attacker to induce the server-side application to make HTTP requests to an arbitrary domain of the attacker's choosing. |
| CVE-2024-1233 | A flaw was found in` JwtValidator.resolvePublicKey` in JBoss EAP, where the validator checks jku and sends a HTTP request. During this process, no whitelisting or other filtering behavior is performed on the destination URL address, which may result in a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. |
| CVE-2024-1183 | An SSRF (Server-Side Request Forgery) vulnerability exists in the gradio-app/gradio repository, allowing attackers to scan and identify open ports within an internal network. By manipulating the 'file' parameter in a GET request, an attacker can discern the status of internal ports based on the presence of a 'Location' header or a 'File not allowed' error in the response. |
| CVE-2024-11618 | A vulnerability classified as critical was found in IPC Unigy Management System 04.03.00.08.0027. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component HTTP Request Handler. The manipulation leads to server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| CVE-2024-11168 | The urllib.parse.urlsplit() and urlparse() functions improperly validated bracketed hosts (`[]`), allowing hosts that weren't IPv6 or IPvFuture. This behavior was not conformant to RFC 3986 and potentially enabled SSRF if a URL is processed by more than one URL parser. |
| CVE-2024-1063 | Appwrite <= v1.4.13 is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the '/v1/avatars/favicon' endpoint due to an incomplete fix of CVE-2023-27159. |
| CVE-2024-0677 | The Pz-LinkCard WordPress plugin through 2.5.1 does not prevent users from pinging arbitrary hosts via some of its shortcodes, which could allow high privilege users such as contributors to perform SSRF attacks. |
| CVE-2024-0403 | Recipes version 1.5.10 allows arbitrary HTTP requests to be made through the server. This is possible because the application is vulnerable to SSRF. |
| CVE-2023-7253 | The Import WP WordPress plugin before 2.13.1 does not prevent users with the administrator role from pinging conducting SSRF attacks, which may be a problem in multisite configurations. |
| CVE-2023-7080 | The V8 inspector intentionally allows arbitrary code execution within the Workers sandbox for debugging. wrangler dev would previously start an inspector server listening on all network interfaces. This would allow an attacker on the local network to connect to the inspector and run arbitrary code. Additionally, the inspector server did not validate Origin/Host headers, granting an attacker that can trick any user on the local network into opening a malicious website the ability to run code. If wrangler dev --remote was being used, an attacker could access production resources if they were bound to the worker. This issue was fixed in wrangler@3.19.0 and wrangler@2.20.2. Whilst wrangler dev's inspector server listens on local interfaces by default as of wrangler@3.16.0, an SSRF vulnerability in miniflare https://github.com/cloudflare/workers-sdk/security/advisories/GHSA-fwvg-2739-22v7 (CVE-2023-7078) allowed access from the local network until wrangler@3.18.0. wrangler@3.19.0 and wrangler@2.20.2 introduced validation for the Origin/Host headers. |
| CVE-2023-6991 | The JSM file_get_contents() Shortcode WordPress plugin before 2.7.1 does not validate one of its shortcode's parameters before making a request to it, which could allow users with contributor role and above to perform SSRF attacks. |
| CVE-2023-6570 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in kubeflow/kubeflow |
| CVE-2023-6388 | Suite CRM version 7.14.2 allows making arbitrary HTTP requests through the vulnerable server. This is possible because the application is vulnerable to SSRF. |
| CVE-2023-6294 | The Popup Builder WordPress plugin before 4.2.6 does not validate a parameter before making a request to it, which could allow users with the administrator role to perform SSRF attack in Multisite WordPress configurations. |
| CVE-2023-6199 | Book Stack version 23.10.2 allows filtering local files on the server. This is possible because the application is vulnerable to SSRF. |
| CVE-2023-6124 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitHub repository salesagility/suitecrm prior to 7.14.2, 8.4.2, 7.12.14. |
| CVE-2023-5974 | The WPB Show Core WordPress plugin through 2.2 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF) via the `path` parameter. |
| CVE-2023-5877 | The affiliate-toolkit WordPress plugin before 3.4.3 lacks authorization and authentication for requests to it's affiliate-toolkit-starter/tools/atkp_imagereceiver.php endpoint, allowing unauthenticated visitors to make requests to arbitrary URL's, including RFC1918 private addresses, leading to a Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) issue. |
| CVE-2023-5798 | The Assistant WordPress plugin before 1.4.4 does not validate a parameter before making a request to it via wp_remote_get(), which could allow users with a role as low as Editor to perform SSRF attacks |
| CVE-2023-5572 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitHub repository vriteio/vrite prior to 0.3.0. |
| CVE-2023-52331 | A post-authenticated server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Trend Micro Apex Central could allow an attacker to interact with internal or local services directly. Please note: an attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. |
| CVE-2023-51697 | Audiobookshelf is a self-hosted audiobook and podcast server. Prior to 2.7.0, Audiobookshelf is vulnerable to unauthenticated blind server-side request (SSRF) vulnerability in `podcastUtils.js`. This vulnerability has been addressed in version 2.7.0. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. |
| CVE-2023-51676 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Leevio Happy Addons for Elementor.This issue affects Happy Addons for Elementor: from n/a through 3.9.1.1. |
| CVE-2023-51665 | Audiobookshelf is a self-hosted audiobook and podcast server. Prior to 2.7.0, Audiobookshelf is vulnerable to unauthenticated blind server-side request (SSRF) vulnerability in Auth.js. This vulnerability has been addressed in version 2.7.0. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. |
| CVE-2023-51441 | ** UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED ** Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Apache Axis allowed users with access to the admin service to perform possible SSRF This issue affects Apache Axis: through 1.3. As Axis 1 has been EOL we recommend you migrate to a different SOAP engine, such as Apache Axis 2/Java. Alternatively you could use a build of Axis with the patch from https://github.com/apache/axis-axis1-java/commit/685c309febc64aa393b2d64a05f90e7eb9f73e06 applied. The Apache Axis project does not expect to create an Axis 1.x release fixing this problem, though contributors that would like to work towards this are welcome. |
| CVE-2023-5122 | Grafana is an open-source platform for monitoring and observability. The CSV datasource plugin is a Grafana Labs maintained plugin for Grafana that allows for retrieving and processing CSV data from a remote endpoint configured by an administrator. If this plugin was configured to send requests to a bare host with no path (e.g. https://www.example.com/ https://www.example.com/` ), requests to an endpoint other than the one configured by the administrator could be triggered by a specially crafted request from any user, resulting in an SSRF vector. AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln-metrics/cvss/v3-calculator |
| CVE-2023-50968 | Arbitrary file properties reading vulnerability in Apache Software Foundation Apache OFBiz when user operates an uri call without authorizations. The same uri can be operated to realize a SSRF attack also without authorizations. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 18.12.11, which fixes this issue. |
| CVE-2023-50952 | IBM InfoSphere Information Server 11.7 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 275774. |
| CVE-2023-50374 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in NiteoThemes CMP – Coming Soon & Maintenance.This issue affects CMP – Coming Soon & Maintenance: from n/a through 4.1.10. |
| CVE-2023-50266 | Bazarr manages and downloads subtitles. In version 1.2.4, the proxy method in bazarr/bazarr/app/ui.py does not validate the user-controlled protocol and url variables and passes them to requests.get() without any sanitization, which leads to a blind server-side request forgery (SSRF). This issue allows for crafting GET requests to internal and external resources on behalf of the server. 1.3.1 contains a partial fix, which limits the vulnerability to HTTP/HTTPS protocols. |
| CVE-2023-50259 | Medusa is an automatic video library manager for TV shows. Versions prior to 1.0.19 are vulnerable to unauthenticated blind server-side request forgery (SSRF). The `testslack` request handler in `medusa/server/web/home/handler.py` does not validate the user-controlled `slack_webhook` variable and passes it to the `notifiers.slack_notifier.test_notify` method, then `_notify_slack` and finally `_send_slack` method, which sends a POST request to the user-controlled URL on line 103 in `/medusa/notifiers/slack.py`, which leads to a blind server-side request forgery (SSRF). This issue allows for crafting POST requests on behalf of the Medusa server. Version 1.0.19 contains a fix for the issue. |
| CVE-2023-50258 | Medusa is an automatic video library manager for TV shows. Versions prior to 1.0.19 are vulnerable to unauthenticated blind server-side request forgery (SSRF). The `testDiscord` request handler in `medusa/server/web/home/handler.py` does not validate the user-controlled `discord_webhook` variable and passes it to the `notifiers.discord_notifier.test_notify` method, then `_notify_discord` and finally `_send_discord_msg` method, which sends a POST request to the user-controlled URL on line 64 in `/medusa/notifiers/discord.py`, which leads to a blind server-side request forgery. This issue allows for crafting POST requests on behalf of the Medusa server. Version 1.0.19 contains a fix for the issue. |
| CVE-2023-49799 | `nuxt-api-party` is an open source module to proxy API requests. nuxt-api-party attempts to check if the user has passed an absolute URL to prevent the aforementioned attack. This has been recently changed to use the regular expression `^https?://`, however this regular expression can be bypassed by an absolute URL with leading whitespace. For example `\nhttps://whatever.com` which has a leading newline. According to the fetch specification, before a fetch is made the URL is normalized. "To normalize a byte sequence potentialValue, remove any leading and trailing HTTP whitespace bytes from potentialValue.". This means the final request will be normalized to `https://whatever.com` bypassing the check and nuxt-api-party will send a request outside of the whitelist. This could allow us to leak credentials or perform Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). This vulnerability has been addressed in version 0.22.1. Users are advised to upgrade. Users unable to upgrade should revert to the previous method of detecting absolute URLs. |
| CVE-2023-49746 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Softaculous Team SpeedyCache – Cache, Optimization, Performance.This issue affects SpeedyCache – Cache, Optimization, Performance: from n/a through 1.1.2. |
| CVE-2023-49735 | ** UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED ** The value set as the DefaultLocaleResolver.LOCALE_KEY attribute on the session was not validated while resolving XML definition files, leading to possible path traversal and eventually SSRF/XXE when passing user-controlled data to this key. Passing user-controlled data to this key may be relatively common, as it was also used like that to set the language in the 'tiles-test' application shipped with Tiles. This issue affects Apache Tiles from version 2 onwards. NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer. |
| CVE-2023-49471 | Blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in karlomikus Bar Assistant before version 3.2.0 does not validate a parameter before making a request through Image::make(), which could allow authenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary code. |
| CVE-2023-49159 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Elegant Digital Solutions CommentLuv.This issue affects CommentLuv: from n/a through 3.0.4. |
| CVE-2023-48910 | Microcks up to 1.17.1 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the component /jobs and /artifact/download. This vulnerability allows attackers to access network resources and sensitive information via a crafted GET request. |
| CVE-2023-4878 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitHub repository instantsoft/icms2 prior to 2.16.1-git. |
| CVE-2023-48711 | google-translate-api-browser is an npm package which interfaces with the google translate web api. A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) Vulnerability is present in applications utilizing the `google-translate-api-browser` package and exposing the `translateOptions` to the end user. An attacker can set a malicious `tld`, causing the application to return unsafe URLs pointing towards local resources. The `translateOptions.tld` field is not properly sanitized before being placed in the Google translate URL. This can allow an attacker with control over the `translateOptions` to set the `tld` to a payload such as `@127.0.0.1`. This causes the full URL to become `https://translate.google.@127.0.0.1/...`, where `translate.google.` is the username used to connect to localhost. An attacker can send requests within internal networks and the local host. Should any HTTPS application be present on the internal network with a vulnerability exploitable via a GET call, then it would be possible to exploit this using this vulnerability. This issue has been addressed in release version 4.1.3. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. |
| CVE-2023-48379 | Softnext Mail SQR Expert is an email management platform, it has inadequate filtering for a specific URL parameter within a specific function. An unauthenticated remote attacker can perform Blind SSRF attack to discover internal network topology base on URL error response. |
| CVE-2023-48307 | Nextcloud Mail is the mail app for Nextcloud, a self-hosted productivity platform. Starting in version 1.13.0 and prior to version 2.2.8 and 3.3.0, an attacker can use an unprotected endpoint in the Mail app to perform a SSRF attack. Nextcloud Mail app versions 2.2.8 and 3.3.0 contain a patch for this issue. As a workaround, disable the mail app. |
| CVE-2023-48306 | Nextcloud Server provides data storage for Nextcloud, an open source cloud platform. Starting in version 25.0.0 and prior to versions 25.0.11, 26.0.6, and 27.1.0 of Nextcloud Server and starting in version 22.0.0 and prior to versions 22.2.10.16, 23.0.12.11, 24.0.12.7, 25.0.11, 26.0.6, and 27.1.0 of Nextcloud Enterprise Server, the DNS pin middleware was vulnerable to DNS rebinding allowing an attacker to perform SSRF as a final result. Nextcloud Server 25.0.11, 26.0.6, and 27.1.0 and Nextcloud Enterprise Server 22.2.10.16, 23.0.12.11, 24.0.12.7, 25.0.11, 26.0.6, and 27.1.0 contain patches for this issue. No known workarounds are available. |
| CVE-2023-48023 | ** DISPUTED ** Anyscale Ray 2.6.3 and 2.8.0 allows /log_proxy SSRF. NOTE: the vendor's position is that this report is irrelevant because Ray, as stated in its documentation, is not intended for use outside of a strictly controlled network environment |
| CVE-2023-4769 | A SSRF vulnerability has been found in ManageEngine Desktop Central affecting version 9.1.0, specifically the /smtpConfig.do component. This vulnerability could allow an authenticated attacker to launch targeted attacks, such as a cross-port attack, service enumeration and other attacks via HTTP requests. |
| CVE-2023-47116 | Label Studio is a popular open source data labeling tool. The vulnerability affects all versions of Label Studio prior to 1.11.0 and was tested on version 1.8.2. Label Studio's SSRF protections that can be enabled by setting the `SSRF_PROTECTION_ENABLED` environment variable can be bypassed to access internal web servers. This is because the current SSRF validation is done by executing a single DNS lookup to verify that the IP address is not in an excluded subnet range. This protection can be bypassed by either using HTTP redirection or performing a DNS rebinding attack. |
| CVE-2023-46784 | Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal'), Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Room 34 Creative Services, LLC ICS Calendar ics-calendar allows Absolute Path Traversal, : Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects ICS Calendar: from n/a through 10.12.0.3. |
| CVE-2023-46746 | PostHog provides open-source product analytics, session recording, feature flagging and A/B testing that you can self-host. A server-side request forgery (SSRF), which can only be exploited by authenticated users, was found in Posthog. Posthog did not verify whether a URL was local when enabling webhooks, allowing authenticated users to forge a POST request. This vulnerability has been addressed in `22bd5942` and will be included in subsequent releases. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. |
| CVE-2023-46736 | EspoCRM is an Open Source CRM (Customer Relationship Management) software. In affected versions there is Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability via the upload image from url api. Users who have access to `the /Attachment/fromImageUrl` endpoint can specify URL to point to an internal host. Even though there is check for content type, it can be bypassed by redirects in some cases. This SSRF can be leveraged to disclose internal information (in some cases), target internal hosts and bypass firewalls. This vulnerability has been addressed in commit `c536cee63` which is included in release version 8.0.5. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. |
| CVE-2023-46730 | Group-Office is an enterprise CRM and groupware tool. In affected versions there is full Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the /api/upload.php endpoint. The /api/upload.php endpoint does not filter URLs which allows a malicious user to cause the server to make resource requests to untrusted domains. Note that protocols like file:// can also be used to access the server disk. The request result (on success) can then be retrieved using /api/download.php. This issue has been addressed in versions 6.8.15, 6.7.54, and 6.6.177. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. |
| CVE-2023-46725 | FoodCoopShop is open source software for food coops and local shops. Versions starting with 3.2.0 prior to 3.6.1 are vulnerable to server-side request forgery. In the Network module, a manufacturer account can use the `/api/updateProducts.json` endpoint to make the server send a request to an arbitrary host. This means that the server can be used as a proxy into the internal network where the server is. Furthermore, the checks on a valid image are not adequate, leading to a time of check time of use issue. For example, by using a custom server that returns 200 on HEAD requests, then return a valid image on first GET request and then a 302 redirect to final target on second GET request, the server will copy whatever file is at the redirect destination, making this a full SSRF. Version 3.6.1 fixes this vulnerability. |
| CVE-2023-46641 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Code for Recovery 12 Step Meeting List.This issue affects 12 Step Meeting List: from n/a through 3.14.24. |
| CVE-2023-4651 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitHub repository instantsoft/icms2 prior to 2.16.1. |
| CVE-2023-46265 | An unauthenticated could abuse a XXE vulnerability in the Smart Device Server to leak data or perform a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). |
| CVE-2023-46262 | An unauthenticated attacked could send a specifically crafted web request causing a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Ivanti Avalanche Remote Control server. |
| CVE-2023-4624 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitHub repository bookstackapp/bookstack prior to v23.08. |
| CVE-2023-46236 | FOG is a free open-source cloning/imaging/rescue suite/inventory management system. Prior to version 1.5.10, a server-side-request-forgery (SSRF) vulnerability allowed an unauthenticated user to trigger a GET request as the server to an arbitrary endpoint and URL scheme. This also allows remote access to files visible to the Apache user group. Other impacts vary based on server configuration. Version 1.5.10 contains a patch. |
| CVE-2023-46229 | LangChain before 0.0.317 allows SSRF via document_loaders/recursive_url_loader.py because crawling can proceed from an external server to an internal server. |
| CVE-2023-46207 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in StylemixThemes Motors – Car Dealer, Classifieds & Listing.This issue affects Motors – Car Dealer, Classifieds & Listing: from n/a through 1.4.6. |
| CVE-2023-45966 | umputun remark42 version 1.12.1 and before has a Blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. |
| CVE-2023-45705 | An administrative user of WebReports may perform a Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) exploit through SMTP configuration options. |
| CVE-2023-45195 | Adminer and AdminerEvo are vulnerable to SSRF via database connection fields. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to enumerate or access systems the attacker would not otherwise have access to. Adminer is no longer supported, but this issue was fixed in AdminerEvo version 4.8.4. |
| CVE-2023-45152 | Engelsystem is a shift planning system for chaos events. A Blind SSRF in the "Import schedule" functionality makes it possible to perform a port scan against the local environment. This vulnerability has been fixed in commit ee7d30b33. If a patch cannot be deployed, operators should ensure that no HTTP(s) services listen on localhost and/or systems only reachable from the host running the engelsystem software. If such services are necessary, they should utilize additional authentication. |
| CVE-2023-44384 | Discourse-jira is a Discourse plugin allows Jira projects, issue types, fields and field options will be synced automatically. An administrator user can make an SSRF attack by setting the Jira URL to an arbitrary location and enabling the `discourse_jira_verbose_log` site setting. A moderator user could manipulate the request path to the Jira API, allowing them to perform arbitrary GET requests using the Jira API credentials, potentially with elevated permissions, used by the application. |
| CVE-2023-44313 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Apache ServiceComb Service-Center. Attackers can obtain sensitive server information through specially crafted requests.This issue affects Apache ServiceComb before 2.1.0(include). Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.2.0, which fixes the issue. |
| CVE-2023-43982 | Bon Presta boninstagramcarousel between v5.2.1 to v7.0.0 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the url parameter at insta_parser.php. This vulnerability allows attackers to use the vulnerable website as proxy to attack other websites or exfiltrate data via a HTTP call. |
| CVE-2023-43798 | BigBlueButton is an open-source virtual classroom. BigBlueButton prior to versions 2.6.12 and 2.7.0-rc.1 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). This issue is a bypass of CVE-2023-33176. A patch in versions 2.6.12 and 2.7.0-rc.1 disabled follow redirect at `httpclient.execute` since the software no longer has to follow it when using `finalUrl`. There are no known workarounds. We recommend upgrading to a patched version of BigBlueButton. |
| CVE-2023-42439 | GeoNode is an open source platform that facilitates the creation, sharing, and collaborative use of geospatial data. A SSRF vulnerability exists starting in version 3.2.0, bypassing existing controls on the software. This can allow a user to request internal services for a full read SSRF, returning any data from the internal network. The application is using a whitelist, but the whitelist can be bypassed. The bypass will trick the application that the first host is a whitelisted address, but the browser will use `@` or `%40` as a credential to the host geoserver on port 8080, this will return the data to that host on the response. Version 4.1.3.post1 is the first available version that contains a patch. |
| CVE-2023-42282 | The ip package before 1.1.9 for Node.js might allow SSRF because some IP addresses (such as 0x7f.1) are improperly categorized as globally routable via isPublic. |
| CVE-2023-41804 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Brainstorm Force Starter Templates — Elementor, WordPress & Beaver Builder Templates.This issue affects Starter Templates — Elementor, WordPress & Beaver Builder Templates: from n/a through 3.2.4. |
| CVE-2023-41239 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Blubrry PowerPress Podcasting plugin by Blubrry.This issue affects PowerPress Podcasting plugin by Blubrry: from n/a through 11.0.6. |
| CVE-2023-41055 | LibreY is a fork of LibreX, a framework-less and javascript-free privacy respecting meta search engine. LibreY is subject to a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the `engines/google/text.php` and `engines/duckduckgo/text.php` files in versions before commit be59098abd119cda70b15bf3faac596dfd39a744. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to request the server to send HTTP GET requests to arbitrary targets and conduct Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacks via the `wikipedia_language` cookie. Remote attackers can request the server to download large files to reduce the performance of the server or even deny access from legitimate users. This issue has been patched in https://github.com/Ahwxorg/LibreY/pull/9. LibreY hosters are advised to use the latest commit. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. |
| CVE-2023-41054 | LibreY is a fork of LibreX, a framework-less and javascript-free privacy respecting meta search engine. LibreY is subject to a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the `image_proxy.php` file of LibreY before commit 8f9b9803f231e2954e5b49987a532d28fe50a627. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to use the server as a proxy to send HTTP GET requests to arbitrary targets and retrieve information in the internal network or conduct Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacks via the `url` parameter. Remote attackers can use the server as a proxy to send HTTP GET requests and retrieve information in the internal network. Remote attackers can also request the server to download large files or chain requests among multiple instances to reduce the performance of the server or even deny access from legitimate users. This issue has been addressed in https://github.com/Ahwxorg/LibreY/pull/31. LibreY hosters are advised to use the latest commit. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. |
| CVE-2023-40969 | Senayan Library Management Systems SLIMS 9 Bulian v9.6.1 is vulnerable to Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via admin/modules/bibliography/pop_p2p.php. |
| CVE-2023-40743 | ** UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED ** When integrating Apache Axis 1.x in an application, it may not have been obvious that looking up a service through "ServiceFactory.getService" allows potentially dangerous lookup mechanisms such as LDAP. When passing untrusted input to this API method, this could expose the application to DoS, SSRF and even attacks leading to RCE. As Axis 1 has been EOL we recommend you migrate to a different SOAP engine, such as Apache Axis 2/Java. As a workaround, you may review your code to verify no untrusted or unsanitized input is passed to "ServiceFactory.getService", or by applying the patch from https://github.com/apache/axis-axis1-java/commit/7e66753427466590d6def0125e448d2791723210 . The Apache Axis project does not expect to create an Axis 1.x release fixing this problem, though contributors that would like to work towards this are welcome. |
| CVE-2023-40630 | Unauthenticated LFI/SSRF in JCDashboards component for Joomla. |
| CVE-2023-40148 | Server-side request forgery (SSRF) in PingFederate allows unauthenticated http requests to attack network resources and consume server-side resources via forged HTTP POST requests. |
| CVE-2023-40033 | Flarum is an open source forum software. Flarum is affected by a vulnerability that allows an attacker to conduct a Blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attack or disclose any file on the server, even with a basic user account on any Flarum forum. By uploading a file containing a URL and spoofing the MIME type, an attacker can manipulate the application to execute unintended actions. The vulnerability is due to the behavior of the `intervention/image` package, which attempts to interpret the supplied file contents as a URL, which then fetches its contents. This allows an attacker to exploit the vulnerability to perform SSRF attacks, disclose local file contents, or conduct a blind oracle attack. This has been patched in Flarum version 1.8.0. Users are advised to upgrade. Users unable to upgrade may disable PHP's `allow_url_fopen` which will prevent the fetching of external files via URLs as a temporary workaround for the SSRF aspect of the vulnerability. |
| CVE-2023-39854 | The web interface of ATX Ucrypt through 3.5 allows authenticated users (or attackers using default credentials for the admin, master, or user account) to include files via a URL in the /hydra/view/get_cc_url url parameter. There can be resultant SSRF. |
| CVE-2023-3981 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitHub repository omeka/omeka-s prior to 4.0.2. |
| CVE-2023-39313 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in ThemeFusion Avada.This issue affects Avada: from n/a through 7.11.1. |
| CVE-2023-39301 | A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability has been reported to affect several QNAP operating system versions. If exploited, the vulnerability could allow authenticated users to read application data via a network. We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following versions: QTS 5.0.1.2514 build 20230906 and later QTS 5.1.1.2491 build 20230815 and later QuTS hero h5.0.1.2515 build 20230907 and later QuTS hero h5.1.1.2488 build 20230812 and later QuTScloud c5.1.0.2498 and later |
| CVE-2023-39110 | rconfig v3.9.4 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the path parameter at /ajaxGetFileByPath.php. This vulnerability allows authenticated attackers to make arbitrary requests via injection of crafted URLs. |
| CVE-2023-39109 | rconfig v3.9.4 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the path_a parameter in the doDiff Function of /classes/compareClass.php. This vulnerability allows authenticated attackers to make arbitrary requests via injection of crafted URLs. |
| CVE-2023-39108 | rconfig v3.9.4 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the path_b parameter in the doDiff Function of /classes/compareClass.php. This vulnerability allows authenticated attackers to make arbitrary requests via injection of crafted URLs. |
| CVE-2023-38627 | A post-authenticated server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Trend Micro Apex Central 2019 (lower than build 6481) could allow an attacker to interact with internal or local services directly. Please note: an attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. This is a similar, but not identical vulnerability as CVE-2023-38626. |
| CVE-2023-38626 | A post-authenticated server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Trend Micro Apex Central 2019 (lower than build 6481) could allow an attacker to interact with internal or local services directly. Please note: an attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. This is a similar, but not identical vulnerability as CVE-2023-38625. |
| CVE-2023-38625 | A post-authenticated server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Trend Micro Apex Central 2019 (lower than build 6481) could allow an attacker to interact with internal or local services directly. Please note: an attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. This is a similar, but not identical vulnerability as CVE-2023-38624. |
| CVE-2023-38624 | A post-authenticated server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Trend Micro Apex Central 2019 (lower than build 6481) could allow an attacker to interact with internal or local services directly. Please note: an attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. This is a similar, but not identical vulnerability as CVE-2023-38625 through CVE-2023-38627. |
| CVE-2023-38515 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Andy Moyle Church Admin.This issue affects Church Admin: from n/a through 3.7.56. |
| CVE-2023-38490 | Kirby is a content management system. A vulnerability in versions prior to 3.5.8.3, 3.6.6.3, 3.7.5.2, 3.8.4.1, and 3.9.6 only affects Kirby sites that use the `Xml` data handler (e.g. `Data::decode($string, 'xml')`) or the `Xml::parse()` method in site or plugin code. The Kirby core does not use any of the affected methods. XML External Entities (XXE) is a little used feature in the XML markup language that allows to include data from external files in an XML structure. If the name of the external file can be controlled by an attacker, this becomes a vulnerability that can be abused for various system impacts like the disclosure of internal or confidential data that is stored on the server (arbitrary file disclosure) or to perform network requests on behalf of the server (server-side request forgery, SSRF). Kirby's `Xml::parse()` method used PHP's `LIBXML_NOENT` constant, which enabled the processing of XML external entities during the parsing operation. The `Xml::parse()` method is used in the `Xml` data handler (e.g. `Data::decode($string, 'xml')`). Both the vulnerable method and the data handler are not used in the Kirby core. However they may be used in site or plugin code, e.g. to parse RSS feeds or other XML files. If those files are of an external origin (e.g. uploaded by a user or retrieved from an external URL), attackers may be able to include an external entity in the XML file that will then be processed in the parsing process. Kirby sites that don't use XML parsing in site or plugin code are *not* affected. The problem has been patched in Kirby 3.5.8.3, 3.6.6.3, 3.7.5.2, 3.8.4.1, and 3.9.6. In all of the mentioned releases, the maintainers have removed the `LIBXML_NOENT` constant as processing of external entities is out of scope of the parsing logic. This protects all uses of the method against the described vulnerability. |
| CVE-2023-37978 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Dimitar Ivanov HTTP Headers.This issue affects HTTP Headers: from n/a through 1.18.11. |
| CVE-2023-37440 | A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of EdgeConnect SD-WAN Orchestrator could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to conduct a server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack. A successful exploit allows an attacker to enumerate information about the internal structure of the EdgeConnect SD-WAN Orchestrator host leading to potential disclosure of sensitive information. |
| CVE-2023-37379 | Apache Airflow, in versions prior to 2.7.0, contains a security vulnerability that can be exploited by an authenticated user possessing Connection edit privileges. This vulnerability allows the user to access connection information and exploit the test connection feature by sending many requests, leading to a denial of service (DoS) condition on the server. Furthermore, malicious actors can leverage this vulnerability to establish harmful connections with the server. Users of Apache Airflow are strongly advised to upgrade to version 2.7.0 or newer to mitigate the risk associated with this vulnerability. Additionally, administrators are encouraged to review and adjust user permissions to restrict access to sensitive functionalities, reducing the attack surface. |
| CVE-2023-37290 | InfoDoc Document On-line Submission and Approval System lacks sufficient restrictions on the available tags within its HTML to PDF conversion function, and allowing an unauthenticated attackers to load remote or local resources through HTML tags such as iframe. This vulnerability allows unauthenticated remote attackers to perform Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attacks, gaining unauthorized access to arbitrary system files and uncovering the internal network topology. |
| CVE-2023-37230 | Loftware Spectrum (testDeviceConnection) before 5.1 allows SSRF. |
| CVE-2023-37229 | Loftware Spectrum before 5.1 allows SSRF. |
| CVE-2023-36679 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Brainstorm Force Spectra.This issue affects Spectra: from n/a through 2.6.6. |
| CVE-2023-36661 | Shibboleth XMLTooling before 3.2.4, as used in OpenSAML and Shibboleth Service Provider, allows SSRF via a crafted KeyInfo element. (This is fixed in, for example, Shibboleth Service Provider 3.4.1.3 on Windows.) |
| CVE-2023-36388 | Improper REST API permission in Apache Superset up to and including 2.1.0 allows for an authenticated Gamma users to test network connections, possible SSRF. |
| CVE-2023-36088 | Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in NebulaGraph Studio version 3.7.0, allows remote attackers to gain sensitive information. |
| CVE-2023-35896 | IBM Content Navigator 3.0.13 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 259247. |
| CVE-2023-3577 | Mattermost fails to properly restrict requests to localhost/intranet during the interactive dialog, which could allow an attacker to perform a limited blind SSRF. |
| CVE-2023-35175 | Certain HP LaserJet Pro print products are potentially vulnerable to Potential Remote Code Execution and/or Elevation of Privilege via Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) using the Web Service Eventing model. |
| CVE-2023-35133 | An issue in the logic used to check 0.0.0.0 against the cURL blocked hosts lists resulted in an SSRF risk. This flaw affects Moodle versions 4.2, 4.1 to 4.1.3, 4.0 to 4.0.8, 3.11 to 3.11.14, 3.9 to 3.9.21 and earlier unsupported versions. |
| CVE-2023-35011 | IBM Cognos Analytics 11.1.7, 11.2.0, and 11.2.1 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 257705. |
| CVE-2023-34959 | An issue in Chamilo v1.11.* up to v1.11.18 allows attackers to execute a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) and obtain information on the services running on the server via crafted requests in the social and links tools. |
| CVE-2023-34370 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Brainstorm Force Starter Templates — Elementor, WordPress & Beaver Builder Templates, Brainstorm Force Premium Starter Templates.This issue affects Starter Templates — Elementor, WordPress & Beaver Builder Templates: from n/a through 3.2.4; Premium Starter Templates: from n/a through 3.2.4. |
| CVE-2023-3432 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitHub repository plantuml/plantuml prior to 1.2023.9. |
| CVE-2023-34013 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Poll Maker Team Poll Maker – Best WordPress Poll Plugin.This issue affects Poll Maker – Best WordPress Poll Plugin: from n/a through 4.6.2. |
| CVE-2023-33184 | Nextcloud Mail is a mail app in Nextcloud. A blind SSRF attack allowed to send GET requests to services running in the same web server. It is recommended that the Mail app is update to version 3.02, 2.2.5 or 1.15.3. |
| CVE-2023-33176 | BigBlueButton is an open source virtual classroom designed to help teachers teach and learners learn. In affected versions are affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. In an `insertDocument` API request the user is able to supply a URL from which the presentation should be downloaded. This URL was being used without having been successfully validated first. An update to the `followRedirect` method in the `PresentationUrlDownloadService` has been made to validate all URLs to be used for presentation download. Two new properties `presentationDownloadSupportedProtocols` and `presentationDownloadBlockedHosts` have also been added to `bigbluebutton.properties` to allow administrators to define what protocols a URL must use and to explicitly define hosts that a presentation cannot be downloaded from. All URLs passed to `insertDocument` must conform to the requirements of the two previously mentioned properties. Additionally, these URLs must resolve to valid addresses, and these addresses must not be local or loopback addresses. There are no workarounds. Users are advised to upgrade to a patched version of BigBlueButton. |
| CVE-2023-32786 | In Langchain through 0.0.155, prompt injection allows an attacker to force the service to retrieve data from an arbitrary URL, essentially providing SSRF and potentially injecting content into downstream tasks. |
| CVE-2023-32750 | Pydio Cells through 4.1.2 allows SSRF. For longer running processes, Pydio Cells allows for the creation of jobs, which are run in the background. The job "remote-download" can be used to cause the backend to send a HTTP GET request to a specified URL and save the response to a new file. The response file is then available in a user-specified folder in Pydio Cells. |
| CVE-2023-3238 | A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in OTCMS up to 6.62. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /admin/read.php?mudi=getSignal. The manipulation of the argument signalUrl leads to server-side request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier VDB-231509 was assigned to this vulnerability. |
| CVE-2023-3236 | A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in mccms up to 2.6.5. This affects the function pic_save of the file sys/apps/controllers/admin/Comic.php. The manipulation of the argument pic leads to server-side request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-231507. |
| CVE-2023-3235 | A vulnerability was found in mccms up to 2.6.5. It has been rated as critical. Affected by this issue is the function pic_api of the file sys/apps/controllers/admin/Comic.php. The manipulation of the argument url leads to server-side request forgery. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. VDB-231506 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability. |
| CVE-2023-32337 | IBM Maximo Spatial Asset Management 8.10 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 255288. |
| CVE-2023-3233 | A vulnerability was found in Zhong Bang CRMEB up to 4.6.0. It has been classified as critical. Affected is the function get_image_base64 of the file api/controller/v1/PublicController.php. The manipulation leads to server-side request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-231504. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| CVE-2023-3188 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitHub repository owncast/owncast prior to 0.1.0. |
| CVE-2023-31848 | davinci 0.3.0-rc is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF). |
| CVE-2023-31456 | There is an SSRF vulnerability in the Fluid Topics platform that affects versions prior to 4.3, where the server can be forced to make arbitrary requests to internal and external resources by an authenticated user. |
| CVE-2023-31219 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in WPChill Download Monitor.This issue affects Download Monitor: from n/a through 4.8.1. |
| CVE-2023-30444 | IBM Watson Machine Learning on Cloud Pak for Data 4.0 and 4.5 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 253350. |
| CVE-2023-30019 | imgproxy <=3.14.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) due to a lack of sanitization of the imageURL parameter. |
| CVE-2023-29292 | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.6 (and earlier), 2.4.5-p2 (and earlier) and 2.4.4-p3 (and earlier) are affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could lead to arbitrary file system read. An admin-privilege authenticated attacker can force the application to make arbitrary requests via injection of arbitrary URLs. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2023-29291 | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.6 (and earlier), 2.4.5-p2 (and earlier) and 2.4.4-p3 (and earlier) are affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could lead to arbitrary file system read. An admin-privilege authenticated attacker can force the application to make arbitrary requests via injection of arbitrary URLs. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2023-2927 | A vulnerability was found in JIZHICMS 2.4.5. It has been classified as critical. Affected is the function index of the file TemplateController.php. The manipulation of the argument webapi leads to server-side request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. VDB-230082 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability. |
| CVE-2023-29260 | IBM Sterling Connect:Express for UNIX 1.5 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 252135. |
| CVE-2023-28633 | GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 0.84 and prior to versions 9.5.13 and 10.0.7, usage of RSS feeds is subject to server-side request forgery (SSRF). In case the remote address is not a valid RSS feed, an RSS autodiscovery feature is triggered. This feature does not check safety or URLs. Versions 9.5.13 and 10.0.7 contain a patch for this issue. |
| CVE-2023-28155 | ** UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED ** The Request package through 2.88.1 for Node.js allows a bypass of SSRF mitigations via an attacker-controller server that does a cross-protocol redirect (HTTP to HTTPS, or HTTPS to HTTP). NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer. |
| CVE-2023-28112 | Discourse is an open-source discussion platform. Prior to version 3.1.0.beta3 of the `beta` and `tests-passed` branches, some user provided URLs were being passed to FastImage without SSRF protection. Insufficient protections could enable attackers to trigger outbound network connections from the Discourse server to private IP addresses. This affects any site running the `tests-passed` or `beta` branches versions 3.1.0.beta2 and prior. This issue is patched in version 3.1.0.beta3 of the `beta` and `tests-passed` branches. There are no known workarounds. |
| CVE-2023-28111 | Discourse is an open-source discussion platform. Prior to version 3.1.0.beta3 of the `beta` and `tests-passed` branches, attackers are able to bypass Discourse's server-side request forgery (SSRF) protection for private IPv4 addresses by using a IPv4-mapped IPv6 address. The issue is patched in the latest beta and tests-passed version of Discourse. version 3.1.0.beta3 of the `beta` and `tests-passed` branches. There are no known workarounds. |
| CVE-2023-27451 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Darren Cooney Instant Images plugin <= 5.1.0.2 versions. |
| CVE-2023-27163 | request-baskets up to v1.2.1 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the component /api/baskets/{name}. This vulnerability allows attackers to access network resources and sensitive information via a crafted API request. |
| CVE-2023-27162 | openapi-generator up to v6.4.0 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the component /api/gen/clients/{language}. This vulnerability allows attackers to access network resources and sensitive information via a crafted API request. |
| CVE-2023-27161 | Jellyfin up to v10.7.7 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the component /Repositories. This vulnerability allows attackers to access network resources and sensitive information via a crafted POST request. |
| CVE-2023-27160 | forem up to v2022.11.11 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the component /articles/{id}. This vulnerability allows attackers to access network resources and sensitive information via a crafted POST request. |
| CVE-2023-27159 | Appwrite up to v1.2.1 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the component /v1/avatars/favicon. This vulnerability allows attackers to access network resources and sensitive information via a crafted GET request. |
| CVE-2023-26492 | Directus is a real-time API and App dashboard for managing SQL database content. Directus is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) when importing a file from a remote web server (POST to `/files/import`). An attacker can bypass the security controls by performing a DNS rebinding attack and view sensitive data from internal servers or perform a local port scan. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability to access highly sensitive internal server(s) and steal sensitive information. This issue was fixed in version 9.23.0. |
| CVE-2023-26366 | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.7-beta1 (and earlier), 2.4.6-p2 (and earlier), 2.4.5-p4 (and earlier) and 2.4.4-p5 (and earlier) are affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could lead to arbitrary file system read. A high-privileged authenticated attacker can force the application to make arbitrary requests via injection of arbitrary URLs. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction, scope is changed due to the fact that an attacker can enforce file read outside the application's path boundary. |
| CVE-2023-25753 | There exists an SSRF (Server-Side Request Forgery) vulnerability located at the /sandbox/proxyGateway endpoint. This vulnerability allows us to manipulate arbitrary requests and retrieve corresponding responses by inputting any URL into the requestUrl parameter. Of particular concern is our ability to exert control over the HTTP method, cookies, IP address, and headers. This effectively grants us the capability to dispatch complete HTTP requests to hosts of our choosing. This issue affects Apache ShenYu: 2.5.1. Upgrade to Apache ShenYu 2.6.0 or apply patch https://github.com/apache/shenyu/pull/4776 . |
| CVE-2023-25609 | A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability [CWE-918] in FortiManager and FortiAnalyzer GUI 7.2.0 through 7.2.1, 7.0.0 through 7.0.6, 6.4.8 through 6.4.11 may allow a remote and authenticated attacker to access unauthorized files and services on the system via specially crafted web requests. |
| CVE-2023-25504 | A malicious actor who has been authenticated and granted specific permissions in Apache Superset may use the import dataset feature in order to conduct Server-Side Request Forgery attacks and query internal resources on behalf of the server where Superset is deployed. This vulnerability exists in Apache Superset versions up to and including 2.0.1. |
| CVE-2023-25262 | Stimulsoft GmbH Stimulsoft Designer (Web) 2023.1.3 is vulnerable to Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF). TThe Reporting Designer (Web) offers the possibility to embed sources from external locations. If the user chooses an external location, the request to that resource is performed by the server rather than the client. Therefore, the server causes outbound traffic and potentially imports data. An attacker may also leverage this behaviour to exfiltrate data of machines on the internal network of the server hosting the Stimulsoft Reporting Designer (Web). |
| CVE-2023-25230 | A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in loonflow r2.0.14 allows attackers to force the application to make arbitrary requests via manipulation of the hook_url parameter. |
| CVE-2023-25195 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Apache Software Foundation Apache Fineract. Authorized users with limited permissions can gain access to server and may be able to use server for any outbound traffic. This issue affects Apache Fineract: from 1.4 through 1.8.3. |
| CVE-2023-25162 | Nextcloud Server is the file server software for Nextcloud, a self-hosted productivity platform. Nextcloud Server prior to 24.0.8 and 23.0.12 and Nextcloud Enterprise server prior to 24.0.8 and 23.0.12 are vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). Attackers can leverage enclosed alphanumeric payloads to bypass IP filters and gain SSRF, which would allow an attacker to read crucial metadata if the server is hosted on the AWS platform. Nextcloud Server 24.0.8 and 23.0.2 and Nextcloud Enterprise Server 24.0.8 and 23.0.12 contain a patch for this issue. No known workarounds are available. |
| CVE-2023-24623 | Paranoidhttp before 0.3.0 allows SSRF because [::] is equivalent to the 127.0.0.1 address, but does not match the filter for private addresses. |
| CVE-2023-24622 | isInList in the safeurl-python package before 1.2 for Python has an insufficiently restrictive regular expression for external domains, leading to SSRF. |
| CVE-2023-24515 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in API checker of Pandora FMS. Application does not have a check on the URL scheme used while retrieving API URL. Rather than validating the http/https scheme, the application allows other scheme such as file, which could allow a malicious user to fetch internal file content. This issue affects Pandora FMS v767 version and prior versions on all platforms. |
| CVE-2023-24495 | A Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in Tenable.sc due to improper validation of session & user-accessible input data. A privileged, authenticated remote attacker could interact with external and internal services covertly. |
| CVE-2023-24243 | CData RSB Connect v22.0.8336 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). |
| CVE-2023-24060 | Haven 5d15944 allows Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the feed[url]= Feeds functionality. Authenticated users with the ability to create new RSS Feeds or add RSS Feeds can supply an arbitrary hostname (or even the hostname of the Haven server itself). NOTE: this product has significant usage but does not have numbered releases; ordinary end users may typically use the master branch. |
| CVE-2023-23800 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Vova Anokhin WP Shortcodes Plugin — Shortcodes Ultimate.This issue affects WP Shortcodes Plugin — Shortcodes Ultimate: from n/a through 5.12.6. |
| CVE-2023-23684 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in WPGraphQL.This issue affects WPGraphQL: from n/a through 1.14.5. |
| CVE-2023-23560 | In certain Lexmark products through 2023-01-12, SSRF can occur because of a lack of input validation. |
| CVE-2023-22936 | In Splunk Enterprise versions below 8.1.13, 8.2.10, and 9.0.4, the ‘search_listener’ parameter in a search allows for a blind server-side request forgery (SSRF) by an authenticated user. The initiator of the request cannot see the response without the presence of an additional vulnerability within the environment. |
| CVE-2023-22817 | Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow a rogue server on the local network to modify its URL using another DNS address to point back to the loopback adapter. This could then allow the URL to exploit other vulnerabilities on the local server. This was addressed by fixing DNS addresses that refer to loopback. This issue affects My Cloud OS 5 devices before 5.27.161, My Cloud Home, My Cloud Home Duo and SanDisk ibi devices before 9.5.1-104. |
| CVE-2023-22493 | RSSHub is an open source RSS feed generator. RSSHub is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attacks. This vulnerability allows an attacker to send arbitrary HTTP requests from the server to other servers or resources on the network. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by sending a request to the affected routes with a malicious URL. An attacker could also use this vulnerability to send requests to internal or any other servers or resources on the network, potentially gain access to sensitive information that would not normally be accessible and amplifying the impact of the attack. The patch for this issue can be found in commit a66cbcf. |
| CVE-2023-20174 | Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to read arbitrary files or conduct a server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack through an affected device. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker must have valid Administrator credentials on the affected device. For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory. |
| CVE-2023-20173 | Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to read arbitrary files or conduct a server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack through an affected device. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker must have valid Administrator credentials on the affected device. For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory. |
| CVE-2023-20062 | Multiple vulnerabilities in Cisco Unified Intelligence Center could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to collect sensitive information or perform a server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack on an affected system. Cisco plans to release software updates that address these vulnerabilities. |
| CVE-2023-20061 | Multiple vulnerabilities in Cisco Unified Intelligence Center could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to collect sensitive information or perform a server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack on an affected system. Cisco plans to release software updates that address these vulnerabilities. |
| CVE-2023-20030 | A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to access sensitive information, conduct a server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack through an affected device, or negatively impact the responsiveness of the web-based management interface itself. This vulnerability is due to improper handling of XML External Entity (XXE) entries when parsing certain XML files. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by uploading a crafted XML file that contains references to external entities. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to retrieve files from the local system, resulting in the disclosure of confidential information. A successful exploit could also cause the web application to perform arbitrary HTTP requests on behalf of the attacker or consume memory resources to reduce the availability of the web-based management interface. To successfully exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would need valid Super Admin or Policy Admin credentials. |
| CVE-2023-20002 | A vulnerability in Cisco TelePresence CE and RoomOS Software could allow an authenticated, local attacker to bypass access controls and conduct an SSRF attack through an affected device. This vulnerability is due to improper validation of user-supplied input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted request to a user of the web application. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to send arbitrary network requests that are sourced from the affected system. |
| CVE-2023-1977 | The Booking Manager WordPress plugin before 2.0.29 does not validate URLs input in it's admin panel or in shortcodes for showing events from a remote .ics file, allowing an attacker with privileges as low as Subscriber to perform SSRF attacks on the sites internal network. |
| CVE-2023-1938 | The WP Fastest Cache WordPress plugin before 1.1.5 does not have CSRF check in an AJAX action, and does not validate user input before using it in the wp_remote_get() function, leading to a Blind SSRF issue |
| CVE-2023-1725 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Infoline Project Management System allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Project Management System: before 4.09.31.125. |
| CVE-2023-1634 | A vulnerability was found in OTCMS 6.72. It has been classified as critical. Affected is the function UseCurl of the file /admin/info_deal.php of the component URL Parameter Handler. The manipulation leads to server-side request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-224016. |
| CVE-2023-0574 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes, Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts vulnerability in YugaByte, Inc. Yugabyte Managed allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs, Communication Channel Manipulation, Authentication Abuse.This issue affects Yugabyte Managed: from 2.0.0.0 through 2.13.0.0 |
| CVE-2022-48477 | In JetBrains Hub before 2023.1.15725 SSRF protection in Auth Module integration was missing |
| CVE-2022-48321 | Limited Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in agent-receiver in Tribe29's Checkmk <= 2.1.0p11 allows an attacker to communicate with local network restricted endpoints by use of the host registration API. |
| CVE-2022-47873 | Netcad KEOS 1.0 is vulnerable to XML External Entity (XXE) resulting in SSRF with XXE (remote). |
| CVE-2022-47872 | A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in maccms10 v2021.1000.2000 allows attackers to force the application to make arbitrary requests via a crafted payload injected into the Name parameter under the Interface address module. |
| CVE-2022-47635 | Wildix WMS 6 before 6.02.20221216, WMS 5 before 5.04.20221214, and WMS4 before 4.04.45396.23 allows Server-side request forgery (SSRF) via ZohoClient.php. |
| CVE-2022-47514 | An XML external entity (XXE) injection vulnerability in XML-RPC.NET before 2.5.0 allows remote authenticated users to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks, as demonstrated by a pingback.aspx POST request. |
| CVE-2022-46998 | An issue in the website background of taocms v3.0.2 allows attackers to execute a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). |
| CVE-2022-46973 | Report v0.9.8.6 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. |
| CVE-2022-46827 | In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2022.3 an XXE attack leading to SSRF via requests to custom plugin repositories was possible. |
| CVE-2022-46364 | A SSRF vulnerability in parsing the href attribute of XOP:Include in MTOM requests in versions of Apache CXF before 3.5.5 and 3.4.10 allows an attacker to perform SSRF style attacks on webservices that take at least one parameter of any type. |
| CVE-2022-45835 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in PhonePe PhonePe Payment Solutions.This issue affects PhonePe Payment Solutions: from n/a through 1.0.15. |
| CVE-2022-45429 | Some Dahua software products have a vulnerability of server-side request forgery (SSRF). An Attacker can access internal resources by concatenating links (URL) that conform to specific rules. |
| CVE-2022-45362 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Paytm Paytm Payment Gateway.This issue affects Paytm Payment Gateway: from n/a through 2.7.0. |
| CVE-2022-45326 | An XML external entity (XXE) injection vulnerability in Kwoksys Kwok Information Server before v2.9.5.SP31 allows remote authenticated users to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks. |
| CVE-2022-45152 | A blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was found in Moodle. This flaw exists due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input in LTI provider library. The library does not utilise Moodle's inbuilt cURL helper, which resulted in a blind SSRF risk. An attacker can send a specially crafted HTTP request and trick the application to initiate requests to arbitrary systems. This vulnerability allows a remote attacker to perform SSRF attacks. |
| CVE-2022-45085 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Group Arge Energy and Control Systems Smartpower Web allows : Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Smartpower Web: before 23.01.01. |
| CVE-2022-44784 | An issue was discovered in Appalti & Contratti 9.12.2. The target web applications LFS and DL229 expose a set of services provided by the Axis 1.4 instance, embedded directly into the applications, as hinted by the WEB-INF/web.xml file leaked through Local File Inclusion. Among the exposed services, there is the Axis AdminService, which, through the default configuration, should normally be accessible only by the localhost. Nevertheless, by trying to access the mentioned service, both in LFS and DL229, the service can actually be reached even by remote users, allowing creation of arbitrary services on the server side. When an attacker can reach the AdminService, they can use it to instantiate arbitrary services on the server. The exploit procedure is well known and described in Generic AXIS-SSRF exploitation. Basically, the attack consists of writing a JSP page inside the root directory of the web application, through the org.apache.axis.handlers.LogHandler class. |
| CVE-2022-44730 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Apache Software Foundation Apache XML Graphics Batik.This issue affects Apache XML Graphics Batik: 1.16. A malicious SVG can probe user profile / data and send it directly as parameter to a URL. |
| CVE-2022-44729 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Apache Software Foundation Apache XML Graphics Batik.This issue affects Apache XML Graphics Batik: 1.16. On version 1.16, a malicious SVG could trigger loading external resources by default, causing resource consumption or in some cases even information disclosure. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.17 or later. |
| CVE-2022-43699 | OX App Suite before 7.10.6-rev30 allows SSRF because e-mail account discovery disregards the deny-list and thus can be attacked by an adversary who controls the DNS records of an external domain (found in the host part of an e-mail address). |
| CVE-2022-43698 | OX App Suite before 7.10.6-rev30 allows SSRF because changing a POP3 account disregards the deny-list. |
| CVE-2022-43473 | A blind XML External Entity (XXE) vulnerability exists in the Add UCS Device functionality of ManageEngine OpManager 12.6.168. A specially crafted XML file can lead to SSRF. An attacker can serve a malicious XML payload to trigger this vulnerability. |
| CVE-2022-4335 | A blind SSRF vulnerability was identified in all versions of GitLab EE prior to 15.4.6, 15.5 prior to 15.5.5, and 15.6 prior to 15.6.1 which allows an attacker to connect to a local host. |
| CVE-2022-43183 | XXL-Job before v2.3.1 contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the component /admin/controller/JobLogController.java. |
| CVE-2022-43140 | kkFileView v4.1.0 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the component cn.keking.web.controller.OnlinePreviewController#getCorsFile. This vulnerability allows attackers to force the application to make arbitrary requests via injection of crafted URLs into the url parameter. |
| CVE-2022-42894 | A vulnerability has been identified in syngo Dynamics (All versions < VA40G HF01). An unauthenticated Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was identified in one of the web services exposed on the syngo Dynamics application that could allow for the leaking of NTLM credentials as well as local service enumeration. |
| CVE-2022-42494 | Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in All in One SEO Pro plugin <= 4.2.5.1 on WordPress. |
| CVE-2022-42343 | Adobe Campaign version 7.3.1 (and earlier) and 8.3.9 (and earlier) are affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could lead to arbitrary file system read. A low-privilege authenticated attacker can force the application to make arbitrary requests via injection of arbitrary URLs. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2022-42183 | Precisely Spectrum Spatial Analyst 20.01 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). |
| CVE-2022-42149 | kkFileView 4.0 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF) via controller\OnlinePreviewController.java. |
| CVE-2022-4201 | A blind SSRF in GitLab CE/EE affecting all from 11.3 prior to 15.4.6, 15.5 prior to 15.5.5, and 15.6 prior to 15.6.1 allows an attacker to connect to local addresses when configuring a malicious GitLab Runner. |
| CVE-2022-41906 | OpenSearch Notifications is a notifications plugin for OpenSearch that enables other plugins to send notifications via Email, Slack, Amazon Chime, Custom web-hook etc channels. A potential SSRF issue in OpenSearch Notifications Plugin starting in 2.0.0 and prior to 2.2.1 could allow an existing privileged user to enumerate listening services or interact with configured resources via HTTP requests exceeding the Notification plugin's intended scope. OpenSearch 2.2.1+ contains the fix for this issue. There are currently no recommended workarounds. |
| CVE-2022-41609 | Auth. (subscriber+) Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Better Messages plugin 1.9.10.68 on WordPress. |
| CVE-2022-41552 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Hitachi Infrastructure Analytics Advisor on Linux (Data Center Analytics, Analytics probe components), Hitachi Ops Center Analyzer on Linux (Hitachi Ops Center Analyzer detail view, Hitachi Ops Center Analyzer probe components) allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects Hitachi Infrastructure Analytics Advisor: from 2.0.0-00 through 4.4.0-00; Hitachi Ops Center Analyzer: from 10.0.0-00 before 10.9.0-00. |
| CVE-2022-41497 | ClipperCMS 1.3.3 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the pkg_url parameter at /manager/index.php. |
| CVE-2022-41496 | iCMS v7.0.16 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the url parameter at admincp.php. |
| CVE-2022-41495 | ClipperCMS 1.3.3 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the rss_url_news parameter at /manager/index.php. |
| CVE-2022-41477 | A security issue was discovered in WeBid <=1.2.2. A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the admin/theme.php file allows remote attackers to inject payloads via theme parameters to read files across directories. |
| CVE-2022-41412 | An issue in the graphData.cgi component of perfSONAR v4.4.5 and prior allows attackers to access sensitive data and execute Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attacks. |
| CVE-2022-41401 | OpenRefine <= v3.5.2 contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability, which permits unauthorized users to exploit the system, potentially leading to unauthorized access to internal resources and sensitive file disclosure. |
| CVE-2022-4096 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitHub repository appsmithorg/appsmith prior to 1.8.2. |
| CVE-2022-40842 | ndk design NdkAdvancedCustomizationFields 3.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF) via rotateimg.php. |
| CVE-2022-40700 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Montonio Montonio for WooCommerce, Wpopal Wpopal Core Features, AMO for WP – Membership Management ArcStone wp-amo, Long Watch Studio WooVirtualWallet – A virtual wallet for WooCommerce, Long Watch Studio WooVIP – Membership plugin for WordPress and WooCommerce, Long Watch Studio WooSupply – Suppliers, Supply Orders and Stock Management, Squidesma Theme Minifier, Paul Clark Styles styles, Designmodo Inc. WordPress Page Builder – Qards, Philip M. Hofer (Frumph) PHPFreeChat, Arun Basil Lal Custom Login Admin Front-end CSS, Team Agence-Press CSS Adder By Agence-Press, Unihost Confirm Data, deano1987 AMP Toolbox amp-toolbox, Arun Basil Lal Admin CSS MU.This issue affects Montonio for WooCommerce: from n/a through 6.0.1; Wpopal Core Features: from n/a through 1.5.8; ArcStone: from n/a through 4.6.6; WooVirtualWallet – A virtual wallet for WooCommerce: from n/a through 2.2.1; WooVIP – Membership plugin for WordPress and WooCommerce: from n/a through 1.4.4; WooSupply – Suppliers, Supply Orders and Stock Management: from n/a through 1.2.2; Theme Minifier: from n/a through 2.0; Styles: from n/a through 1.2.3; WordPress Page Builder – Qards: from n/a through 1.0.5; PHPFreeChat: from n/a through 0.2.8; Custom Login Admin Front-end CSS: from n/a through 1.4.1; CSS Adder By Agence-Press: from n/a through 1.5.0; Confirm Data: from n/a through 1.0.7; AMP Toolbox: from n/a through 2.1.1; Admin CSS MU: from n/a through 2.6. |
| CVE-2022-40357 | A security issue was discovered in Z-BlogPHP <= 1.7.2. A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the zb_users/plugin/UEditor/php/action_crawler.php file allows remote attackers to force the application to make arbitrary requests via injection of arbitrary URLs into the source parameter. |
| CVE-2022-40312 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in GiveWP GiveWP – Donation Plugin and Fundraising Platform.This issue affects GiveWP – Donation Plugin and Fundraising Platform: from n/a through 2.25.1. |
| CVE-2022-40146 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Batik of Apache XML Graphics allows an attacker to access files using a Jar url. This issue affects Apache XML Graphics Batik 1.14. |
| CVE-2022-40083 | Labstack Echo v4.8.0 was discovered to contain an open redirect vulnerability via the Static Handler component. This vulnerability can be leveraged by attackers to cause a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). |
| CVE-2022-3980 | An XML External Entity (XEE) vulnerability allows server-side request forgery (SSRF) and potential code execution in Sophos Mobile managed on-premises between versions 5.0.0 and 9.7.4. |
| CVE-2022-39383 | KubeVela is an open source application delivery platform. Users using the VelaUX APIServer could be affected by this vulnerability. When using Helm Chart as the component delivery method, the request address of the warehouse is not restricted, and there is a blind SSRF vulnerability. Users who're using v1.6, please update the v1.6.1. Users who're using v1.5, please update the v1.5.8. There are no known workarounds for this issue. |
| CVE-2022-39276 | GLPI stands for Gestionnaire Libre de Parc Informatique. GLPI is a Free Asset and IT Management Software package that provides ITIL Service Desk features, licenses tracking and software auditing. Usage of RSS feeds or an external calendar in planning is subject to SSRF exploit. In case a remote script returns a redirect response, the redirect target URL is not checked against the URL allow list defined by administrator. This issue has been patched, please upgrade to 10.0.4. There are currently no known workarounds. |
| CVE-2022-39055 | RAVA certificate validation system has inadequate filtering for URL parameter. An unauthenticated remote attacker can perform SSRF attack to discover internal network topology base on query response. |
| CVE-2022-39039 | aEnrich’s a+HRD has inadequate filtering for specific URL parameter. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability to send arbitrary HTTP(s) request to launch Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attack, to perform arbitrary system command or disrupt service. |
| CVE-2022-38931 | A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in fetch_net_file_upload function of baijiacmsV4 v4.1.4 allows remote attackers to force the application to make arbitrary requests via injection of arbitrary URLs into the url parameter. |
| CVE-2022-38708 | IBM Cognos Analytics 11.1.7 11.2.0, and 11.2.1 could be vulnerable to a Server-Side Request Forgery Attack (SSRF) attack by constructing URLs from user-controlled data. This could enable attackers to make arbitrary requests to the internal network or to the local file system. IBM X-Force ID: 234180. |
| CVE-2022-38648 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Batik of Apache XML Graphics allows an attacker to fetch external resources. This issue affects Apache XML Graphics Batik 1.14. |
| CVE-2022-38580 | Zalando Skipper v0.13.236 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). |
| CVE-2022-3841 | RHACM: unauthenticated SSRF in console API endpoint. A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was found in the console API endpoint from Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes (RHACM). An attacker could take advantage of this as the console API endpoint is missing an authentication check, allowing unauthenticated users making requests. |
| CVE-2022-38398 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Batik of Apache XML Graphics allows an attacker to load a url thru the jar protocol. This issue affects Apache XML Graphics Batik 1.14. |
| CVE-2022-38342 | Safe Software FME Server v2021.2.5, v2022.0.0.2 and below was discovered to contain a XML External Entity (XXE) vulnerability which allows authenticated attackers to perform data exfiltration or Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attacks. |
| CVE-2022-38298 | Appsmith v1.7.11 was discovered to allow attackers to execute an authenticated Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via redirecting incoming requests to the AWS internal metadata endpoint. |
| CVE-2022-38212 | Protections against potential Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerabilities in Esri Portal for ArcGIS versions 10.8.1 and below were not fully honored and may allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to forge requests to arbitrary URLs from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or reading from hosts inside the network perimeter, a different issue than CVE-2022-38211 and CVE-2022-38203. |
| CVE-2022-38211 | Protections against potential Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerabilities in Esri Portal for ArcGIS versions 10.9.1 and below were not fully honored and may allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to forge requests to arbitrary URLs from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or reading from hosts inside the network perimeter, a different issue than CVE-2022-38211 and CVE-2022-38212. |
| CVE-2022-38203 | Protections against potential Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerabilities in Esri Portal for ArcGIS versions 10.8.1 and below were not fully honored and may allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to forge requests to arbitrary URLs from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or reading from hosts inside the network perimeter, a different issue than CVE-2022-38211 and CVE-2022-38212. |
| CVE-2022-37313 | OX App Suite through 7.10.6 allows SSRF because the anti-SSRF protection mechanism only checks the first DNS AA or AAAA record. |
| CVE-2022-37033 | In dotCMS 5.x-22.06, TempFileAPI allows a user to create a temporary file based on a passed in URL, while attempting to block any SSRF access to local IP addresses or private subnets. In resolving this URL, the TempFileAPI follows any 302 redirects that the remote URL returns. Because there is no re-validation of the redirect URL, the TempFileAPI can be used to return data from those local/private hosts that should not be accessible remotely. |
| CVE-2022-36997 | An issue was discovered in Veritas NetBackup 8.1.x through 8.1.2, 8.2, 8.3.x through 8.3.0.2, 9.x through 9.0.0.1, and 9.1.x through 9.1.0.1 (and related NetBackup products). An attacker with authenticated access to a NetBackup Client could remotely trigger impacts that include arbitrary file read, Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), and denial of service. |
| CVE-2022-36663 | Gluu Oxauth before v4.4.1 allows attackers to execute blind SSRF (Server-Side Request Forgery) attacks via a crafted request_uri parameter. |
| CVE-2022-36551 | A Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the Data Import module in Heartex - Label Studio Community Edition versions 1.5.0 and earlier allows an authenticated user to access arbitrary files on the system. Furthermore, self-registration is enabled by default in these versions of Label Studio enabling a remote attacker to create a new account and then exploit the SSRF. |
| CVE-2022-36451 | A vulnerability in the MiCollab Client server component of Mitel MiCollab through 9.5.0.101 could allow an authenticated attacker to conduct a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attack due to insufficient restriction of URL parameters. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to leverage connections and permissions available to the host server. |
| CVE-2022-36376 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Rank Math SEO plugin <= 1.0.95 at WordPress. |
| CVE-2022-36112 | GLPI stands for Gestionnaire Libre de Parc Informatique and is a Free Asset and IT Management Software package, that provides ITIL Service Desk features, licenses tracking and software auditing. Usage of RSS feeds or extenal calendar in planning is subject to SSRF exploit. Server-side requests can be used to scan server port or services opened on GLPI server or its private network. Queries responses are not exposed to end-user (blind SSRF). Users are advised to upgrade to version 10.0.3 to resolve this issue. There are no known workarounds. |
| CVE-2022-35949 | undici is an HTTP/1.1 client, written from scratch for Node.js.`undici` is vulnerable to SSRF (Server-side Request Forgery) when an application takes in **user input** into the `path/pathname` option of `undici.request`. If a user specifies a URL such as `http://127.0.0.1` or `//127.0.0.1` ```js const undici = require("undici") undici.request({origin: "http://example.com", pathname: "//127.0.0.1"}) ``` Instead of processing the request as `http://example.org//127.0.0.1` (or `http://example.org/http://127.0.0.1` when `http://127.0.0.1 is used`), it actually processes the request as `http://127.0.0.1/` and sends it to `http://127.0.0.1`. If a developer passes in user input into `path` parameter of `undici.request`, it can result in an _SSRF_ as they will assume that the hostname cannot change, when in actual fact it can change because the specified path parameter is combined with the base URL. This issue was fixed in `undici@5.8.1`. The best workaround is to validate user input before passing it to the `undici.request` call. |
| CVE-2022-3590 | WordPress is affected by an unauthenticated blind SSRF in the pingback feature. Because of a TOCTOU race condition between the validation checks and the HTTP request, attackers can reach internal hosts that are explicitly forbidden. |
| CVE-2022-35741 | Apache CloudStack version 4.5.0 and later has a SAML 2.0 authentication Service Provider plugin which is found to be vulnerable to XML external entity (XXE) injection. This plugin is not enabled by default and the attacker would require that this plugin be enabled to exploit the vulnerability. When the SAML 2.0 plugin is enabled in affected versions of Apache CloudStack could potentially allow the exploitation of XXE vulnerabilities. The SAML 2.0 messages constructed during the authentication flow in Apache CloudStack are XML-based and the XML data is parsed by various standard libraries that are now understood to be vulnerable to XXE injection attacks such as arbitrary file reading, possible denial of service, server-side request forgery (SSRF) on the CloudStack management server. |
| CVE-2022-35651 | A stored XSS and blind SSRF vulnerability was found in Moodle, occurs due to insufficient sanitization of user-supplied data in the SCORM track details. A remote attacker can trick the victim to follow a specially crafted link and execute arbitrary HTML and script code in user's browser in context of vulnerable website to steal potentially sensitive information, change appearance of the web page, can perform phishing and drive-by-download attacks. |
| CVE-2022-35583 | wkhtmlTOpdf 0.12.6 is vulnerable to SSRF which allows an attacker to get initial access into the target's system by injecting iframe tag with initial asset IP address on it's source. This allows the attacker to takeover the whole infrastructure by accessing their internal assets. |
| CVE-2022-35508 | Proxmox Virtual Environment (PVE) and Proxmox Mail Gateway (PMG) are vulnerable to SSRF when proxying HTTP requests between pve(pmg)proxy and pve(pmg)daemon. An attacker with an unprivileged account can craft an HTTP request to achieve SSRF and file disclosure of any files on the server. Also, in Proxmox Mail Gateway, privilege escalation to the root@pam account is possible if the backup feature has ever been used, because backup files such as pmg-backup_YYYY_MM_DD_*.tgz have 0644 permissions and contain an authkey value. This is fixed in pve-http-server 4.1-3. |
| CVE-2022-35282 | IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0, 8.0, 8.5, and 9.0 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). By sending a specially crafted request, an attacker with local network access could exploit this vulnerability to obtain sensitive data. |
| CVE-2022-34269 | An issue was discovered in RWS WorldServer before 11.7.3. An authenticated, remote attacker can perform a ws-legacy/load_dtd?system_id= blind SSRF attack to deploy JSP code to the Apache Axis service running on the localhost interface, leading to command execution. |
| CVE-2022-34013 | OneBlog v2.3.4 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability via the Logo parameter under the Link module. |
| CVE-2022-34011 | OneBlog v2.3.4 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability via the parameter entryUrls. |
| CVE-2022-32995 | Halo CMS v1.5.3 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the template remote download function. |
| CVE-2022-32533 | ** UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED ** Apache Jetspeed-2 does not sufficiently filter untrusted user input by default leading to a number of issues including XSS, CSRF, XXE, and SSRF. Setting the configuration option "xss.filter.post = true" may mitigate these issues. NOTE: Apache Jetspeed is a dormant project of Apache Portals and no updates will be provided for this issue. |
| CVE-2022-3247 | The Blog2Social: Social Media Auto Post & Scheduler WordPress plugin before 6.9.10 does not have authorisation in an AJAX action, and does not ensure that the URL to make a request to is an external one. As a result, any authenticated users, such as subscriber could perform SSRF attacks |
| CVE-2022-32457 | Digiwin BPM has inadequate filtering for URL parameter. An unauthenticated remote attacker can perform Blind SSRF attack to discover internal network topology base on URL error response. |
| CVE-2022-31830 | Kity Minder v1.3.5 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the init function at ImageCapture.class.php. |
| CVE-2022-31827 | MonstaFTP v2.10.3 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the function performFetchRequest at HTTPFetcher.php. |
| CVE-2022-31776 | IBM DataPower Gateway 10.0.2.0 through 10.0.4.0, 10.0.1.0 through 10.0.1.8, 10.5.0.0, and 2018.4.1.0 through 2018.4.1.21 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 228433. |
| CVE-2022-31393 | Jizhicms v2.2.5 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability via the Index function in app/admin/c/PluginsController.php. |
| CVE-2022-31390 | Jizhicms v2.2.5 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability via the Update function in app/admin/c/TemplateController.php. |
| CVE-2022-31386 | A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the getFileBinary function of nbnbk cms 3 allows attackers to force the application to make arbitrary requests via injection of arbitrary URLs into the URL parameter. |
| CVE-2022-31196 | Databasir is a database metadata management platform. Databasir <= 1.06 has Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. The SSRF is triggered by a sending a **single** HTTP POST request to create a databaseType. By supplying a `jdbcDriverFileUrl` that returns a non `200` response code, the url is executed, the response is logged (both in terminal and in database) and is included in the response. This would allow an attackers to obtain the real IP address and scan Intranet information. This issue was fixed in version 1.0.7. |
| CVE-2022-31188 | CVAT is an opensource interactive video and image annotation tool for computer vision. Versions prior to 2.0.0 were found to be subject to a Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. Validation has been added to urls used in the affected code path in version 2.0.0. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this issue. |
| CVE-2022-31132 | Nextcloud Mail is an email application for the nextcloud personal cloud product. Affected versions shipped with a CSS minifier on the path `./vendor/cerdic/css-tidy/css_optimiser.php`. Access to the minifier is unrestricted and access may lead to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). It is recommendet to upgrade to Mail 1.12.7 or Mail 1.13.6. Users unable to upgrade may manually delete the file located at `./vendor/cerdic/css-tidy/css_optimiser.php` |
| CVE-2022-30579 | The Web Player component of TIBCO Software Inc.'s TIBCO Spotfire Analytics Platform for AWS Marketplace and TIBCO Spotfire Server contains a difficult to exploit vulnerability that allows a low privileged attacker with network access to execute blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) on the affected system. Affected releases are TIBCO Software Inc.'s TIBCO Spotfire Analytics Platform for AWS Marketplace: version 12.0.0 and TIBCO Spotfire Server: version 12.0.0. |
| CVE-2022-30049 | A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Rebuild v2.8.3 allows attackers to obtain the real IP address and scan Intranet information via the fileurl parameter. |
| CVE-2022-29942 | Talend Administration Center has a vulnerability that allows an authenticated user to use the Service Registry 'Add' functionality to perform SSRF HTTP GET requests on URLs in the internal network. The issue is fixed for versions 8.0.x in TPS-5189, versions 7.3.x in TPS-5175, and versions 7.2.x in TPS-5201. Earlier versions of Talend Administration Center may also be impacted; users are encouraged to update to a supported version. |
| CVE-2022-29840 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow a rogue server on the local network to modify its URL to point back to the loopback adapter was addressed in Western Digital My Cloud OS 5 devices. This could allow the URL to exploit other vulnerabilities on the local server.This issue affects My Cloud OS 5 devices before 5.26.202. |
| CVE-2022-29631 | Jodd HTTP v6.0.9 was discovered to contain multiple CLRF injection vulnerabilities via the components jodd.http.HttpRequest#set and `jodd.http.HttpRequest#send. These vulnerabilities allow attackers to execute Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via a crafted TCP payload. |
| CVE-2022-29556 | The iot-manager microservice 1.0.0 in Northern.tech Mender Enterprise before 3.2.2 allows SSRF because the Azure IoT Hub integration provides several SSRF primitives that can execute cross-tenant actions via internal API endpoints. |
| CVE-2022-29188 | Smokescreen is an HTTP proxy. The primary use case for Smokescreen is to prevent server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks in which external attackers leverage the behavior of applications to connect to or scan internal infrastructure. Smokescreen also offers an option to deny access to additional (e.g., external) URLs by way of a deny list. There was an issue in Smokescreen that made it possible to bypass the deny list feature by surrounding the hostname with square brackets (e.g. `[example.com]`). This only impacted the HTTP proxy functionality of Smokescreen. HTTPS requests were not impacted. Smokescreen version 0.0.4 contains a patch for this issue. |
| CVE-2022-2912 | The Craw Data WordPress plugin through 1.0.0 does not implement nonce checks, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change the url value performing unwanted crawls on third-party sites (SSRF). |
| CVE-2022-2900 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitHub repository ionicabizau/parse-url prior to 8.1.0. |
| CVE-2022-28997 | CSZCMS v1.3.0 allows attackers to execute a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) which can be leveraged to leak sensitive data via a local file inclusion at /admin/filemanager/connector/. |
| CVE-2022-28616 | A remote server-side request forgery (ssrf) vulnerability was discovered in HPE OneView version(s): Prior to 7.0. HPE has provided a software update to resolve this vulnerability in HPE OneView. |
| CVE-2022-28217 | Some part of SAP NetWeaver (EP Web Page Composer) does not sufficiently validate an XML document accepted from an untrusted source, which allows an adversary to exploit unprotected XML parking at endpoints, and a possibility to conduct SSRF attacks that could compromise system�s Availability by causing system to crash. |
| CVE-2022-28117 | A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in feed_parser class of Navigate CMS v2.9.4 allows remote attackers to force the application to make arbitrary requests via injection of arbitrary URLs into the feed parameter. |
| CVE-2022-28090 | Jspxcms v10.2.0 allows attackers to execute a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via /cmscp/ext/collect/fetch_url.do?url=. |
| CVE-2022-27907 | Sonatype Nexus Repository Manager 3.x before 3.38.0 allows SSRF. |
| CVE-2022-27622 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Package Center functionality in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 7.1-42661 allows remote authenticated users to access intranet resources via unspecified vectors. |
| CVE-2022-2756 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitHub repository kareadita/kavita prior to 0.5.4.1. |
| CVE-2022-27469 | Monstaftp v2.10.3 was discovered to allow attackers to execute Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). |
| CVE-2022-27429 | Jizhicms v1.9.5 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability via /admin.php/Plugins/update.html. |
| CVE-2022-27426 | A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Chamilo LMS v1.11.13 allows attackers to enumerate the internal network and execute arbitrary system commands via a crafted Phar file. |
| CVE-2022-27311 | Gibbon v3.4.4 and below allows attackers to execute a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via a crafted URL. |
| CVE-2022-27245 | An issue was discovered in MISP before 2.4.156. app/Model/Server.php does not restrict generateServerSettings to the CLI. This could lead to SSRF. |
| CVE-2022-26499 | An SSRF issue was discovered in Asterisk through 19.x. When using STIR/SHAKEN, it's possible to send arbitrary requests (such as GET) to interfaces such as localhost by using the Identity header. This is fixed in 16.25.2, 18.11.2, and 19.3.2. |
| CVE-2022-26088 | An issue was discovered in BMC Remedy before 22.1. Email-based Incident Forwarding allows remote authenticated users to inject HTML (such as an SSRF payload) into the Activity Log by placing it in the To: field. This affects rendering that occurs upon a click in the "number of recipients" field. NOTE: the vendor's position is that "no real impact is demonstrated." |
| CVE-2022-25876 | The package link-preview-js before 2.1.16 are vulnerable to Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF) which allows attackers to send arbitrary requests to the local network and read the response. This is due to flawed DNS rebinding protection. |
| CVE-2022-25850 | The package github.com/hoppscotch/proxyscotch before 1.0.0 are vulnerable to Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF) when interceptor mode is set to proxy. It occurs when an HTTP request is made by a backend server to an untrusted URL submitted by a user. It leads to a leakage of sensitive information from the server. |
| CVE-2022-25801 | Best Practical RT for Incident Response (RTIR) before 4.0.3 and 5.x before 5.0.3 allows SSRF via Scripted Action tools. |
| CVE-2022-25800 | Best Practical RT for Incident Response (RTIR) before 4.0.3 and 5.x before 5.0.3 allows SSRF via the whois lookup tool. |
| CVE-2022-25777 | Prior to the patched version, an authenticated user of Mautic could read system files and access the internal addresses of the application due to a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. |
| CVE-2022-25260 | JetBrains Hub before 2021.1.14276 was vulnerable to blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). |
| CVE-2022-25026 | A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Rocket TRUfusion Portal v7.9.2.1 allows remote attackers to gain access to sensitive resources on the internal network via a crafted HTTP request to /trufusionPortal/upDwModuleProxy. |
| CVE-2022-24980 | An issue was discovered in the Kitodo.Presentation (aka dif) extension before 2.3.2, 3.x before 3.2.3, and 3.3.x before 3.3.4 for TYPO3. A missing access check in an eID script allows an unauthenticated user to submit arbitrary URLs to this component. This results in SSRF, allowing attackers to view the content of any file or webpage the webserver has access to. |
| CVE-2022-24969 | bypass CVE-2021-25640 > In Apache Dubbo prior to 2.6.12 and 2.7.15, the usage of parseURL method will lead to the bypass of the white host check which can cause open redirect or SSRF vulnerability. |
| CVE-2022-24862 | Databasir is a team-oriented relational database model document management platform. Databasir 1.01 has Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability. During the download verification process of a JDBC driver the corresponding JDBC driver download address will be downloaded first, but this address will return a response page with complete error information when accessing a non-existent URL. Attackers can take advantage of this feature for SSRF. |
| CVE-2022-24856 | FlyteConsole is the web user interface for the Flyte platform. FlyteConsole prior to version 0.52.0 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF) when FlyteConsole is open to the general internet. An attacker can exploit any user of a vulnerable instance to access the internal metadata server or other unauthenticated URLs. Passing of headers to an unauthorized actor may occur. The patch for this issue deletes the entire `cors_proxy`, as this is not required for console anymore. A patch is available in FlyteConsole version 0.52.0. Disable FlyteConsole availability on the internet as a workaround. |
| CVE-2022-24825 | Smokescreen is a simple HTTP proxy that fogs over naughty URLs. The primary use case for Smokescreen is to prevent server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks in which external attackers leverage the behavior of applications to connect to or scan internal infrastructure. Smokescreen also offers an option to deny access to additional (e.g., external) URLs by way of a deny list. There was an issue in Smokescreen that made it possible to bypass the deny list feature by appending a dot to the end of user-supplied URLs, or by providing input in a different letter case. Recommended to upgrade Smokescreen to version 0.0.3 or later. |
| CVE-2022-24789 | C1 CMS is an open-source, .NET based Content Management System (CMS). Versions prior to 6.12 allow an authenticated user to exploit Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) by causing the server to make arbitrary GET requests to other servers in the local network or on localhost. The attacker may also truncate arbitrary files to zero size (effectively delete them) leading to denial of service (DoS) or altering application logic. The authenticated user may unknowingly perform the actions by visiting a specially crafted site. Patched in C1 CMS v6.12, no known workarounds exist. |
| CVE-2022-24739 | alltube is an html front end for youtube-dl. On releases prior to 3.0.3, an attacker could craft a special HTML page to trigger either an open redirect attack or a Server-Side Request Forgery attack (depending on how AllTube is configured). The impact is mitigated by the fact the SSRF attack is only possible when the `stream` option is enabled in the configuration. (This option is disabled by default.) 3.0.3 contains a fix for this vulnerability. |
| CVE-2022-24568 | Novel-plus v3.6.0 was discovered to be vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via user-supplied crafted input. |
| CVE-2022-24449 | Solar appScreener through 3.10.4, when a valid license is not present, allows XXE and SSRF attacks via a crafted XML document. |
| CVE-2022-24406 | OX App Suite through 7.10.6 allows SSRF because multipart/form-data boundaries are predictable, and this can lead to injection into internal Documentconverter API calls. |
| CVE-2022-24333 | In JetBrains TeamCity before 2021.2, blind SSRF via an XML-RPC call was possible. |
| CVE-2022-24129 | The OIDC OP plugin before 3.0.4 for Shibboleth Identity Provider allows server-side request forgery (SSRF) due to insufficient restriction of the request_uri parameter. This allows attackers to interact with arbitrary third-party HTTP services. |
| CVE-2022-23734 | A deserialization of untrusted data vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that could potentially lead to remote code execution on the SVNBridge. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would need to gain access via a server-side request forgery (SSRF) that would let an attacker control the data being deserialized. This vulnerability affected all versions of GitHub Enterprise Server prior to v3.6 and was fixed in versions 3.5.3, 3.4.6, 3.3.11, and 3.2.16. This vulnerability was reported via the GitHub Bug Bounty program. |
| CVE-2022-23668 | A remote authenticated server-side request forgery (ssrf) vulnerability was discovered in Aruba ClearPass Policy Manager version(s): 6.10.4 and below, 6.9.9 and below, 6.8.9-HF2 and below, 6.7.x and below. Aruba has released updates to ClearPass Policy Manage that address this security vulnerability. |
| CVE-2022-2352 | The Post SMTP Mailer/Email Log WordPress plugin before 2.1.7 does not have proper authorisation in some AJAX actions, which could allow high privilege users such as admin to perform blind SSRF on multisite installations for example. |
| CVE-2022-23464 | Nepxion Discovery is a solution for Spring Cloud. Discovery is vulnerable to a potential Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). RouterResourceImpl uses RestTemplate’s getForEntity to retrieve the contents of a URL containing user-controlled input, potentially resulting in Information Disclosure. There is no patch available for this issue at time of publication. There are no known workarounds. |
| CVE-2022-2339 | With this SSRF vulnerability, an attacker can reach internal addresses to make a request as the server and read it's contents. This attack can lead to leak of sensitive information. |
| CVE-2022-23170 | SysAid - Okta SSO integration - was found vulnerable to XML External Entity Injection vulnerability. Any SysAid environment that uses the Okta SSO integration might be vulnerable. An unauthenticated attacker could exploit the XXE vulnerability by sending a malformed POST request to the identity provider endpoint. An attacker can extract the identity provider endpoint by decoding the SAMLRequest parameter's value and searching for the AssertionConsumerServiceURL parameter's value. It often allows an attacker to view files on the application server filesystem and interact with any back-end or external systems that the application can access. In some situations, an attacker can escalate an XXE attack to compromise the underlying server or other back-end infrastructure by leveraging the XXE vulnerability to perform server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks. |
| CVE-2022-23080 | In directus versions v9.0.0-beta.2 through 9.6.0 are vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF) in the media upload functionality which allows a low privileged user to perform internal network port scans. |
| CVE-2022-23071 | In Recipes, versions 0.9.1 through 1.2.5 are vulnerable to Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF), in the “Import Recipe” functionality. When an attacker enters the localhost URL, a low privileged attacker can access/read the internal file system to access sensitive information. |
| CVE-2022-22993 | A limited SSRF vulnerability was discovered on Western Digital My Cloud devices that could allow an attacker to impersonate a server and reach any page on the server by bypassing access controls. The vulnerability was addressed by creating a whitelist for valid parameters. |
| CVE-2022-22982 | The vCenter Server contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. A malicious actor with network access to 443 on the vCenter Server may exploit this issue by accessing a URL request outside of vCenter Server or accessing an internal service. |
| CVE-2022-22702 | PartKeepr versions up to v1.4.0, in the functionality to upload attachments using a URL when creating a part does not validate that requests can be made to local ports, allowing an authenticated user to carry out SSRF attacks and port enumeration. |
| CVE-2022-22416 | IBM Sterling Partner Engagement Manager 6.1.2, 6.2, and Cloud/SasS 22.2 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 223126. |
| CVE-2022-22339 | IBM Planning Analytics 2.0 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 219736. |
| CVE-2022-2216 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitHub repository ionicabizau/parse-url prior to 7.0.0. |
| CVE-2022-21697 | Jupyter Server Proxy is a Jupyter notebook server extension to proxy web services. Versions of Jupyter Server Proxy prior to 3.2.1 are vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). Any user deploying Jupyter Server or Notebook with jupyter-proxy-server extension enabled is affected. A lack of input validation allows authenticated clients to proxy requests to other hosts, bypassing the `allowed_hosts` check. Because authentication is required, which already grants permissions to make the same requests via kernel or terminal execution, this is considered low to moderate severity. Users may upgrade to version 3.2.1 to receive a patch or, as a workaround, install the patch manually. |
| CVE-2022-20958 | A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco BroadWorks CommPilot application could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to perform a server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to the web interface. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to obtain confidential information from the BroadWorks server and other device on the network. {{value}} ["%7b%7bvalue%7d%7d"])}]] |
| CVE-2022-20951 | A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco BroadWorks CommPilot application could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to perform a server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to the web interface. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to obtain confidential information from the BroadWorks server and other device on the network. {{value}} ["%7b%7bvalue%7d%7d"])}]] |
| CVE-2022-1977 | The Import Export All WordPress Images, Users & Post Types WordPress plugin before 6.5.3 does not fully validate the file to be imported via an URL before making an HTTP request to it, which could allow high privilege users such as admin to perform Blind SSRF attacks |
| CVE-2022-1784 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitHub repository jgraph/drawio prior to 18.0.8. |
| CVE-2022-1767 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitHub repository jgraph/drawio prior to 18.0.7. |
| CVE-2022-1723 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitHub repository jgraph/drawio prior to 18.0.6. |
| CVE-2022-1722 | SSRF in editor's proxy via IPv6 link-local address in GitHub repository jgraph/drawio prior to 18.0.5. SSRF to internal link-local IPv6 addresses |
| CVE-2022-1713 | SSRF on /proxy in GitHub repository jgraph/drawio prior to 18.0.4. An attacker can make a request as the server and read its contents. This can lead to a leak of sensitive information. |
| CVE-2022-1711 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitHub repository jgraph/drawio prior to 18.0.5. |
| CVE-2022-1398 | The External Media without Import WordPress plugin through 1.1.2 does not have any authorisation and does to ensure that medias added via URLs are external medias, which could allow any authenticated users, such as subscriber to perform blind SSRF attacks |
| CVE-2022-1379 | URL Restriction Bypass in GitHub repository plantuml/plantuml prior to V1.2022.5. An attacker can abuse this to bypass URL restrictions that are imposed by the different security profiles and achieve server side request forgery (SSRF). This allows accessing restricted internal resources/servers or sending requests to third party servers. |
| CVE-2022-1285 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitHub repository gogs/gogs prior to 0.12.8. |
| CVE-2022-1239 | The HubSpot WordPress plugin before 8.8.15 does not validate the proxy URL given to the proxy REST endpoint, which could allow users with the edit_posts capability (by default contributor and above) to perform SSRF attacks |
| CVE-2022-1213 | SSRF filter bypass port 80, 433 in GitHub repository livehelperchat/livehelperchat prior to 3.67v. An attacker could make the application perform arbitrary requests, bypass CVE-2022-1191 |
| CVE-2022-1191 | SSRF on index.php/cobrowse/proxycss/ in GitHub repository livehelperchat/livehelperchat prior to 3.96. |
| CVE-2022-1188 | An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions starting from 12.1 before 14.7.7, all versions starting from 14.8 before 14.8.5, all versions starting from 14.9 before 14.9.2 where a blind SSRF attack through the repository mirroring feature was possible. |
| CVE-2022-1037 | The EXMAGE WordPress plugin before 1.0.7 does to ensure that images added via URLs are external images, which could lead to a blind SSRF issue by using local URLs |
| CVE-2022-0990 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitHub repository janeczku/calibre-web prior to 0.6.18. |
| CVE-2022-0939 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitHub repository janeczku/calibre-web prior to 0.6.18. |
| CVE-2022-0870 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitHub repository gogs/gogs prior to 0.12.5. |
| CVE-2022-0768 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitHub repository rudloff/alltube prior to 3.0.2. |
| CVE-2022-0767 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitHub repository janeczku/calibre-web prior to 0.6.17. |
| CVE-2022-0766 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitHub repository janeczku/calibre-web prior to 0.6.17. |
| CVE-2022-0671 | A flaw was found in vscode-xml in versions prior to 0.19.0. Schema download could lead to blind SSRF or DoS via a large file. |
| CVE-2022-0591 | The FormCraft WordPress plugin before 3.8.28 does not validate the URL parameter in the formcraft3_get AJAX action, leading to SSRF issues exploitable by unauthenticated users |
| CVE-2022-0528 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitHub repository transloadit/uppy prior to 3.3.1. |
| CVE-2022-0508 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitHub repository chocobozzz/peertube prior to f33e515991a32885622b217bf2ed1d1b0d9d6832 |
| CVE-2022-0425 | A DNS rebinding vulnerability in the Irker IRC Gateway integration in all versions of GitLab CE/EE since version 7.9 allows an attacker to trigger Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attacks. |
| CVE-2022-0339 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Pypi calibreweb prior to 0.6.16. |
| CVE-2022-0249 | A vulnerability was discovered in GitLab starting with version 12. GitLab was vulnerable to a blind SSRF attack since requests to shared address space were not blocked. |
| CVE-2022-0136 | A vulnerability was discovered in GitLab versions 10.5 to 14.5.4, 14.6 to 14.6.4, and 14.7 to 14.7.1. GitLab was vulnerable to a blind SSRF attack through the Project Import feature. |
| CVE-2022-0132 | peertube is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) |
| CVE-2022-0086 | uppy is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) |
| CVE-2022-0085 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitHub repository dompdf/dompdf prior to 2.0.0. |
| CVE-2021-46107 | Ligeo Archives Ligeo Basics as of 02_01-2022 is vulnerable to Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) which allows an attacker to read any documents via the download features. |
| CVE-2021-45968 | An issue was discovered in xmppserver jar in the XMPP Server component of the JIve platform, as used in Pascom Cloud Phone System before 7.20.x (and in other products). An endpoint in the backend Tomcat server of the Pascom allows SSRF, a related issue to CVE-2019-18394. |
| CVE-2021-45917 | The server-request receiver function of Shockwall system has an improper authentication vulnerability. An authenticated attacker of an agent computer within the local area network can use the local registry information to launch server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack on another agent computer, resulting in arbitrary code execution for controlling the system or disrupting service. |
| CVE-2021-45851 | A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attack in FUXA 1.1.3 can be carried out leading to the obtaining of sensitive information from the server's internal environment and services, often potentially leading to the attacker executing commands on the server. |
| CVE-2021-45325 | Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulneraility exists in Gitea before 1.7.0 using the OpenID URL. |
| CVE-2021-44659 | ** DISPUTED ** Adding a new pipeline in GoCD server version 21.3.0 has a functionality that could be abused to do an un-intended action in order to achieve a Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF). NOTE: the vendor's position is that the observed behavior is not a vulnerability, because the product's design allows an admin to configure outbound requests. |
| CVE-2021-44224 | A crafted URI sent to httpd configured as a forward proxy (ProxyRequests on) can cause a crash (NULL pointer dereference) or, for configurations mixing forward and reverse proxy declarations, can allow for requests to be directed to a declared Unix Domain Socket endpoint (Server Side Request Forgery). This issue affects Apache HTTP Server 2.4.7 up to 2.4.51 (included). |
| CVE-2021-44139 | Sentinel 1.8.2 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF). |
| CVE-2021-43959 | Affected versions of Atlassian Jira Service Management Server and Data Center allow authenticated remote attackers to access the content of internal network resources via a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the CSV importing feature of JSM Insight. When running in an environment like Amazon EC2, this flaw may be used to access to a metadata resource that provides access credentials and other potentially confidential information. The affected versions are before version 4.13.20, from version 4.14.0 before 4.20.8, and from version 4.21.0 before 4.22.2. |
| CVE-2021-43954 | The DefaultRepositoryAdminService class in Fisheye and Crucible before version 4.8.9 allowed remote attackers, who have 'can add repository permission', to enumerate the existence of internal network and filesystem resources via a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. |
| CVE-2021-43780 | Redash is a package for data visualization and sharing. In versions 10.0 and priorm the implementation of URL-loading data sources like JSON, CSV, or Excel is vulnerable to advanced methods of Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF). These vulnerabilities are only exploitable on installations where a URL-loading data source is enabled. As of time of publication, the `master` and `release/10.x.x` branches address this by applying the Advocate library for making http requests instead of the requests library directly. Users should upgrade to version 10.0.1 to receive this patch. There are a few workarounds for mitigating the vulnerability without upgrading. One can disable the vulnerable data sources entirely, by adding the following env variable to one's configuration, making them unavailable inside the webapp. One can switch any data source of certain types (viewable in the GitHub Security Advisory) to be `View Only` for all groups on the Settings > Groups > Data Sources screen. For users unable to update an admin may modify Redash's configuration through environment variables to mitigate this issue. Depending on the version of Redash, an admin may also need to run a CLI command to re-encrypt some fields in the database. The `master` and `release/10.x.x` branches as of time of publication have removed the default value for `REDASH_COOKIE_SECRET`. All future releases will also require this to be set explicitly. For existing installations, one will need to ensure that explicit values are set for the `REDASH_COOKIE_SECRET` and `REDASH_SECRET_KEY `variables. |
| CVE-2021-43562 | An issue was discovered in the pixxio (aka pixx.io integration or DAM) extension before 1.0.6 for TYPO3. The extension fails to restrict the image download to the configured pixx.io DAM URL, resulting in SSRF. As a result, an attacker can download various content from a remote location and save it to a user-controlled filename, which may result in Remote Code Execution. A TYPO3 backend user account is required to exploit this. |
| CVE-2021-43449 | ONLYOFFICE all versions as of 2021-11-08 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). The document editor service can be abused to read and serve arbitrary URLs as a document. |
| CVE-2021-43296 | Zoho ManageEngine SupportCenter Plus before 11016 is vulnerable to an SSRF attack in ActionExecutor. |
| CVE-2021-43293 | Sonatype Nexus Repository Manager 3.x before 3.36.0 allows a remote authenticated attacker to potentially perform network enumeration via Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF). |
| CVE-2021-42637 | PrinterLogic Web Stack versions 19.1.1.13 SP9 and below use user-controlled input to craft a URL, resulting in a Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. |
| CVE-2021-42091 | An issue was discovered in Zammad before 4.1.1. SSRF can occur via GitHub or GitLab integration. |
| CVE-2021-42079 | An authenticated administrator is able to prepare an alert that is able to execute an SSRF attack. This is exclusively with POST requests. |
| CVE-2021-41809 | SSRF vulnerability in M-Files Server products with versions before 22.1.11017.1, in a preview function allowed making queries from the server with certain document types referencing external entities. |
| CVE-2021-41792 | An issue was discovered in Hyland org.alfresco:alfresco-content-services through 6.2.2.18 and org.alfresco:alfresco-transform-services through 1.3. A crafted HTML file, once uploaded, could trigger an unexpected request by the transformation engine. The response to the request is not available to the attacker, i.e., this is blind SSRF. |
| CVE-2021-41587 | In Gradle Enterprise before 2021.1.3, an attacker with the ability to perform SSRF attacks can potentially discover credentials for other resources. |
| CVE-2021-41586 | In Gradle Enterprise before 2021.1.3, an attacker with the ability to perform SSRF attacks can potentially reset the system user password. |
| CVE-2021-41385 | The third party intelligence connector in Securonix SNYPR 6.3.1 Build 184295_0302 allows an authenticated user to obtain access to server configuration details via SSRF. |
| CVE-2021-40822 | GeoServer through 2.18.5 and 2.19.x through 2.19.2 allows SSRF via the option for setting a proxy host. |
| CVE-2021-4075 | snipe-it is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) |
| CVE-2021-40604 | A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in IPS Community Suite before 4.6.2 allows remote authenticated users to request arbitrary URLs or trigger deserialization via phar protocol when generating class names dynamically. In some cases an exploitation is possible by an unauthenticated user. |
| CVE-2021-40537 | Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in owncloud/user_ldap < 0.15.4 in the settings of the user_ldap app. Administration role is necessary for exploitation. |
| CVE-2021-40186 | The AppCheck research team identified a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the DNN CMS platform, formerly known as DotNetNuke. SSRF vulnerabilities allow the attacker to exploit the target system to make network requests on their behalf, allowing a range of possible attacks. In the most common scenario, the attacker exploits SSRF vulnerabilities to attack systems behind the firewall and access sensitive information from Cloud Provider metadata services. |
| CVE-2021-40109 | A SSRF issue was discovered in Concrete CMS through 8.5.5. Users can access forbidden files on their local network. A user with permissions to upload files from external sites can upload a URL that redirects to an internal resource of any file type. The redirect is followed and loads the contents of the file from the redirected-to server. Files of disallowed types can be uploaded. |
| CVE-2021-40103 | An issue was discovered in Concrete CMS through 8.5.5. Path Traversal can lead to Arbitrary File Reading and SSRF. |
| CVE-2021-40091 | An SSRF issue was discovered in SquaredUp for SCOM 5.2.1.6654. |
| CVE-2021-39867 | In all versions of GitLab CE/EE since version 8.15, a DNS rebinding vulnerability in Gitea Importer may be exploited by an attacker to trigger Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attacks. |
| CVE-2021-3959 | A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the EPPUpdateService component of Bitdefender Endpoint Security Tools allows an attacker to proxy requests to the relay server. This issue affects: Bitdefender Bitdefender GravityZone versions prior to 3.3.8.272 |
| CVE-2021-39497 | eyoucms 1.5.4 lacks sanitization of input data, allowing an attacker to inject a url to trigger blind SSRF via the saveRemote() function. |
| CVE-2021-39303 | The server in Jamf Pro before 10.32.0 has an SSRF vulnerability, aka PI-006352. NOTE: Jamf Nation will also publish an article about this vulnerability. |
| CVE-2021-39057 | IBM Spectrum Protect Plus 10.1.0.0 through 10.1.8.x is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 214616. |
| CVE-2021-3902 | An improper restriction of external entities (XXE) vulnerability in dompdf/dompdf's SVG parser allows for Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) and deserialization attacks. This issue affects all versions prior to 2.0.0. The vulnerability can be exploited even if the isRemoteEnabled option is set to false. It allows attackers to perform SSRF, disclose internal image files, and cause PHAR deserialization attacks. |
| CVE-2021-3758 | bookstack is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) |
| CVE-2021-37498 | An SSRF issue was discovered in Reprise License Manager (RLM) web interface through 14.2BL4 that allows remote attackers to trigger outbound requests to intranet servers, conduct port scans via the actserver parameter in License Activation function. |
| CVE-2021-3742 | A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was discovered in chatwoot/chatwoot, affecting all versions prior to 2.5.0. The vulnerability allows an attacker to upload an SVG file containing a malicious SSRF payload. When the SVG file is used as an avatar and opened in a new tab, it can trigger the SSRF, potentially leading to host redirection. |
| CVE-2021-37419 | Zoho ManageEngine ADSelfService Plus before 6112 is vulnerable to SSRF. |
| CVE-2021-37353 | Nagios XI Docker Wizard before version 1.1.3 is vulnerable to SSRF due to improper sanitation in table_population.php. |
| CVE-2021-37223 | Nagios Enterprises NagiosXI <= 5.8.4 contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in schedulereport.php. Any authenticated user can create scheduled reports containing PDF screenshots of any view in the NagiosXI application. Due to lack of input sanitisation, the target page can be replaced with an SSRF payload to access internal resources or disclose local system files. |
| CVE-2021-36761 | The GeoAnalytics feature in Qlik Sense April 2020 patch 4 allows SSRF. |
| CVE-2021-36396 | In Moodle, insufficient redirect handling made it possible to blindly bypass cURL blocked hosts/allowed ports restrictions, resulting in a blind SSRF risk. |
| CVE-2021-36202 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Johnson Controls Metasys could allow an authenticated attacker to inject malicious code into the MUI PDF export feature. This issue affects: Johnson Controls Metasys All 10 versions versions prior to 10.1.5; All 11 versions versions prior to 11.0.2. |
| CVE-2021-36043 | Magento Commerce versions 2.4.2 (and earlier), 2.4.2-p1 (and earlier) and 2.3.7 (and earlier) are affected by a blind SSRF vulnerability in the bundled dotmailer extension. An attacker with admin privileges could abuse this to achieve remote code execution should Redis be enabled. |
| CVE-2021-3553 | A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the EPPUpdateService of Bitdefender Endpoint Security Tools allows an attacker to use the Endpoint Protection relay as a proxy for any remote host. This issue affects: Bitdefender Endpoint Security Tools versions prior to 6.6.27.390; versions prior to 7.1.2.33. Bitdefender Unified Endpoint for Linux versions prior to 6.2.21.160. Bitdefender GravityZone versions prior to 6.24.1-1. |
| CVE-2021-3552 | A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the EPPUpdateService component of Bitdefender Endpoint Security Tools allows an attacker to proxy requests to the relay server. This issue affects: Bitdefender Endpoint Security Tools versions prior to 6.6.27.390; versions prior to 7.1.2.33. Bitdefender GravityZone 6.24.1-1. |
| CVE-2021-35512 | An SSRF issue was discovered in Zoho ManageEngine Applications Manager build 15200. |
| CVE-2021-34811 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in task management component in Synology Download Station before 3.8.16-3566 allows remote authenticated users to access intranet resources via unspecified vectors. |
| CVE-2021-34808 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in cgi component in Synology Media Server before 1.8.3-2881 allows remote attackers to access intranet resources via unspecified vectors. |
| CVE-2021-34706 | A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to access sensitive information or conduct a server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack through an affected device. This vulnerability is due to improper handling of XML External Entity (XXE) entries when parsing certain XML files. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by uploading a crafted XML file that contains references to external entities. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to retrieve files from the local system, resulting in the disclosure of sensitive information, or cause the web application to perform arbitrary HTTP requests on behalf of the attacker. |
| CVE-2021-33705 | The SAP NetWeaver Portal, versions - 7.10, 7.11, 7.20, 7.30, 7.31, 7.40, 7.50, component Iviews Editor contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability which allows an unauthenticated attacker to craft a malicious URL which when clicked by a user can make any type of request (e.g. POST, GET) to any internal or external server. This can result in the accessing or modification of data accessible from the Portal but will not affect its availability. |
| CVE-2021-33690 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability has been detected in the SAP NetWeaver Development Infrastructure Component Build Service versions - 7.11, 7.20, 7.30, 7.31, 7.40, 7.50The SAP NetWeaver Development Infrastructure Component Build Service allows a threat actor who has access to the server to perform proxy attacks on server by sending crafted queries. Due to this, the threat actor could completely compromise sensitive data residing on the Server and impact its availability.Note: The impact of this vulnerability depends on whether SAP NetWeaver Development Infrastructure (NWDI) runs on the intranet or internet. The CVSS score reflects the impact considering the worst-case scenario that it runs on the internet. |
| CVE-2021-33581 | MashZone NextGen through 10.7 GA has an SSRF vulnerability that allows an attacker to interact with arbitrary TCP services, by abusing the feature to check the availability of a PPM connection. This occurs in com.idsscheer.ppmmashup.web.webservice.impl.ZPrestoAdminWebService. |
| CVE-2021-33511 | Plone though 5.2.4 allows SSRF via the lxml parser. This affects Diazo themes, Dexterity TTW schemas, and modeleditors in plone.app.theming, plone.app.dexterity, and plone.supermodel. |
| CVE-2021-33510 | Plone through 5.2.4 allows remote authenticated managers to conduct SSRF attacks via an event ical URL, to read one line of a file. |
| CVE-2021-33213 | An SSRF vulnerability in the "Upload from URL" feature in Elements-IT HTTP Commander 5.3.3 allows remote authenticated users to retrieve HTTP and FTP files from the internal server network by inserting an internal address. |
| CVE-2021-33184 | Server-Side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in task management component in Synology Download Station before 3.8.15-3563 allows remote authenticated users to read arbitrary files via unspecified vectors. |
| CVE-2021-33181 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in webapi component in Synology Video Station before 2.4.10-1632 allows remote authenticated users to send arbitrary request to intranet resources via unspecified vectors. |
| CVE-2021-32663 | iTop is an open source web based IT Service Management tool. In affected versions an attacker can call the system setup without authentication. Given specific parameters this can lead to SSRF. This issue has been resolved in versions 2.6.5 and 2.7.5 and later |
| CVE-2021-32639 | Emissary is a P2P-based, data-driven workflow engine. Emissary version 6.4.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). In particular, the `RegisterPeerAction` endpoint and the `AddChildDirectoryAction` endpoint are vulnerable to SSRF. This vulnerability may lead to credential leaks. Emissary version 7.0 contains a patch. As a workaround, disable network access to Emissary from untrusted sources. |
| CVE-2021-32603 | A server-side request forgery (SSRF) (CWE-918) vulnerability in FortiManager and FortiAnalyser GUI 7.0.0, 6.4.5 and below, 6.2.7 and below, 6.0.11 and below, 5.6.11 and below may allow a remote and authenticated attacker to access unauthorized files and services on the system via specifically crafted web requests. |
| CVE-2021-3204 | SSRF in the document conversion component of Webware Webdesktop 5.1.15 allows an attacker to read all files from the server. |
| CVE-2021-31910 | In JetBrains TeamCity before 2020.2.3, information disclosure via SSRF was possible. |
| CVE-2021-31828 | An SSRF issue in Open Distro for Elasticsearch (ODFE) before 1.13.1.0 allows an existing privileged user to enumerate listening services or interact with configured resources via HTTP requests exceeding the Alerting plugin's intended scope. |
| CVE-2021-31779 | The yoast_seo (aka Yoast SEO) extension before 7.2.1 for TYPO3 allows SSRF via a backend user account. |
| CVE-2021-31531 | Zoho ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus MSP before 10521 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). |
| CVE-2021-31216 | Siren Investigate before 11.1.1 contains a server side request forgery (SSRF) defect in the built-in image proxy route (which is enabled by default). An attacker with access to the Investigate installation can specify an arbitrary URL in the parameters of the image proxy route and fetch external URLs as the Investigate process on the host. |
| CVE-2021-30137 | Assyst 10 SP7.5 has authenticated XXE leading to SSRF via XML unmarshalling. The application allows users to send JSON or XML data to the server. It was possible to inject malicious XML data through several access points. |
| CVE-2021-30108 | Feehi CMS 2.1.1 is affected by a Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. When the user modifies the HTTP Referer header to any url, the server can make a request to it. |
| CVE-2021-29863 | IBM QRadar SIEM 7.3 and 7.4 is vulnerable to server side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. This vulnerability is due to an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-4786. IBM X-Force ID: 206087. |
| CVE-2021-29844 | IBM Jazz Team Server products is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. |
| CVE-2021-29749 | IBM Secure External Authentication Server 6.0.2 and IBM Secure Proxy 6.0.2 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 201777. |
| CVE-2021-29738 | IBM InfoSphere Data Flow Designer (IBM InfoSphere Information Server 11.7 ) is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 201302. |
| CVE-2021-29490 | Jellyfin is a free software media system that provides media from a dedicated server to end-user devices via multiple apps. Verions prior to 10.7.3 vulnerable to unauthenticated Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attacks via the imageUrl parameter. This issue potentially exposes both internal and external HTTP servers or other resources available via HTTP `GET` that are visible from the Jellyfin server. The vulnerability is patched in version 10.7.3. As a workaround, disable external access to the API endpoints `/Items/*/RemoteImages/Download`, `/Items/RemoteSearch/Image` and `/Images/Remote` via reverse proxy, or limit to known-friendly IPs. |
| CVE-2021-29357 | The ECT Provider component in OutSystems Platform Server 10 before 10.0.1104.0 and 11 before 11.9.0 (and LifeTime management console before 11.7.0) allows SSRF for arbitrary outbound HTTP requests. |
| CVE-2021-29145 | A remote server side request forgery (SSRF) remote code execution vulnerability was discovered in Aruba ClearPass Policy Manager version(s) prior to 6.9.5, 6.8.9, 6.7.14-HF1. Aruba has released patches for Aruba ClearPass Policy Manager that address this security vulnerability. |
| CVE-2021-29102 | A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in ArcGIS Server Manager version 10.8.1 and below may allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to forge GET requests to arbitrary URLs from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. |
| CVE-2021-28918 | Improper input validation of octal strings in netmask npm package v1.0.6 and below allows unauthenticated remote attackers to perform indeterminate SSRF, RFI, and LFI attacks on many of the dependent packages. A remote unauthenticated attacker can bypass packages relying on netmask to filter IPs and reach critical VPN or LAN hosts. |
| CVE-2021-28910 | BAB TECHNOLOGIE GmbH eibPort V3 prior version 3.9.1 contains basic SSRF vulnerability. It allow unauthenticated attackers to request to any internal and external server. |
| CVE-2021-28060 | A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Group Office 6.4.196 allows a remote attacker to forge GET requests to arbitrary URLs via the url parameter to group/api/upload.php. |
| CVE-2021-27905 | The ReplicationHandler (normally registered at "/replication" under a Solr core) in Apache Solr has a "masterUrl" (also "leaderUrl" alias) parameter that is used to designate another ReplicationHandler on another Solr core to replicate index data into the local core. To prevent a SSRF vulnerability, Solr ought to check these parameters against a similar configuration it uses for the "shards" parameter. Prior to this bug getting fixed, it did not. This problem affects essentially all Solr versions prior to it getting fixed in 8.8.2. |
| CVE-2021-27738 | All request mappings in `StreamingCoordinatorController.java` handling `/kylin/api/streaming_coordinator/*` REST API endpoints did not include any security checks, which allowed an unauthenticated user to issue arbitrary requests, such as assigning/unassigning of streaming cubes, creation/modification and deletion of replica sets, to the Kylin Coordinator. For endpoints accepting node details in HTTP message body, unauthenticated (but limited) server-side request forgery (SSRF) can be achieved. This issue affects Apache Kylin Apache Kylin 3 versions prior to 3.1.2. |
| CVE-2021-27693 | Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in PublicCMS before 4.0.202011.b via /publiccms/admin/ueditor when the action is catchimage. |
| CVE-2021-27670 | Appspace 6.2.4 allows SSRF via the api/v1/core/proxy/jsonprequest url parameter. |
| CVE-2021-27329 | Friendica 2021.01 allows SSRF via parse_url?binurl= for DNS lookups or HTTP requests to arbitrary domain names. |
| CVE-2021-27312 | Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Gleez Cms 1.2.0, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code and obtain sensitive information via modules/gleez/classes/request.php. |
| CVE-2021-27214 | A Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the ProductConfig servlet in Zoho ManageEngine ADSelfService Plus through 6013 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to perform blind HTTP requests or perform a Cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against the administrative interface via an HTTP request, a different vulnerability than CVE-2019-3905. |
| CVE-2021-27103 | Accellion FTA 9_12_411 and earlier is affected by SSRF via a crafted POST request to wmProgressstat.html. The fixed version is FTA_9_12_416 and later. |
| CVE-2021-26715 | The OpenID Connect server implementation for MITREid Connect through 1.3.3 contains a Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. The vulnerability arises due to unsafe usage of the logo_uri parameter in the Dynamic Client Registration request. An unauthenticated attacker can make a HTTP request from the vulnerable server to any address in the internal network and obtain its response (which might, for example, have a JavaScript payload for resultant XSS). The issue can be exploited to bypass network boundaries, obtain sensitive data, or attack other hosts in the internal network. |
| CVE-2021-26699 | OX App Suite before 7.10.3-rev4 and 7.10.4 before 7.10.4-rev4 allows SSRF via a shared SVG document that is mishandled by the imageconverter component when the .png extension is used. |
| CVE-2021-26072 | The WidgetConnector plugin in Confluence Server and Confluence Data Center before version 5.8.6 allowed remote attackers to manipulate the content of internal network resources via a blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. |
| CVE-2021-25972 | In Camaleon CMS, versions 2.1.2.0 to 2.6.0, are vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the media upload feature, which allows admin users to fetch media files from external URLs but fails to validate URLs referencing to localhost or other internal servers. This allows attackers to read files stored in the internal server. |
| CVE-2021-25939 | In ArangoDB, versions v3.7.0 through v3.9.0-alpha.1 have a feature which allows downloading a Foxx service from a publicly available URL. This feature does not enforce proper filtering of requests performed internally, which can be abused by a highly-privileged attacker to perform blind SSRF and send internal requests to localhost. |
| CVE-2021-25640 | In Apache Dubbo prior to 2.6.9 and 2.7.9, the usage of parseURL method will lead to the bypass of white host check which can cause open redirect or SSRF vulnerability. |
| CVE-2021-25241 | A server-side request forgery (SSRF) information disclosure vulnerability in Trend Micro Apex One and Worry-Free Business Security 10.0 SP1 could allow an unauthenticated user to locate online agents via a sweep. |
| CVE-2021-25236 | A server-side request forgery (SSRF) information disclosure vulnerability in Trend Micro OfficeScan XG SP1 and Worry-Free Business Security 10.0 SP1 could allow an unauthenticated user to locate online agents via a specific sweep. |
| CVE-2021-24472 | The OnAir2 WordPress theme before 3.9.9.2 and QT KenthaRadio WordPress plugin before 2.0.2 have exposed proxy functionality to unauthenticated users, sending requests to this proxy functionality will have the web server fetch and display the content from any URI, this would allow for SSRF (Server Side Request Forgery) and RFI (Remote File Inclusion) vulnerabilities on the website. |
| CVE-2021-24371 | The Import feature of the RSVPMaker WordPress plugin before 8.7.3 (/wp-admin/tools.php?page=rsvpmaker_export_screen) takes an URL input and calls curl on it, without first validating it to ensure it's a remote one. As a result, a high privilege user could use that feature to scan the internal network via a SSRF attack. |
| CVE-2021-24150 | The LikeBtn WordPress Like Button Rating ♥ LikeBtn WordPress plugin before 2.6.32 was vulnerable to Unauthenticated Full-Read Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). |
| CVE-2021-23927 | OX App Suite through 7.10.4 allows SSRF via a URL with an @ character in an appsuite/api/oauth/proxy PUT request. |
| CVE-2021-23718 | The package ssrf-agent before 1.0.5 are vulnerable to Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the defaultIpChecker function. It fails to properly validate if the IP requested is private. |
| CVE-2021-23664 | The package @isomorphic-git/cors-proxy before 2.7.1 are vulnerable to Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF) due to missing sanitization and validation of the redirection action in middleware.js. |
| CVE-2021-23345 | All versions of package github.com/thecodingmachine/gotenberg are vulnerable to Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the /convert/html endpoint when the src attribute of an HTML element refers to an internal system file, such as <iframe src='file:///etc/passwd'>. |
| CVE-2021-23029 | On version 16.0.x before 16.0.1.2, insufficient permission checks may allow authenticated users with guest privileges to perform Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attacks through F5 Advanced Web Application Firewall (WAF) and the BIG-IP ASM Configuration utility. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2021-22970 | Concrete CMS (formerly concrete5) versions 8.5.6 and below and version 9.0.0 allow local IP importing causing the system to be vulnerable toa. SSRF attacks on the private LAN servers by reading files from the local LAN. An attacker can pivot in the private LAN and exploit local network appsandb. SSRF Mitigation Bypass through DNS RebindingConcrete CMS security team gave this a CVSS score of 3.5 AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:NConcrete CMS is maintaining Concrete version 8.5.x until 1 May 2022 for security fixes.This CVE is shared with HackerOne Reports https://hackerone.com/reports/1364797 and https://hackerone.com/reports/1360016Reporters: Adrian Tiron from FORTBRIDGE (https://www.fortbridge.co.uk/ ) and Bipul Jaiswal |
| CVE-2021-22969 | Concrete CMS (formerly concrete5) versions below 8.5.7 has a SSRF mitigation bypass using DNS Rebind attack giving an attacker the ability to fetch cloud IAAS (ex AWS) IAM keys.To fix this Concrete CMS no longer allows downloads from the local network and specifies the validated IP when downloading rather than relying on DNS.Discoverer: Adrian Tiron from FORTBRIDGE ( https://www.fortbridge.co.uk/ )The Concrete CMS team gave this a CVSS 3.1 score of 3.5 AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N . Please note that Cloud IAAS provider mis-configurations are not Concrete CMS vulnerabilities. A mitigation for this vulnerability is to make sure that the IMDS configurations are according to a cloud provider's best practices.This fix is also in Concrete version 9.0.0 |
| CVE-2021-22821 | A CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists that could cause the station web server to forward requests to unintended network targets when crafted malicious parameters are submitted to the charging station web server. Affected Products: EVlink City EVC1S22P4 / EVC1S7P4 (All versions prior to R8 V3.4.0.2 ), EVlink Parking EVW2 / EVF2 / EVP2PE (All versions prior to R8 V3.4.0.2), and EVlink Smart Wallbox EVB1A (All versions prior to R8 V3.4.0.2) |
| CVE-2021-22726 | A CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in EVlink City (EVC1S22P4 / EVC1S7P4 all versions prior to R8 V3.4.0.1), EVlink Parking (EVW2 / EVF2 / EV.2 all versions prior to R8 V3.4.0.1), and EVlink Smart Wallbox (EVB1A all versions prior to R8 V3.4.0.1 ) that could allow an attacker to perform unintended actions or access to data when crafted malicious parameters are submitted to the charging station web server. |
| CVE-2021-22255 | SSRF in URL file upload in Baserow <1.1.0 allows remote authenticated users to retrieve files from the internal server network exposed over HTTP by inserting an internal address. |
| CVE-2021-22179 | A vulnerability was discovered in GitLab versions before 12.2. GitLab was vulnerable to a SSRF attack through the Outbound Requests feature. |
| CVE-2021-22056 | VMware Workspace ONE Access 21.08, 20.10.0.1, and 20.10 and Identity Manager 3.3.5, 3.3.4, and 3.3.3 contain an SSRF vulnerability. A malicious actor with network access may be able to make HTTP requests to arbitrary origins and read the full response. |
| CVE-2021-22054 | VMware Workspace ONE UEM console 20.0.8 prior to 20.0.8.37, 20.11.0 prior to 20.11.0.40, 21.2.0 prior to 21.2.0.27, and 21.5.0 prior to 21.5.0.37 contain an SSRF vulnerability. This issue may allow a malicious actor with network access to UEM to send their requests without authentication and to gain access to sensitive information. |
| CVE-2021-22049 | The vSphere Web Client (FLEX/Flash) contains an SSRF (Server Side Request Forgery) vulnerability in the vSAN Web Client (vSAN UI) plug-in. A malicious actor with network access to port 443 on vCenter Server may exploit this issue by accessing a URL request outside of vCenter Server or accessing an internal service. |
| CVE-2021-22033 | Releases prior to VMware vRealize Operations 8.6 contain a Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. |
| CVE-2021-21993 | The vCenter Server contains an SSRF (Server Side Request Forgery) vulnerability due to improper validation of URLs in vCenter Server Content Library. An authorised user with access to content library may exploit this issue by sending a POST request to vCenter Server leading to information disclosure. |
| CVE-2021-21973 | The vSphere Client (HTML5) contains an SSRF (Server Side Request Forgery) vulnerability due to improper validation of URLs in a vCenter Server plugin. A malicious actor with network access to port 443 may exploit this issue by sending a POST request to vCenter Server plugin leading to information disclosure. This affects: VMware vCenter Server (7.x before 7.0 U1c, 6.7 before 6.7 U3l and 6.5 before 6.5 U3n) and VMware Cloud Foundation (4.x before 4.2 and 3.x before 3.10.1.2). |
| CVE-2021-21288 | CarrierWave is an open-source RubyGem which provides a simple and flexible way to upload files from Ruby applications. In CarrierWave before versions 1.3.2 and 2.1.1 the download feature has an SSRF vulnerability, allowing attacks to provide DNS entries or IP addresses that are intended for internal use and gather information about the Intranet infrastructure of the platform. This is fixed in versions 1.3.2 and 2.1.1. |
| CVE-2021-21287 | MinIO is a High Performance Object Storage released under Apache License v2.0. In MinIO before version RELEASE.2021-01-30T00-20-58Z there is a server-side request forgery vulnerability. The target application may have functionality for importing data from a URL, publishing data to a URL, or otherwise reading data from a URL that can be tampered with. The attacker modifies the calls to this functionality by supplying a completely different URL or by manipulating how URLs are built (path traversal etc.). In a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attack, the attacker can abuse functionality on the server to read or update internal resources. The attacker can supply or modify a URL which the code running on the server will read or submit data, and by carefully selecting the URLs, the attacker may be able to read server configuration such as AWS metadata, connect to internal services like HTTP enabled databases, or perform post requests towards internal services which are not intended to be exposed. This is fixed in version RELEASE.2021-01-30T00-20-58Z, all users are advised to upgrade. As a workaround you can disable the browser front-end with "MINIO_BROWSER=off" environment variable. |
| CVE-2021-21009 | Adobe Campaign Classic Gold Standard 10 (and earlier), 20.3.1 (and earlier), 20.2.3 (and earlier), 20.1.3 (and earlier), 19.2.3 (and earlier) and 19.1.7 (and earlier) are affected by a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to use the Campaign instance to issue unauthorized requests to internal or external resources. |
| CVE-2021-20788 | Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in GroupSession (GroupSession Free edition from ver2.2.0 to the version prior to ver5.1.0, GroupSession byCloud from ver3.0.3 to the version prior to ver5.1.0, and GroupSession ZION from ver3.0.3 to the version prior to ver5.1.0) allows a remote authenticated attacker to conduct a port scan from the product and/or obtain information from the internal Web server. |
| CVE-2021-20544 | IBM Jazz Team Server 6.0.6, 6.0.6.1, 7.0, 7.0.1, and 7.0.2 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 198931. |
| CVE-2021-20535 | IBM Jazz Reporting Service 6.0.6.1, 7.0, 7.0.1, and 7.0.2 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 198834. |
| CVE-2021-20483 | IBM Security Identity Manager 6.0.2 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). By sending a specially crafted request, a remote authenticated attacker could exploit this vulnerability to obtain sensitive data. IBM X-Force ID: 197591. |
| CVE-2021-20480 | IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0, 8.0, and 8.5 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). By sending a specially crafted request, a remote authenticated attacker could exploit this vulnerability to obtain sensitive data. IBM X-Force ID: 197502. |
| CVE-2021-20421 | IBM Jazz Team Server 6.0.6, 6.0.6.1, 7.0, 7.0.1, and 7.0.2 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. |
| CVE-2021-20348 | IBM Jazz Foundation and IBM Engineering products are vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. IBM X-ForceID: 194597. |
| CVE-2021-20347 | IBM Jazz Foundation and IBM Engineering products are vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 194596. |
| CVE-2021-20346 | IBM Jazz Foundation and IBM Engineering products are vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 194595. |
| CVE-2021-20345 | IBM Jazz Foundation and IBM Engineering products are vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 194594. |
| CVE-2021-20343 | IBM Jazz Foundation and IBM Engineering products are vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 194593. |
| CVE-2021-20280 | Text-based feedback answers required additional sanitizing to prevent stored XSS and blind SSRF risks in moodle before 3.10.2, 3.9.5, 3.8.8, 3.5.17. |
| CVE-2021-1272 | A vulnerability in the session validation feature of Cisco Data Center Network Manager (DCNM) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass access controls and conduct a server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack on a targeted system. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of parameters in a specific HTTP request by an attacker. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to an authenticated user of the DCNM web application. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass access controls and gain unauthorized access to the Device Manager application, which provides access to network devices managed by the system. |
| CVE-2020-9645 | Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5 and earlier have a blind server-side request forgery (ssrf) vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to sensitive information disclosure. |
| CVE-2020-9643 | Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5 and earlier have a server-side request forgery (ssrf) vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to sensitive information disclosure. |
| CVE-2020-9427 | OX Guard 2.10.3 and earlier allows SSRF. |
| CVE-2020-9298 | The Spinnaker template resolution functionality is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), which allows an attacker to send requests on behalf of Spinnaker potentially leading to sensitive data disclosure. |
| CVE-2020-8902 | Rendertron versions prior to 3.0.0 are are susceptible to a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attack. An attacker can use a specially crafted webpage to force a rendertron headless chrome process to render internal sites it has access to, and display it as a screenshot. Suggested mitigations are to upgrade your rendertron to version 3.0.0, or, if you cannot update, to secure the infrastructure to limit the headless chrome's access to your internal domain. |
| CVE-2020-8830 | CSRF in login.asp on Ruckus devices allows an attacker to access the panel, and use SSRF to perform scraping or other analysis via the SUBCA-1 field on the Wireless Admin screen. |
| CVE-2020-8555 | The Kubernetes kube-controller-manager in versions v1.0-1.14, versions prior to v1.15.12, v1.16.9, v1.17.5, and version v1.18.0 are vulnerable to a Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) that allows certain authorized users to leak up to 500 bytes of arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints within the master's host network (such as link-local or loopback services). |
| CVE-2020-8544 | OX App Suite through 7.10.3 allows SSRF. |
| CVE-2020-8540 | An XML external entity (XXE) vulnerability in Zoho ManageEngine Desktop Central before the 07-Mar-2020 update allows remote unauthenticated users to read arbitrary files or conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via a crafted DTD in an XML request. |
| CVE-2020-8226 | A vulnerability exists in phpBB <v3.2.10 and <v3.3.1 which allowed remote image dimensions check to be used to SSRF. |
| CVE-2020-8205 | The uppy npm package < 1.13.2 and < 2.0.0-alpha.5 is vulnerable to a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability, which allows an attacker to scan local or external networks or otherwise interact with internal systems. |
| CVE-2020-8138 | A missing check for IPv4 nested inside IPv6 in Nextcloud server < 17.0.1, < 16.0.7, and < 15.0.14 allowed a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability when subscribing to a malicious calendar URL. |
| CVE-2020-8135 | The uppy npm package < 1.9.3 is vulnerable to a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability, which allows an attacker to scan local or external network or otherwise interact with internal systems. |
| CVE-2020-8134 | Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Ghost CMS < 3.10.0 allows an attacker to scan local or external network or otherwise interact with internal systems. |
| CVE-2020-7983 | A CSRF issue in login.asp on Ruckus R500 3.4.2.0.384 devices allows remote attackers to access the panel or conduct SSRF attacks. |
| CVE-2020-7796 | Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) before 8.8.15 Patch 7 allows SSRF when WebEx zimlet is installed and zimlet JSP is enabled. |
| CVE-2020-7749 | This affects all versions of package osm-static-maps. User input given to the package is passed directly to a template without escaping ({{{ ... }}}). As such, it is possible for an attacker to inject arbitrary HTML/JS code and depending on the context. It will be outputted as an HTML on the page which gives opportunity for XSS or rendered on the server (puppeteer) which also gives opportunity for SSRF and Local File Read. |
| CVE-2020-7740 | This affects all versions of package node-pdf-generator. Due to lack of user input validation and sanitization done to the content given to node-pdf-generator, it is possible for an attacker to craft a url that will be passed to an external server allowing an SSRF attack. |
| CVE-2020-7739 | This affects all versions of package phantomjs-seo. It is possible for an attacker to craft a url that will be passed to a PhantomJS instance allowing for an SSRF attack. |
| CVE-2020-7126 | A remote server-side request forgery (ssrf) vulnerability was discovered in Aruba Airwave Software version(s): Prior to 1.3.2. |
| CVE-2020-7032 | An XML external entity (XXE) vulnerability in Avaya WebLM admin interface allows authenticated users to read arbitrary files or conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via a crafted DTD in an XML request. Affected versions of Avaya WebLM include: 7.0 through 7.1.3.6 and 8.0 through 8.1.2. |
| CVE-2020-5562 | Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Cybozu Garoon 4.6.0 to 4.6.3 allows a remote attacker with an administrative privilege to issue arbitrary HTTP requests to other web servers via V-CUBE Meeting function. |
| CVE-2020-4974 | IBM Jazz Foundation products are vulnerable to server side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 192434. |
| CVE-2020-4882 | IBM Planning Analytics 2.0 could be vulnerable to a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attack by constucting URLs from user-controlled data . This could enable attackers to make arbitrary requests to the internal network or to the local file system. IBM X-Force ID: 190852. |
| CVE-2020-4787 | IBM QRadar SIEM 7.4.2 GA to 7.4.2 Patch 1, 7.4.0 to 7.4.1 Patch 1, and 7.3.0 to 7.3.3 Patch 5 is vulnerable to server side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 189224. |
| CVE-2020-4786 | IBM QRadar SIEM 7.4.2 GA to 7.4.2 Patch 1, 7.4.0 to 7.4.1 Patch 1, and 7.3.0 to 7.3.3 Patch 5 is vulnerable to server side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 189221. |
| CVE-2020-4529 | IBM Maximo Asset Management 7.6.0 and 7.6.1 is vulnerable to server side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 182713. |
| CVE-2020-4294 | IBM QRadar 7.3.0 to 7.3.3 Patch 2 is vulnerable to Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. IBM X-ForceID: 176404. |
| CVE-2020-3769 | Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5 and earlier have a server-side request forgery (ssrf) vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to sensitive information disclosure. |
| CVE-2020-35970 | An issue was discovered in YzmCMS 5.8. There is a SSRF vulnerability in the background collection management that allows arbitrary file read. |
| CVE-2020-35850 | ** DISPUTED ** An SSRF issue was discovered in cockpit-project.org Cockpit 234. NOTE: this is unrelated to the Agentejo Cockpit product. NOTE: the vendor states "I don't think [it] is a big real-life issue." |
| CVE-2020-35712 | Esri ArcGIS Server before 10.8 is vulnerable to SSRF in some configurations. |
| CVE-2020-35667 | JetBrains TeamCity Plugin before 2020.2.85695 SSRF. Vulnerability that could potentially expose user credentials. |
| CVE-2020-35561 | An issue was discovered MB connect line mymbCONNECT24, mbCONNECT24 and Helmholz myREX24 and myREX24.virtual in all versions through v2.11.2. There is an SSRF in the HA module allowing an unauthenticated attacker to scan for open ports. |
| CVE-2020-35558 | An issue was discovered in MB connect line mymbCONNECT24, mbCONNECT24 and Helmholz myREX24 and myREX24.virtual through 2.11.2. There is an SSRF in the in the MySQL access check, allowing an attacker to scan for open ports and gain some information about possible credentials. |
| CVE-2020-35313 | A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the addCustomThemePluginRepository function in index.php in WonderCMS 3.1.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted URL to the theme/plugin installer. |
| CVE-2020-35205 | ** UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED ** Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Web Compliance Manager in Quest Policy Authority version 8.1.2.200 allows attackers to scan internal ports and make outbound connections via the initFile.jsp file. NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer. |
| CVE-2020-28978 | The Canto plugin 1.3.0 for WordPress contains blind SSRF vulnerability. It allows an unauthenticated attacker can make a request to any internal and external server via /includes/lib/tree.php?subdomain=SSRF. |
| CVE-2020-28977 | The Canto plugin 1.3.0 for WordPress contains blind SSRF vulnerability. It allows an unauthenticated attacker can make a request to any internal and external server via /includes/lib/get.php?subdomain=SSRF. |
| CVE-2020-28976 | The Canto plugin 1.3.0 for WordPress contains a blind SSRF vulnerability. It allows an unauthenticated attacker can make a request to any internal and external server via /includes/lib/detail.php?subdomain=SSRF. |
| CVE-2020-28943 | OX App Suite 7.10.4 and earlier allows SSRF via a snippet. |
| CVE-2020-28735 | Plone before 5.2.3 allows SSRF attacks via the tracebacks feature (only available to the Manager role). |
| CVE-2020-28463 | All versions of package reportlab are vulnerable to Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF) via img tags. In order to reduce risk, use trustedSchemes & trustedHosts (see in Reportlab's documentation) Steps to reproduce by Karan Bamal: 1. Download and install the latest package of reportlab 2. Go to demos -> odyssey -> dodyssey 3. In the text file odyssey.txt that needs to be converted to pdf inject <img src="http://127.0.0.1:5000" valign="top"/> 4. Create a nc listener nc -lp 5000 5. Run python3 dodyssey.py 6. You will get a hit on your nc showing we have successfully proceded to send a server side request 7. dodyssey.py will show error since there is no img file on the url, but we are able to do SSRF |
| CVE-2020-28360 | Insufficient RegEx in private-ip npm package v1.0.5 and below insufficiently filters reserved IP ranges resulting in indeterminate SSRF. An attacker can perform a large range of requests to ARIN reserved IP ranges, resulting in an indeterminable number of critical attack vectors, allowing remote attackers to request server-side resources or potentially execute arbitrary code through various SSRF techniques. |
| CVE-2020-28168 | Axios NPM package 0.21.0 contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability where an attacker is able to bypass a proxy by providing a URL that responds with a redirect to a restricted host or IP address. |
| CVE-2020-28043 | MISP through 2.4.133 allows SSRF in the REST client via the use_full_path parameter with an arbitrary URL. |
| CVE-2020-27626 | JetBrains YouTrack before 2020.3.5333 was vulnerable to SSRF. |
| CVE-2020-27624 | JetBrains YouTrack before 2020.3.888 was vulnerable to SSRF. |
| CVE-2020-27197 | ** DISPUTED ** TAXII libtaxii through 1.1.117, as used in EclecticIQ OpenTAXII through 0.2.0 and other products, allows SSRF via an initial http:// substring to the parse method, even when the no_network setting is used for the XML parser. NOTE: the vendor points out that the parse method "wraps the lxml library" and that this may be an issue to "raise ... to the lxml group." |
| CVE-2020-26948 | Emby Server before 4.5.0 allows SSRF via the Items/RemoteSearch/Image ImageURL parameter. |
| CVE-2020-26831 | SAP BusinessObjects BI Platform (Crystal Report), versions - 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, does not sufficiently validate uploaded XML entities during crystal report generation due to missing XML validation, An attacker with basic privileges can inject some arbitrary XML entities leading to internal file disclosure, internal directories disclosure, Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) and denial-of-service (DoS). |
| CVE-2020-26811 | SAP Commerce Cloud (Accelerator Payment Mock), versions - 1808, 1811, 1905, 2005, allows an unauthenticated attacker to submit a crafted request over a network to a particular SAP Commerce module URL which will be processed without further interaction, the crafted request leads to Server Side Request Forgery attack which could lead to retrieval of limited pieces of information about the service with no impact on integrity or availability. |
| CVE-2020-26291 | URI.js is a javascript URL mutation library (npm package urijs). In URI.js before version 1.19.4, the hostname can be spoofed by using a backslash (`\`) character followed by an at (`@`) character. If the hostname is used in security decisions, the decision may be incorrect. Depending on library usage and attacker intent, impacts may include allow/block list bypasses, SSRF attacks, open redirects, or other undesired behavior. For example the URL `https://expected-example.com\@observed-example.com` will incorrectly return `observed-example.com` if using an affected version. Patched versions correctly return `expected-example.com`. Patched versions match the behavior of other parsers which implement the WHATWG URL specification, including web browsers and Node's built-in URL class. Version 1.19.4 is patched against all known payload variants. Version 1.19.3 has a partial patch but is still vulnerable to a payload variant.] |
| CVE-2020-26247 | Nokogiri is a Rubygem providing HTML, XML, SAX, and Reader parsers with XPath and CSS selector support. In Nokogiri before version 1.11.0.rc4 there is an XXE vulnerability. XML Schemas parsed by Nokogiri::XML::Schema are trusted by default, allowing external resources to be accessed over the network, potentially enabling XXE or SSRF attacks. This behavior is counter to the security policy followed by Nokogiri maintainers, which is to treat all input as untrusted by default whenever possible. This is fixed in Nokogiri version 1.11.0.rc4. |
| CVE-2020-26032 | An SSRF issue was discovered in Zammad before 3.4.1. The SMS configuration interface for Massenversand is implemented in a way that renders the result of a test request to the User. An attacker can use this to request any URL via a GET request from the network interface of the server. This may lead to disclosure of information from intranet systems. |
| CVE-2020-25820 | BigBlueButton before 2.2.27 allows remote authenticated users to read local files and conduct SSRF attacks via an uploaded Office document that has a crafted URL in an ODF xlink field. |
| CVE-2020-25466 | A SSRF vulnerability exists in the downloadimage interface of CRMEB 3.0, which can remotely download arbitrary files on the server and remotely execute arbitrary code. |
| CVE-2020-25353 | A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in rConfig 3.9.5 has been fixed for 3.9.6. This vulnerability allowed remote authenticated attackers to open a connection to the machine via the deviceIpAddr and connPort parameters. |
| CVE-2020-24898 | The Table Filter and Charts for Confluence Server app before 5.3.26 (for Atlassian Confluence) allows SSRF via the "Table from CSV" macro (URL parameter). |
| CVE-2020-24881 | SSRF exists in osTicket before 1.14.3, where an attacker can add malicious file to server or perform port scanning. |
| CVE-2020-24815 | A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) affecting the PDF generation in MicroStrategy 10.4, 2019 before Update 6, and 2020 before Update 2 allows authenticated users to access the content of internal network resources or leak files from the local system via HTML containers embedded in a dossier/dashboard document. NOTE: 10.4., no fix will be released as version will reach end-of-life on 31/12/2020. |
| CVE-2020-24710 | Gophish before 0.11.0 allows SSRF attacks. |
| CVE-2020-24700 | OX App Suite through 7.10.3 allows SSRF because GET requests are sent to arbitrary domain names with an initial autoconfig. substring. |
| CVE-2020-24570 | An issue was discovered in MB CONNECT LINE mymbCONNECT24 and mbCONNECT24 through 2.6.1. There is a CSRF issue (with resultant SSRF) in the com_mb24proxy module, allowing attackers to steal session information from logged-in users with a crafted link. |
| CVE-2020-24548 | Ericom Access Server 9.2.0 (for AccessNow and Ericom Blaze) allows SSRF to make outbound WebSocket connection requests on arbitrary TCP ports, and provides "Cannot connect to" error messages to inform the attacker about closed ports. |
| CVE-2020-24444 | AEM Forms SP6 add-on for AEM 6.5.6.0 and Forms add-on package for AEM 6.4 Service Pack 8 Cumulative Fix Pack 2 (6.4.8.2) have a blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. This vulnerability could be exploited by an unauthenticated attacker to gather information about internal systems that reside on the same network. |
| CVE-2020-24327 | Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in Discourse 2.3.2 and 2.6 via the email function. When writing an email in an editor, you can upload pictures of remote websites. |
| CVE-2020-24149 | Server-side request forgery (SSRF) in the Podcast Importer SecondLine (podcast-importer-secondline) plugin 1.1.4 for WordPress via the podcast_feed parameter in a secondline_import_initialize action to the secondlinepodcastimport page. |
| CVE-2020-24148 | Server-side request forgery (SSRF) in the Import XML and RSS Feeds (import-xml-feed) plugin 2.0.1 for WordPress via the data parameter in a moove_read_xml action. |
| CVE-2020-24063 | The Canto plugin 1.3.0 for WordPress allows includes/lib/download.php?subdomain= SSRF. |
| CVE-2020-23776 | A SSRF vulnerability exists in Winmail 6.5 in app.php in the key parameter when HTTPS is on. An attacker can use this vulnerability to cause the server to send a request to a specific URL. An attacker can modify the request header 'HOST' value to cause the server to send the request. |
| CVE-2020-23534 | A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Upgrade.php of gopeak masterlab 2.1.5, via the 'source' parameter. |
| CVE-2020-23079 | SSRF vulnerability in Halo <=1.3.2 exists in the SMTP configuration, which can detect the server intranet. |
| CVE-2020-22983 | A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in MicroStrategy Web SDK 11.1 and earlier, allows remote unauthenticated attackers to conduct a server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack via the srcURL parameter to the shortURL task. |
| CVE-2020-22002 | An Unauthenticated Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in Inim Electronics Smartliving SmartLAN/G/SI <=6.x within the GetImage functionality. The application parses user supplied data in the GET parameter 'host' to construct an image request to the service through onvif.cgi. Since no validation is carried out on the parameter, an attacker can specify an external domain and force the application to make an HTTP request to an arbitrary destination host. |
| CVE-2020-21788 | In CRMEB 3.1.0+ strict domain name filtering leads to SSRF(Server-Side Request Forgery). The vulnerable code is in file /crmeb/app/admin/controller/store/CopyTaobao.php. |
| CVE-2020-21653 | Myucms v2.2.1 contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) in the component \controller\index.php, which can be exploited via the sj() method. |
| CVE-2020-21649 | Myucms v2.2.1 contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) in the component \controller\index.php, which can be exploited via the sql() method. |
| CVE-2020-21122 | UReport v2.2.9 contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the designer page which allows attackers to detect intranet device ports. |
| CVE-2020-20582 | A server side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in /ApiAdminDomainSettings.php of MipCMS 5.0.1 allows attackers to access sensitive information. |
| CVE-2020-20341 | YzmCMS v5.5 contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) in the grab_image() function. |
| CVE-2020-19613 | Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in saveUrlAs function in ImagesService.java in sunkaifei FlyCMS version 20190503. |
| CVE-2020-1925 | Apache Olingo versions 4.0.0 to 4.7.0 provide the AsyncRequestWrapperImpl class which reads a URL from the Location header, and then sends a GET or DELETE request to this URL. It may allow to implement a SSRF attack. If an attacker tricks a client to connect to a malicious server, the server can make the client call any URL including internal resources which are not directly accessible by the attacker. |
| CVE-2020-17513 | In Apache Airflow versions prior to 1.10.13, the Charts and Query View of the old (Flask-admin based) UI were vulnerable for SSRF attack. |
| CVE-2020-16248 | ** DISPUTED ** Prometheus Blackbox Exporter through 0.17.0 allows /probe?target= SSRF. NOTE: follow-on discussion suggests that this might plausibly be interpreted as both intended functionality and also a vulnerability. |
| CVE-2020-16171 | An issue was discovered in Acronis Cyber Backup before 12.5 Build 16342. Some API endpoints on port 9877 under /api/ams/ accept an additional custom Shard header. The value of this header is afterwards used in a separate web request issued by the application itself. This can be abused to conduct SSRF attacks against otherwise unreachable Acronis services that are bound to localhost such as the NotificationService on 127.0.0.1:30572. |
| CVE-2020-15879 | Bitwarden Server 1.35.1 allows SSRF because it does not consider certain IPv6 addresses (ones beginning with fc, fd, fe, or ff, and the :: address) and certain IPv4 addresses (0.0.0.0/8, 127.0.0.0/8, and 169.254.0.0/16). |
| CVE-2020-15823 | JetBrains YouTrack before 2020.2.8873 is vulnerable to SSRF in the Workflow component. |
| CVE-2020-15822 | In JetBrains YouTrack before 2020.2.10514, SSRF is possible because URL filtering can be escaped. |
| CVE-2020-15819 | JetBrains YouTrack before 2020.2.10643 was vulnerable to SSRF that allowed scanning internal ports. |
| CVE-2020-15809 | spxmanage on certain SpinetiX devices allows requests that access unintended resources because of SSRF and Path Traversal. This affects HMP350, HMP300, and DiVA through 4.5.2-1.0.36229; HMP400 and HMP400W through 4.5.2-1.0.2-1eb2ffbd; and DSOS through 4.5.2-1.0.2-1eb2ffbd. |
| CVE-2020-15594 | An SSRF issue was discovered in Zoho Application Control Plus before version 10.0.511. The mail gateway configuration feature allows an attacker to perform a scan in order to discover open ports on a machine as well as available machines on the network segment on which the instance of the product is deployed. |
| CVE-2020-15377 | Webtools in Brocade SANnav before version 2.1.1 allows unauthenticated users to make requests to arbitrary hosts due to a misconfiguration; this is commonly referred to as Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). |
| CVE-2020-15352 | An XML external entity (XXE) vulnerability in Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) before 9.1R9 and Pulse Policy Secure (PPS) before 9.1R9 allows remote authenticated admins to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via a crafted DTD in an XML request. |
| CVE-2020-15002 | OX App Suite through 7.10.3 allows SSRF via the the /ajax/messaging/message message API. |
| CVE-2020-14327 | A Server-side request forgery (SSRF) flaw was found in Ansible Tower in versions before 3.6.5 and before 3.7.2. Functionality on the Tower server is abused by supplying a URL that could lead to the server processing it. This flaw leads to the connection to internal services or the exposure of additional internal services by abusing the test feature of lookup credentials to forge HTTP/HTTPS requests from the server and retrieving the results of the response. |
| CVE-2020-14296 | Red Hat CloudForms 4.7 and 5 was vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) flaw. With the access to add Ansible Tower provider, an attacker could scan and attack systems from the internal network which are not normally accessible. |
| CVE-2020-14170 | Webhooks in Atlassian Bitbucket Server from version 5.4.0 before version 7.3.1 allow remote attackers to access the content of internal network resources via a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. |
| CVE-2020-14160 | An SSRF vulnerability in Gotenberg through 6.2.1 exists in the remote URL to PDF conversion, which results in a remote attacker being able to read local files or fetch intranet resources. |
| CVE-2020-14044 | ** PRODUCT NOT SUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED ** A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was found in Codiad v1.7.8 and later. A user with admin privileges could use the plugin install feature to make the server request any URL via components/market/class.market.php. This could potentially result in remote code execution. NOTE: the vendor states "Codiad is no longer under active maintenance by core contributors." |
| CVE-2020-14029 | An issue was discovered in Ozeki NG SMS Gateway through 4.17.6. The RSS To SMS module processes XML files in an unsafe manner. This opens the application to an XML External Entity attack that can be used to perform SSRF or read arbitrary local files. |
| CVE-2020-14023 | Ozeki NG SMS Gateway through 4.17.6 allows SSRF via SMS WCF or RSS To SMS. |
| CVE-2020-13970 | Shopware before 6.2.3 is vulnerable to a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in its "Mediabrowser upload by URL" feature. This allows an authenticated user to send HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, and SFTP requests on behalf of the Shopware platform server. |
| CVE-2020-13788 | Harbor prior to 2.0.1 allows SSRF with this limitation: an attacker with the ability to edit projects can scan ports of hosts accessible on the Harbor server's intranet. |
| CVE-2020-13650 | An issue was discovered in DigDash 2018R2 before p20200210 and 2019R1 before p20200210. The login page is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) that allows use of the application as a proxy. Sent to an external server, a forged request discloses application credentials. For a request to an internal component, the request is blind, but through the error message it's possible to determine whether the request targeted a open service. |
| CVE-2020-13484 | Bitrix24 through 20.0.975 allows SSRF via an intranet IP address in the services/main/ajax.php?action=attachUrlPreview url parameter, if the destination URL hosts an HTML document containing '<meta name="og:image" content="' followed by an intranet URL. |
| CVE-2020-13379 | The avatar feature in Grafana 3.0.1 through 7.0.1 has an SSRF Incorrect Access Control issue. This vulnerability allows any unauthenticated user/client to make Grafana send HTTP requests to any URL and return its result to the user/client. This can be used to gain information about the network that Grafana is running on. Furthermore, passing invalid URL objects could be used for DOS'ing Grafana via SegFault. |
| CVE-2020-13309 | A vulnerability was discovered in GitLab versions before 13.1.10, 13.2.8 and 13.3.4. GitLab was vulnerable to a blind SSRF attack through the repository mirroring feature. |
| CVE-2020-13295 | For GitLab Runner before 13.0.12, 13.1.6, 13.2.3, by replacing dockerd with a malicious server, the Shared Runner is susceptible to SSRF. |
| CVE-2020-13226 | WSO2 API Manager 3.0.0 does not properly restrict outbound network access from a Publisher node, opening up the possibility of SSRF to this node's entire intranet. |
| CVE-2020-12725 | Havoc Research discovered an authenticated Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the "JSON" data source of Redash open-source 8.0.0 and prior. Possibly, other connectors are affected. The SSRF is potent and provides a lot of flexibility in terms of being able to craft HTTP requests e.g., by adding headers, selecting any HTTP verb, etc. |
| CVE-2020-12644 | OX App Suite 7.10.3 and earlier allows SSRF, related to the mail account API and the /folder/list API. |
| CVE-2020-12642 | An issue was discovered in service-api before 4.3.12 and 5.x before 5.1.1 for Report Portal. It allows XXE, with resultant secrets disclosure and SSRF, via JUnit XML launch import. |
| CVE-2020-12529 | An issue was discovered in MB connect line mymbCONNECT24 and mbCONNECT24 software in all versions through V2.6.2 There is a SSRF in the LDAP access check, allowing an attacker to scan for open ports. |
| CVE-2020-11980 | In Karaf, JMX authentication takes place using JAAS and authorization takes place using ACL files. By default, only an "admin" can actually invoke on an MBean. However there is a vulnerability there for someone who is not an admin, but has a "viewer" role. In the 'etc/jmx.acl.cfg', such as role can call get*. It's possible to authenticate as a viewer role + invokes on the MLet getMBeansFromURL method, which goes off to a remote server to fetch the desired MBean, which is then registered in Karaf. At this point the attack fails as "viewer" doesn't have the permission to invoke on the MBean. Still, it could act as a SSRF style attack and also it essentially allows a "viewer" role to pollute the MBean registry, which is a kind of privilege escalation. The vulnerability is low as it's possible to add a ACL to limit access. Users should update to Apache Karaf 4.2.9 or newer. |
| CVE-2020-11887 | svg2png 4.1.1 allows XSS with resultant SSRF via JavaScript inside an SVG document. |
| CVE-2020-11885 | WSO2 Enterprise Integrator through 6.6.0 has an XXE vulnerability where a user (with admin console access) can use the XML validator to make unintended network invocations such as SSRF via an uploaded file. |
| CVE-2020-11453 | ** DISPUTED ** Microstrategy Web 10.4 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in the Test Web Service functionality exposed through the path /MicroStrategyWS/. The functionality requires no authentication and, while it is not possible to pass parameters in the SSRF request, it is still possible to exploit it to conduct port scanning. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to enumerate the resources allocated in the network (IP addresses and services exposed). NOTE: MicroStrategy is unable to reproduce the issue reported in any version of its product. |
| CVE-2020-11452 | Microstrategy Web 10.4 includes functionality to allow users to import files or data from external resources such as URLs or databases. By providing an external URL under attacker control, it's possible to send requests to external resources (aka SSRF) or leak files from the local system using the file:// stream wrapper. |
| CVE-2020-11451 | The Upload Visualization plugin in the Microstrategy Web 10.4 admin panel allows an administrator to upload a ZIP archive containing files with arbitrary extensions and data. (This is also exploitable via SSRF). Note: The ability to upload visualization plugins requires administrator privileges. |
| CVE-2020-10980 | GitLab EE/CE 8.0.rc1 to 12.9 is vulnerable to a blind SSRF in the FogBugz integration. |
| CVE-2020-10956 | GitLab 8.10 and later through 12.9 is vulnerable to an SSRF in a project import note feature. |
| CVE-2020-10791 | app/Plugin/GrafanaModule/Controller/GrafanaConfigurationController.php in openITCOCKPIT before 3.7.3 allows remote authenticated users to trigger outbound TCP requests (aka SSRF) via the Test Connection feature (aka testGrafanaConnection) of the Grafana Module. |
| CVE-2020-10770 | A flaw was found in Keycloak before 13.0.0, where it is possible to force the server to call out an unverified URL using the OIDC parameter request_uri. This flaw allows an attacker to use this parameter to execute a Server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack. |
| CVE-2020-10252 | An issue was discovered in ownCloud before 10.4. Because of an SSRF issue (via the apps/files_sharing/external remote parameter), an authenticated attacker can interact with local services blindly (aka Blind SSRF) or conduct a Denial Of Service attack. |
| CVE-2020-10212 | upload.php in Responsive FileManager 9.13.4 and 9.14.0 allows SSRF via the url parameter because file-extension blocking is mishandled and because it is possible for a DNS hostname to resolve to an internal IP address. For example, an SSRF attempt may succeed if a .ico filename is added to the PATH_INFO. Also, an attacker could create a DNS hostname that resolves to the 0.0.0.0 IP address for DNS pinning. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2018-14728. |
| CVE-2020-10077 | GitLab EE 3.0 through 12.8.1 allows SSRF. An internal investigation revealed that a particular deprecated service was creating a server side request forgery risk. |
| CVE-2019-9827 | Hawt Hawtio through 2.5.0 is vulnerable to SSRF, allowing a remote attacker to trigger an HTTP request from an affected server to an arbitrary host via the initial /proxy/ substring of a URI. |
| CVE-2019-9621 | Zimbra Collaboration Suite before 8.6 patch 13, 8.7.x before 8.7.11 patch 10, and 8.8.x before 8.8.10 patch 7 or 8.8.x before 8.8.11 patch 3 allows SSRF via the ProxyServlet component. |
| CVE-2019-9187 | ikiwiki before 3.20170111.1 and 3.2018x and 3.2019x before 3.20190228 allows SSRF via the aggregate plugin. The impact also includes reading local files via file: URIs. |
| CVE-2019-9174 | An issue was discovered in GitLab Community and Enterprise Edition before 11.6.10, 11.7.x before 11.7.6, and 11.8.x before 11.8.1. It allows SSRF. |
| CVE-2019-8982 | com/wavemaker/studio/StudioService.java in WaveMaker Studio 6.6 mishandles the studioService.download?method=getContent&inUrl= value, leading to disclosure of local files and SSRF. |
| CVE-2019-8451 | The /plugins/servlet/gadgets/makeRequest resource in Jira before version 8.4.0 allows remote attackers to access the content of internal network resources via a Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability due to a logic bug in the JiraWhitelist class. |
| CVE-2019-8156 | A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in Magento 2.2 prior to 2.2.10, Magento 2.3 prior to 2.3.3 or 2.3.2-p1. An authenticated user with admin privileges to modify store configurations can manipulate the connector api endpoint to enable remote code execution. |
| CVE-2019-7923 | A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in Magento 2.1 prior to 2.1.18, Magento 2.2 prior to 2.2.9, Magento 2.3 prior to 2.3.2. This can be exploited by authenticated user with admin privileges to manipulate shipment settings to execute arbitrary code. |
| CVE-2019-7913 | A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in Magento 2.1 prior to 2.1.18, Magento 2.2 prior to 2.2.9, Magento 2.3 prior to 2.3.2. This can be exploited by an authenticated user with admin privileges to manipulate shipment methods to execute arbitrary code. |
| CVE-2019-7911 | A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in Magento Open Source prior to 1.9.4.2, and Magento Commerce prior to 1.14.4.2, Magento 2.1 prior to 2.1.18, Magento 2.2 prior to 2.2.9, Magento 2.3 prior to 2.3.2. This can be exploited by an authenticated user with access to the admin panel to manipulate system configuration and execute arbitrary code. |
| CVE-2019-7652 | TheHive Project UnshortenLink analyzer before 1.1, included in Cortex-Analyzers before 1.15.2, has SSRF. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker must create a new analysis, select URL for Data Type, and provide an SSRF payload like "http://127.0.0.1:22" in the Data parameter. The result can be seen in the main dashboard. Thus, it is possible to do port scans on localhost and intranet hosts. |
| CVE-2019-7616 | Kibana versions before 6.8.2 and 7.2.1 contain a server side request forgery (SSRF) flaw in the graphite integration for Timelion visualizer. An attacker with administrative Kibana access could set the timelion:graphite.url configuration option to an arbitrary URL. This could possibly lead to an attacker accessing external URL resources as the Kibana process on the host system. |
| CVE-2019-6981 | Zimbra Collaboration Suite 8.7.x through 8.8.11 allows Blind SSRF in the Feed component. |
| CVE-2019-6970 | Moodle 3.5.x before 3.5.4 allows SSRF. |
| CVE-2019-6837 | A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF): CWE-918 vulnerability exists in U.motion Server (MEG6501-0001 - U.motion KNX server, MEG6501-0002 - U.motion KNX Server Plus, MEG6260-0410 - U.motion KNX Server Plus, Touch 10, MEG6260-0415 - U.motion KNX Server Plus, Touch 15), which could cause server configuration data to be exposed when an attacker modifies a URL. |
| CVE-2019-6793 | An issue was discovered in GitLab Enterprise Edition before 11.5.8, 11.6.x before 11.6.6, and 11.7.x before 11.7.1. The Jira integration feature is vulnerable to an unauthenticated blind SSRF issue. |
| CVE-2019-6516 | An issue was discovered in WSO2 Dashboard Server 2.0.0. It is possible to force the application to perform requests to the internal workstation (port-scanning) and to perform requests to adjacent workstations (network-scanning), aka SSRF. |
| CVE-2019-6512 | An issue was discovered in WSO2 API Manager 2.6.0. It is possible to force the application to perform requests to the internal workstation (SSRF port-scanning), other adjacent workstations (SSRF network scanning), or to enumerate files because of the existence of the file:// wrapper. |
| CVE-2019-6257 | A Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in elFinder before 2.1.46 could allow a malicious user to access the content of internal network resources. This occurs in get_remote_contents() in php/elFinder.class.php. |
| CVE-2019-5725 | qibosoft through V7 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via the member/index.php main parameter, as demonstrated by SSRF to a URL on the same web site to read a .sql file. |
| CVE-2019-5464 | A flawed DNS rebinding protection issue was discovered in GitLab CE/EE 10.2 and later in the `url_blocker.rb` which could result in SSRF where the library is utilized. |
| CVE-2019-4741 | IBM Content Navigator 3.0CD is vulnerable to Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF). This may allow an unauthenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 172815. |
| CVE-2019-4262 | IBM QRadar SIEM 7.2 and 7.3 is vulnerable to Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF). This may allow an unauthenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the QRadar system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 160014. |
| CVE-2019-4203 | IBM API Connect 5.0.0.0 and 5.0.8.6 Developer Portal can be exploited by app developers to download arbitrary files from the host OS and potentially carry out SSRF attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 159124. |
| CVE-2019-3905 | Zoho ManageEngine ADSelfService Plus 5.x before build 5703 has SSRF. |
| CVE-2019-3809 | A flaw was found in Moodle versions 3.1 to 3.1.15 and earlier unsupported versions. The mybackpack functionality allowed setting the URL of badges, when it should be restricted to the Mozilla Open Badges backpack URL. This resulted in the possibility of blind SSRF via requests made by the page. |
| CVE-2019-20872 | An issue was discovered in Mattermost Server before 5.9.0, 5.8.1, 5.7.3, and 4.10.8. SSRF can attack local services. |
| CVE-2019-20474 | An issue was discovered in Zoho ManageEngine Remote Access Plus 10.0.447. The service to test the mail-server configuration suffers from an authorization issue allowing a user with the Guest role (read-only access) to use and abuse it. One of the abuses allows performing network and port scan operations of the localhost or the hosts on the same network segment, aka SSRF. |
| CVE-2019-20408 | The /plugins/servlet/gadgets/makeRequest resource in Jira before version 8.7.0 allows remote attackers to access the content of internal network resources via a Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability due to a logic bug in the JiraWhitelist class. |
| CVE-2019-20055 | LuquidPixels LiquiFire OS 4.8.0 allows SSRF via the call%3Durl substring followed by a URL in square brackets. |
| CVE-2019-19835 | SSRF in AjaxRestrictedCmdStat in zap in Ruckus Wireless Unleashed through 200.7.10.102.64 allows a remote denial of service via the server attribute to the tools/_rcmdstat.jsp URI. |
| CVE-2019-19261 | GitLab Enterprise Edition (EE) 6.7 and later through 12.5 allows SSRF. |
| CVE-2019-18846 | OX App Suite through 7.10.2 allows SSRF. |
| CVE-2019-18394 | A Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in FaviconServlet.java in Ignite Realtime Openfire through 4.4.2 allows attackers to send arbitrary HTTP GET requests. |
| CVE-2019-18379 | Symantec Messaging Gateway, prior to 10.7.3, may be susceptible to a server-side request forgery (SSRF) exploit, which is a type of issue that can let an attacker send crafted requests from the backend server of a vulnerable web application or access services available through the loopback interface. |
| CVE-2019-18355 | An SSRF issue was discovered in the legacy Web launcher in Thycotic Secret Server before 10.7. |
| CVE-2019-18213 | XML Language Server (aka lsp4xml) before 0.9.1, as used in Red Hat XML Language Support (aka vscode-xml) before 0.9.1 for Visual Studio and other products, allows XXE via a crafted XML document, with resultant SSRF (as well as SMB connection initiation that can lead to NetNTLM challenge/response capture for password cracking). This occurs in extensions/contentmodel/participants/diagnostics/LSPXMLParserConfiguration.java. |
| CVE-2019-17670 | WordPress before 5.2.4 has a Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability because Windows paths are mishandled during certain validation of relative URLs. |
| CVE-2019-17669 | WordPress before 5.2.4 has a Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability because URL validation does not consider the interpretation of a name as a series of hex characters. |
| CVE-2019-17400 | The unoconv package before 0.9 mishandles untrusted pathnames, leading to SSRF and local file inclusion. |
| CVE-2019-16948 | An SSRF issue was discovered in Enghouse Web Chat 6.1.300.31. In any POST request, one can replace the port number at WebServiceLocation=http://localhost:8085/UCWebServices/ with a range of ports to determine what is visible on the internal network (as opposed to what general web traffic would see on the product's host). The response from open ports is different than from closed ports. The product does not allow one to change the protocol: anything except http(s) will throw an error; however, it is the type of error that allows one to determine if a port is open or not. |
| CVE-2019-16932 | A blind SSRF vulnerability exists in the Visualizer plugin before 3.3.1 for WordPress via wp-json/visualizer/v1/upload-data. |
| CVE-2019-1679 | A vulnerability in the web interface of Cisco TelePresence Conductor, Cisco Expressway Series, and Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server (VCS) Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to trigger an HTTP request from an affected server to an arbitrary host. This type of attack is commonly referred to as server-side request forgery (SSRF). The vulnerability is due to insufficient access controls for the REST API of Cisco Expressway Series and Cisco TelePresence VCS. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by submitting a crafted HTTP request to the affected server. Versions prior to XC4.3.4 are affected. |
| CVE-2019-15730 | An issue was discovered in GitLab Community and Enterprise Edition 8.14 through 12.2.1. The Jira integration contains a SSRF vulnerability as a result of a bypass of the current protection mechanisms against this type of attack, which would allow sending requests to any resources accessible in the local network by the GitLab server. |
| CVE-2019-15728 | An issue was discovered in GitLab Community and Enterprise Edition 10.1 through 12.2.1. Protections against SSRF attacks on the Kubernetes integration are insufficient, which could have allowed an attacker to request any local network resource accessible from the GitLab server. |
| CVE-2019-15494 | openITCOCKPIT before 3.7.1 allows SSRF, aka RVID 5-445b21. |
| CVE-2019-15164 | rpcapd/daemon.c in libpcap before 1.9.1 allows SSRF because a URL may be provided as a capture source. |
| CVE-2019-15033 | Pydio 6.0.8 allows Authenticated SSRF during a Remote Link Feature download. An attacker can specify an intranet address in the file parameter to index.php, when sending a file to a remote server, as demonstrated by the file=http%3A%2F%2F192.168.1.2 substring. |
| CVE-2019-14704 | An SSRF issue was discovered in HTTPD on MicroDigital N-series cameras with firmware through 6400.0.8.5 via FTP commands following a newline character in the uploadfile field. |
| CVE-2019-14476 | AdRem NetCrunch 10.6.0.4587 has a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the NetCrunch server. Every user can trick the server into performing SMB requests to other systems. |
| CVE-2019-14277 | ** DISPUTED ** Axway SecureTransport 5.x through 5.3 (or 5.x through 5.5 with certain API configuration) is vulnerable to unauthenticated blind XML injection (and XXE) in the resetPassword functionality via the REST API. This vulnerability can lead to local file disclosure, DoS, or URI invocation attacks (i.e., SSRF with resultant remote code execution). NOTE: The vendor disputes this issues as not being a vulnerability because “All attacks that use external entities are blocked (no external DTD or file inclusions, no SSRF). The impact on confidentiality, integrity and availability is not proved on any version.” |
| CVE-2019-14255 | A Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in go-camo up to version 1.1.4 allows a remote attacker to perform HTTP requests to internal endpoints. |
| CVE-2019-14225 | OX App Suite 7.10.1 and 7.10.2 allows SSRF. |
| CVE-2019-13335 | SalesAgility SuiteCRM 7.10.x 7.10.19 and 7.11.x before and 7.11.7 has SSRF. |
| CVE-2019-13176 | An issue was discovered in the 3CX Phone system (web) management console 12.5.44178.1002 through 12.5 SP2. The Content.MainForm.wgx component is affected by XXE via a crafted XML document in POST data. There is potential to use this for SSRF (reading local files, outbound HTTP, and outbound DNS). |
| CVE-2019-13121 | An issue was discovered in GitLab Enterprise Edition 10.6 through 12.0.2. The GitHub project integration was vulnerable to an SSRF vulnerability which allowed an attacker to make requests to local network resources. It has Incorrect Access Control. |
| CVE-2019-13020 | The fetch API in Tightrope Media Carousel before 7.1.3 has CarouselAPI/v0/fetch?url= SSRF. This has two potential areas for abuse. First, a specially crafted URL could be used in a phishing attack to hijack the trust the user and the browser have with the website and could serve malicious content from a third-party attacker-controlled system. Second, arguably more severe, is the potential for an attacker to circumvent firewall controls, by proxying traffic, unauthenticated, into the internal network from the internet. |
| CVE-2019-12994 | Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) exists in Zoho ManageEngine AssetExplorer version 6.2.0 for the AJaxServlet servlet via a parameter in a URL. |
| CVE-2019-12959 | Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) exists in Zoho ManageEngine AssetExplorer 6.2.0 and before for the ClientUtilServlet servlet via a URL in a parameter. |
| CVE-2019-12852 | An SSRF attack was possible on a JetBrains YouTrack server. The issue (1 of 2) was fixed in JetBrains YouTrack 2018.4.49168. |
| CVE-2019-12633 | A vulnerability in Cisco Unified Contact Center Express (Unified CCX) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass access controls and conduct a server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack on a targeted system. The vulnerability is due to improper validation of user-supplied input on the affected system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending the user of the web application a crafted request. If the request is processed, the attacker could access the system and perform unauthorized actions. |
| CVE-2019-12632 | A vulnerability in Cisco Finesse could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass access controls and conduct a server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack on an affected system. The vulnerability exists because the affected system does not properly validate user-supplied input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted request to a user of the web application. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to access the system and perform unauthorized actions. |
| CVE-2019-12443 | An issue was discovered in GitLab Community and Enterprise Edition 10.2 through 11.11. Multiple features contained Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerabilities caused by an insufficient validation to prevent DNS rebinding attacks. |
| CVE-2019-12161 | WPO WebPageTest 19.04 allows SSRF because ValidateURL in www/runtest.php does not consider octal encoding of IP addresses (such as 0300.0250 as a replacement for 192.168). |
| CVE-2019-12153 | Lack of validation in the HTML parser in RealObjects PDFreactor before 10.1.10722 leads to SSRF, allowing attackers to access network or file resources on behalf of the server by supplying malicious HTML content. |
| CVE-2019-11897 | A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the backup & restore functionality in earlier versions than ProSyst mBS SDK 8.2.6 and Bosch IoT Gateway Software 9.3.0 allows a remote attacker to forge GET requests to arbitrary URLs. In addition, this could potentially allow an attacker to read sensitive zip files from the local server. |
| CVE-2019-11767 | Server side request forgery (SSRF) in phpBB before 3.2.6 allows checking for the existence of files and services on the local network of the host through the remote avatar upload function. |
| CVE-2019-11574 | An issue was discovered in Simple Machines Forum (SMF) before release 2.0.17. There is SSRF related to Subs-Package.php and Subs.php because user-supplied data is used directly in curl calls. |
| CVE-2019-11565 | Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) exists in the Print My Blog plugin before 1.6.7 for WordPress via the site parameter. |
| CVE-2019-11066 | openid.php in LightOpenID through 1.3.1 allows SSRF via a crafted OpenID 2.0 assertion request using the HTTP GET method. |
| CVE-2019-10686 | An SSRF vulnerability was found in an API from Ctrip Apollo through 1.4.0-SNAPSHOT. An attacker may use it to do an intranet port scan or raise a GET request via /system-info/health because the %23 substring is mishandled. |
| CVE-2019-0227 | A Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability affected the Apache Axis 1.4 distribution that was last released in 2006. Security and bug commits commits continue in the projects Axis 1.x Subversion repository, legacy users are encouraged to build from source. The successor to Axis 1.x is Axis2, the latest version is 1.7.9 and is not vulnerable to this issue. |
| CVE-2019-0193 | In Apache Solr, the DataImportHandler, an optional but popular module to pull in data from databases and other sources, has a feature in which the whole DIH configuration can come from a request's "dataConfig" parameter. The debug mode of the DIH admin screen uses this to allow convenient debugging / development of a DIH config. Since a DIH config can contain scripts, this parameter is a security risk. Starting with version 8.2.0 of Solr, use of this parameter requires setting the Java System property "enable.dih.dataConfigParam" to true. |
| CVE-2018-9920 | Server side request forgery exists in the runtime application in K2 smartforms 4.6.11 via a modified hostname in an https://*/Identity/STS/Forms/Scripts URL. |
| CVE-2018-9919 | A web-accessible backdoor, with resultant SSRF, exists in Tp-shop 2.0.5 through 2.0.8, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information, attack intranet hosts, or possibly trigger remote command execution, because /vendor/phpdocumentor/reflection-docblock/tests/phpDocumentor/Reflection/DocBlock/Tag/LinkTagTeet.php writes data from the "down_url" URL into the "bddlj" local file if the attacker knows the backdoor "jmmy" parameter. |
| CVE-2018-9302 | SSRF (Server Side Request Forgery) in /assets/lib/fuc.js.php in Cockpit 0.4.4 through 0.5.5 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files or send TCP traffic to intranet hosts via the url parameter. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2017-14611, which was about version 0.13.0, which (surprisingly) is an earlier version than 0.4.4. |
| CVE-2018-8939 | An SSRF issue was discovered in NmAPI.exe in Ipswitch WhatsUp Gold before 2018 (18.0). Malicious actors can submit specially crafted requests via the NmAPI executable to (1) gain unauthorized access to the WhatsUp Gold system, (2) obtain information about the WhatsUp Gold system, or (3) execute remote commands. |
| CVE-2018-8801 | GitLab Community and Enterprise Editions version 8.3 up to 10.x before 10.3 are vulnerable to SSRF in the Services and webhooks component. |
| CVE-2018-7667 | Adminer through 4.3.1 has SSRF via the server parameter. |
| CVE-2018-7055 | GroupViewProxyServlet in RoomWizard before 4.4.x allows SSRF via the url parameter. |
| CVE-2018-6186 | Citrix NetScaler VPX through NS12.0 53.13.nc allows an SSRF attack via the /rapi/read_url URI by an authenticated attacker who has a webapp account. The attacker can gain access to the nsroot account, and execute remote commands with root privileges. |
| CVE-2018-6029 | The copy function in application/admin/controller/Article.php in NoneCms 1.3.0 allows remote attackers to access the content of internal and external network resources via Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF), because URL validation only considers whether the URL contains the "csdn" substring. |
| CVE-2018-5752 | The backend component in Open-Xchange OX App Suite before 7.6.3-rev36, 7.8.x before 7.8.2-rev39, 7.8.3 before 7.8.3-rev44, and 7.8.4 before 7.8.4-rev22 allows remote attackers to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via vectors involving non-decimal representations of IP addresses and special IPv6 related addresses. |
| CVE-2018-3774 | Incorrect parsing in url-parse <1.4.3 returns wrong hostname which leads to multiple vulnerabilities such as SSRF, Open Redirect, Bypass Authentication Protocol. |
| CVE-2018-2463 | The Omni Commerce Connect API (OCC) of SAP Hybris Commerce, versions 6.*, is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks. This is due to a misconfiguration of XML parser that is used in the server-side implementation of OCC. |
| CVE-2018-2445 | AdminTools in SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence, versions 4.1, 4.2, allows an attacker to manipulate the vulnerable application to send crafted requests on behalf of the application, resulting in a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. |
| CVE-2018-2370 | Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in SAP Central Management Console, BI Launchpad and Fiori BI Launchpad, 4.10, from 4.20, from 4.30, could allow a malicious user to use common techniques to determine which ports are in use on the backend server. |
| CVE-2018-20687 | An XML external entity (XXE) vulnerability in CommandCenterWebServices/.*?wsdl in Raritan CommandCenter Secure Gateway before 8.0.0 allows remote unauthenticated users to read arbitrary files or conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via a crafted DTD in an XML request. |
| CVE-2018-20596 | Jspxcms v9.0.0 allows SSRF. |
| CVE-2018-20528 | JEECMS 9 has SSRF via the ueditor/getRemoteImage.jspx upfile parameter. |
| CVE-2018-20499 | An issue was discovered in GitLab Community and Enterprise Edition before 11.x before 11.4.13, 11.5.x before 11.5.6, and 11.6.x before 11.6.1. It allows SSRF. |
| CVE-2018-20497 | An issue was discovered in GitLab Community and Enterprise Edition before 11.4.13, 11.5.x before 11.5.6, and 11.6.x before 11.6.1. It allows SSRF. |
| CVE-2018-20463 | An issue was discovered in the JSmol2WP plugin 1.07 for WordPress. There is an arbitrary file read vulnerability via ../ directory traversal in query=php://filter/resource= in the jsmol.php query string. This can also be used for SSRF. |
| CVE-2018-20436 | ** DISPUTED ** The "secret chat" feature in Telegram 4.9.1 for Android has a "side channel" in which Telegram servers send GET requests for URLs typed while composing a chat message, before that chat message is sent. There are also GET requests to other URLs on the same web server. This also affects one or more other Telegram products, such as Telegram Web-version 0.7.0. In addition, it can be interpreted as an SSRF issue. NOTE: a third party has reported that potentially unwanted behavior is caused by misconfiguration of the "Secret chats > Preview links" setting. |
| CVE-2018-20228 | Subsonic V6.1.5 allows internetRadioSettings.view streamUrl CSRF, with resultant SSRF. |
| CVE-2018-1999017 | Pydio version 8.2.0 and earlier contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in plugins/action.updater/UpgradeManager.php Line: 154, getUpgradePath($url) that can result in an authenticated admin users requesting arbitrary URL's, pivoting requests through the server. This attack appears to be exploitable via the attacker gaining access to an administrative account, enters a URL into Upgrade Engine, and reloads the page or presses "Check Now". This vulnerability appears to have been fixed in 8.2.1. |
| CVE-2018-19858 | PrinceXML, versions 10 and below, is vulnerable to XXE due to the lack of protection against external entities. If an attacker passes HTML referencing an XML file (e.g., in an IFRAME element), PrinceXML will fetch the XML and parse it, thus giving an attacker file-read access and full-fledged SSRF. |
| CVE-2018-19651 | admin/functions/remote.php in Interspire Email Marketer through 6.1.6 has Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via a what=importurl&url= request with an http or https URL. This also allows reading local files with a file: URL. |
| CVE-2018-19601 | Rhymix CMS 1.9.8.1 allows SSRF via an index.php?module=admin&act=dispModuleAdminFileBox SVG upload. |
| CVE-2018-19571 | GitLab CE/EE, versions 8.18 up to 11.x before 11.3.11, 11.4 before 11.4.8, and 11.5 before 11.5.1, are vulnerable to an SSRF vulnerability in webhooks. |
| CVE-2018-19495 | An issue was discovered in GitLab Community and Enterprise Edition before 11.3.11, 11.4.x before 11.4.8, and 11.5.x before 11.5.1. There is an SSRF vulnerability in the Prometheus integration. |
| CVE-2018-19047 | ** DISPUTED ** mPDF through 7.1.6, if deployed as a web application that accepts arbitrary HTML, allows SSRF, as demonstrated by a '<img src="http://192.168' substring that triggers a call to getImage in Image/ImageProcessor.php. NOTE: the software maintainer disputes this, stating "If you allow users to pass HTML without sanitising it, you're asking for trouble." |
| CVE-2018-18867 | An SSRF issue was discovered in tecrail Responsive FileManager 9.13.4 via the upload.php url parameter. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2018-15495. |
| CVE-2018-18843 | The Kubernetes integration in GitLab Enterprise Edition 11.x before 11.2.8, 11.3.x before 11.3.9, and 11.4.x before 11.4.4 has SSRF. |
| CVE-2018-18753 | Typecho V1.1 allows remote attackers to send shell commands via base64-encoded serialized data, as demonstrated by SSRF. |
| CVE-2018-18737 | An XXE issue was discovered in Douchat 4.0.4 because Data\notify.php calls simplexml_load_string. This can also be used for SSRF. |
| CVE-2018-18646 | An issue was discovered in GitLab Community and Enterprise Edition before 11.2.7, 11.3.x before 11.3.8, and 11.4.x before 11.4.3. It allows SSRF. |
| CVE-2018-18471 | /api/2.0/rest/aggregator/xml in Axentra firmware, used by NETGEAR Stora, Seagate GoFlex Home, and MEDION LifeCloud, has an XXE vulnerability that can be chained with an SSRF bug to gain remote command execution as root. It can be triggered by anyone who knows the IP address of the affected device. |
| CVE-2018-17452 | An issue was discovered in GitLab Community and Enterprise Edition before 11.1.7, 11.2.x before 11.2.4, and 11.3.x before 11.3.1. There is Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via a loopback address to the validate_localhost function in url_blocker.rb. |
| CVE-2018-17450 | An issue was discovered in GitLab Community and Enterprise Edition before 11.1.7, 11.2.x before 11.2.4, and 11.3.x before 11.3.1. There is Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the Kubernetes integration, leading (for example) to disclosure of a GCP service token. |
| CVE-2018-17198 | Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF) and File Enumeration vulnerability in Apache Roller 5.2.1, 5.2.0 and earlier unsupported versions relies on Java SAX Parser to implement its XML-RPC interface and by default that parser supports external entities in XML DOCTYPE, which opens Roller up to SSRF / File Enumeration vulnerability. Note that this vulnerability exists even if Roller XML-RPC interface is disable via the Roller web admin UI. Mitigation: There are a couple of ways you can fix this vulnerability: 1) Upgrade to the latest version of Roller, which is now 5.2.2 2) Or, edit the Roller web.xml file and comment out the XML-RPC Servlet mapping as shown below: <!-- <servlet-mapping> <servlet-name>XmlRpcServlet</servlet-name> <url-pattern>/roller-services/xmlrpc</url-pattern> </servlet-mapping> --> |
| CVE-2018-17169 | An XML external entity (XXE) vulnerability in PrinterOn version 4.1.4 and lower allows remote authenticated users to read arbitrary files or conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via a crafted DTD in an XML request. |
| CVE-2018-16794 | Microsoft ADFS 4.0 Windows Server 2016 and previous (Active Directory Federation Services) has an SSRF vulnerability via the txtBoxEmail parameter in /adfs/ls. |
| CVE-2018-16793 | Rollup 18 for Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 SP3 and previous versions has an SSRF vulnerability via the username parameter in /owa/auth/logon.aspx in the OWA (Outlook Web Access) login page. |
| CVE-2018-16444 | An issue was discovered in SeaCMS 6.61. adm1n/admin_reslib.php has SSRF via the url parameter. |
| CVE-2018-16409 | In Gogs 0.11.53, an attacker can use migrate to send arbitrary HTTP GET requests, leading to SSRF. |
| CVE-2018-15895 | An SSRF vulnerability was discovered in idreamsoft iCMS 7.0.11 because the remote function in app/spider/spider_tools.class.php does not block DNS hostnames associated with private and reserved IP addresses, as demonstrated by 127.0.0.1 in an A record. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2018-14858. |
| CVE-2018-15657 | An SSRF issue was discovered in 42Gears SureMDM before 2018-11-27 via the /api/DownloadUrlResponse.ashx "url" parameter. |
| CVE-2018-15517 | The MailConnect feature on D-Link Central WiFiManager CWM-100 1.03 r0098 devices is intended to check a connection to an SMTP server but actually allows outbound TCP to any port on any IP address, leading to SSRF, as demonstrated by an index.php/System/MailConnect/host/127.0.0.1/port/22/secure/ URI. |
| CVE-2018-15516 | The FTP service on D-Link Central WiFiManager CWM-100 1.03 r0098 devices allows remote attackers to conduct a PORT command bounce scan via port 8000, resulting in SSRF. |
| CVE-2018-15495 | /filemanager/upload.php in Responsive FileManager before 9.13.3 allows Directory Traversal and SSRF because the url parameter is used directly in a curl_exec call, as demonstrated by a file:///etc/passwd value. |
| CVE-2018-15192 | An SSRF vulnerability in webhooks in Gitea through 1.5.0-rc2 and Gogs through 0.11.53 allows remote attackers to access intranet services. |
| CVE-2018-14858 | An SSRF vulnerability was discovered in idreamsoft iCMS before V7.0.11 because the remote function in app/spider/spider_tools.class.php does not block private and reserved IP addresses such as 10.0.0.0/8. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2018-14514. |
| CVE-2018-14728 | upload.php in Responsive FileManager 9.13.1 allows SSRF via the url parameter. |
| CVE-2018-14721 | FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.7 might allow remote attackers to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks by leveraging failure to block the axis2-jaxws class from polymorphic deserialization. |
| CVE-2018-14514 | An SSRF vulnerability was discovered in idreamsoft iCMS V7.0.9 that allows attackers to read sensitive files, access an intranet, or possibly have unspecified other impact. |
| CVE-2018-13790 | A Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in tools/files/importers/remote.php in concrete5 8.2.0 can lead to attacks on the local network and mapping of the internal network, because of URL functionality on the File Manager page. |
| CVE-2018-13404 | The VerifyPopServerConnection resource in Atlassian Jira before version 7.6.10, from version 7.7.0 before version 7.7.5, from version 7.8.0 before version 7.8.5, from version 7.9.0 before version 7.9.3, from version 7.10.0 before version 7.10.3, from version 7.11.0 before version 7.11.3, from version 7.12.0 before version 7.12.3, and from version 7.13.0 before version 7.13.1 allows remote attackers who have administrator rights to determine the existence of internal hosts & open ports and in some cases obtain service information from internal network resources via a Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. |
| CVE-2018-13103 | OX App Suite 7.8.4 and earlier allows SSRF. |
| CVE-2018-12678 | Portainer before 1.18.0 supports unauthenticated requests to the websocket endpoint with an unvalidated id query parameter for the /websocket/exec endpoint, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions or conduct SSRF attacks. |
| CVE-2018-12571 | uniquesig0/InternalSite/InitParams.aspx in Microsoft Forefront Unified Access Gateway 2010 allows remote attackers to trigger outbound DNS queries for arbitrary hosts via a comma-separated list of URLs in the orig_url parameter, possibly causing a traffic amplification and/or SSRF outcome. |
| CVE-2018-12463 | An XML external entity (XXE) vulnerability in Fortify Software Security Center (SSC), version 17.1, 17.2, 18.1 allows remote unauthenticated users to read arbitrary files or conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via a crafted DTD in an XML request. |
| CVE-2018-11586 | XML external entity (XXE) vulnerability in api/rest/status in SearchBlox 8.6.7 allows remote unauthenticated users to read arbitrary files or conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via a crafted DTD in an XML request. |
| CVE-2018-11031 | application/home/controller/debug.php in PHPRAP 1.0.4 through 1.0.8 has SSRF via the /debug URI, as demonstrated by an api[url]=file:////etc/passwd&api[method]=get POST request. |
| CVE-2018-10511 | A vulnerability in Trend Micro Control Manager (versions 6.0 and 7.0) could allow an attacker to conduct a server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack on vulnerable installations. |
| CVE-2018-10220 | ** DISPUTED ** Glastopf 3.1.3-dev has SSRF, as demonstrated by the abc.php a parameter. NOTE: the vendor indicates that this is intentional behavior because the product is a web application honeypot, and modules/handlers/emulators/rfi.py supports Remote File Inclusion emulation. |
| CVE-2018-10174 | Digital Guardian Management Console 7.1.2.0015 has an SSRF issue that allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via file:// URLs, send TCP traffic to intranet hosts, or obtain an NTLM hash. This can occur even if the logged-in user has a read-only role. |
| CVE-2018-1000838 | autopsy version <= 4.9.0 contains a XML External Entity (XXE) vulnerability in CaseMetadata XML Parser that can result in Disclosure of confidential data, denial of service, SSRF, port scanning. This attack appear to be exploitable via Specially crafted CaseMetadata. |
| CVE-2018-1000837 | UML Designer version <= 8.0.0 contains a XML External Entity (XXE) vulnerability in XML parser for plugins that can result in Disclosure of confidential data, denial of service, SSRF, port scanning. This attack appear to be exploitable via malicious plugins.xml file. |
| CVE-2018-1000836 | bw-calendar-engine version <= bw-calendar-engine-3.12.0 contains a XML External Entity (XXE) vulnerability in IscheduleClient XML Parser that can result in Disclosure of confidential data, denial of service, SSRF, port scanning. This attack appear to be exploitable via Man in the Middle or malicious server. |
| CVE-2018-1000835 | KeePassDX version <= 2.5.0.0beta17 contains a XML External Entity (XXE) vulnerability in kdbx file parser that can result in Disclosure of confidential data, denial of service, SSRF, port scanning. |
| CVE-2018-1000834 | runelite version <= runelite-parent-1.4.23 contains a XML External Entity (XXE) vulnerability in Man in the middle runscape services call that can result in Disclosure of confidential data, denial of service, SSRF, port scanning. |
| CVE-2018-1000833 | ZoneMinder version <= 1.32.2 contains a Other/Unknown vulnerability in User-controlled parameter that can result in Disclosure of confidential data, denial of service, SSRF, remote code execution. |
| CVE-2018-1000832 | ZoneMinder version <= 1.32.2 contains a Other/Unknown vulnerability in User-controlled parameter that can result in Disclosure of confidential data, denial of service, SSRF, remote code execution. |
| CVE-2018-1000831 | K9Mail version <= v5.600 contains a XML External Entity (XXE) vulnerability in WebDAV response parser that can result in Disclosure of confidential data, denial of service, SSRF, port scanning. This attack appear to be exploitable via malicious WebDAV server or intercept the reponse of a valid WebDAV server. |
| CVE-2018-1000830 | XR3Player version <= V3.124 contains a XML External Entity (XXE) vulnerability in Playlist parser that can result in Disclosure of confidential data, denial of service, SSRF, port scanning. |
| CVE-2018-1000829 | Anyplace version before commit 80359b4 contains a XML External Entity (XXE) vulnerability in Man in the middle on map API call that can result in Disclosure of confidential data, denial of service, SSRF, port scanning. This vulnerability appears to have been fixed in after commit 80359b4. |
| CVE-2018-1000828 | FrostWire version <= frostwire-desktop-6.7.4-build-272 contains a XML External Entity (XXE) vulnerability in Man in the middle on update that can result in Disclosure of confidential data, denial of service, SSRF, port scanning. This attack appear to be exploitable via Man in the middle the call to update the software. |
| CVE-2018-1000827 | Ubilling version <= 0.9.2 contains a Other/Unknown vulnerability in user-controlled parameter that can result in Disclosure of confidential data, denial of service, SSRF, remote code execution. |
| CVE-2018-1000825 | FreeCol version <= nightly-2018-08-22 contains a XML External Entity (XXE) vulnerability in FreeColXMLReader parser that can result in Disclosure of confidential data, denial of service, SSRF, port scanning. This attack appear to be exploitable via Freecol file. |
| CVE-2018-1000824 | MegaMek version < v0.45.1 contains a Other/Unknown vulnerability in Object Stream Connection that can result in Disclosure of confidential data, denial of service, SSRF, remote code execution. |
| CVE-2018-1000823 | exist version <= 5.0.0-RC4 contains a XML External Entity (XXE) vulnerability in XML Parser for REST Server that can result in Disclosure of confidential data, denial of service, SSRF, port scanning. |
| CVE-2018-1000822 | codelibs fess version before commit faa265b contains a XML External Entity (XXE) vulnerability in GSA XML file parser that can result in Disclosure of confidential data, denial of service, SSRF, port scanning. This attack appear to be exploitable via specially crafted GSA XML files. This vulnerability appears to have been fixed in after commit faa265b. |
| CVE-2018-1000821 | MicroMathematics version before commit 5c05ac8 contains a XML External Entity (XXE) vulnerability in SMathStudio files that can result in Disclosure of confidential data, denial of service, SSRF, port scanning. This attack appear to be exploitable via Specially crafted SMathStudio files. This vulnerability appears to have been fixed in after commit 5c05ac8. |
| CVE-2018-1000820 | neo4j-contrib neo4j-apoc-procedures version before commit 45bc09c contains a XML External Entity (XXE) vulnerability in XML Parser that can result in Disclosure of confidential data, denial of service, SSRF, port scanning. This vulnerability appears to have been fixed in after commit 45bc09c. |
| CVE-2018-1000138 | I, Librarian version 4.8 and earlier contains a SSRF vulnerability in "url" parameter of getFromWeb in functions.php that can result in the attacker abusing functionality on the server to read or update internal resources. |
| CVE-2018-1000124 | I Librarian I-librarian version 4.8 and earlier contains a XML External Entity (XXE) vulnerability in line 154 of importmetadata.php(simplexml_load_string) that can result in an attacker reading the contents of a file and SSRF. This attack appear to be exploitable via posting xml in the Parameter form_import_textarea. |
| CVE-2018-0398 | Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Finesse could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvg71018. |
| CVE-2017-9506 | The IconUriServlet of the Atlassian OAuth Plugin from version 1.3.0 before version 1.9.12 and from version 2.0.0 before version 2.0.4 allows remote attackers to access the content of internal network resources and/or perform an XSS attack via Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF). |
| CVE-2017-9458 | XML external entity (XXE) vulnerability in the GlobalProtect internal and external gateway interface in Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS before 6.1.18, 7.0.x before 7.0.17, 7.1.x before 7.1.12, and 8.0.x before 8.0.3 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information, cause a denial of service, or conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via unspecified vectors. |
| CVE-2017-9413 | Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Podcast feature in Subsonic 6.1.1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that (1) subscribe to a podcast via the add parameter to podcastReceiverAdmin.view or (2) update Internet Radio Settings via the urlRedirectCustomUrl parameter to networkSettings.view. NOTE: These vulnerabilities can be exploited to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks. |
| CVE-2017-9355 | XML external entity (XXE) vulnerability in the import playlist feature in Subsonic 6.1.1 might allow remote attackers to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via a crafted XSPF playlist file. |
| CVE-2017-9307 | SSRF vulnerability in remotedownload.php in Allen Disk 1.6 allows remote authenticated users to conduct port scans and access intranet servers via a crafted file parameter. |
| CVE-2017-9066 | In WordPress before 4.7.5, there is insufficient redirect validation in the HTTP class, leading to SSRF. |
| CVE-2017-8794 | An issue was discovered on Accellion FTA devices before FTA_9_12_180. Because a regular expression (intended to match local https URLs) lacks an initial ^ character, courier/web/1000@/wmProgressval.html allows SSRF attacks with a file:///etc/passwd#https:// URL pattern. |
| CVE-2017-7569 | In vBulletin before 5.3.0, remote attackers can bypass the CVE-2016-6483 patch and conduct SSRF attacks by leveraging the behavior of the PHP parse_url function, aka VBV-17037. |
| CVE-2017-7566 | MyBB before 1.8.11 allows remote attackers to bypass an SSRF protection mechanism. |
| CVE-2017-7553 | The external_request api call in App Studio (millicore) allows server side request forgery (SSRF). An attacker could use this flaw to probe the network internal resources, and access restricted endpoints. |
| CVE-2017-7503 | It was found that the Red Hat JBoss EAP 7.0.5 implementation of javax.xml.transform.TransformerFactory is vulnerable to XXE. An attacker could use this flaw to launch DoS or SSRF attacks, or read files from the server where EAP is deployed. |
| CVE-2017-7464 | It was found that the JAXP implementation used in JBoss EAP 7.0 for SAX and DOM parsing is vulnerable to certain XXE flaws. An attacker could use this flaw to cause DoS, SSRF, or information disclosure if they are able to provide XML content for parsing. |
| CVE-2017-7272 | PHP through 7.1.11 enables potential SSRF in applications that accept an fsockopen or pfsockopen hostname argument with an expectation that the port number is constrained. Because a :port syntax is recognized, fsockopen will use the port number that is specified in the hostname argument, instead of the port number in the second argument of the function. |
| CVE-2017-7200 | An SSRF issue was discovered in OpenStack Glance before Newton. The 'copy_from' feature in the Image Service API v1 allowed an attacker to perform masked network port scans. With v1, it is possible to create images with a URL such as 'http://localhost:22'. This could then allow an attacker to enumerate internal network details while appearing masked, since the scan would appear to originate from the Glance Image service. |
| CVE-2017-6130 | F5 SSL Intercept iApp 1.5.0 - 1.5.7 and SSL Orchestrator 2.0 is vulnerable to a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attack when deployed using the Dynamic Domain Bypass (DDB) feature feature plus SNAT Auto Map option for egress traffic. |
| CVE-2017-5643 | Apache Camel's Validation Component is vulnerable against SSRF via remote DTDs and XXE. |
| CVE-2017-5617 | The SVG Salamander (aka svgSalamander) library, when used in a web application, allows remote attackers to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via an xlink:href attribute in an SVG file. |
| CVE-2017-5518 | The media-file upload feature in GeniXCMS through 0.0.8 allows remote attackers to conduct SSRF attacks via a URL, as demonstrated by a URL with an intranet IP address. |
| CVE-2017-4928 | The flash-based vSphere Web Client (6.0 prior to 6.0 U3c and 5.5 prior to 5.5 U3f) i.e. not the new HTML5-based vSphere Client, contains SSRF and CRLF injection issues due to improper neutralization of URLs. An attacker may exploit these issues by sending a POST request with modified headers towards internal services leading to information disclosure. |
| CVE-2017-3164 | Server Side Request Forgery in Apache Solr, versions 1.3 until 7.6 (inclusive). Since the "shards" parameter does not have a corresponding whitelist mechanism, a remote attacker with access to the server could make Solr perform an HTTP GET request to any reachable URL. |
| CVE-2017-18638 | send_email in graphite-web/webapp/graphite/composer/views.py in Graphite through 1.1.5 is vulnerable to SSRF. The vulnerable SSRF endpoint can be used by an attacker to have the Graphite web server request any resource. The response to this SSRF request is encoded into an image file and then sent to an e-mail address that can be supplied by the attacker. Thus, an attacker can exfiltrate any information. |
| CVE-2017-18096 | The OAuth status rest resource in Atlassian Application Links before version 5.2.7, from 5.3.0 before 5.3.4 and from 5.4.0 before 5.4.3 allows remote attackers with administrative rights to access the content of internal network resources via a Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) by creating an OAuth application link to a location they control and then redirecting access from the linked location's OAuth status rest resource to an internal location. When running in an environment like Amazon EC2, this flaw maybe used to access to a metadata resource that provides access credentials and other potentially confidential information. |
| CVE-2017-18036 | The Github repository importer in Atlassian Bitbucket Server before version 5.3.0 allows remote attackers to determine if a service they could not otherwise reach has open ports via a Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. |
| CVE-2017-17697 | The Ping() function in ui/api/target.go in Harbor through 1.3.0-rc4 has SSRF via the endpoint parameter to /api/targets/ping. |
| CVE-2017-17674 | BMC Remedy Mid Tier 9.1SP3 is affected by remote and local file inclusion. Due to the lack of restrictions on what can be targeted, the system can be vulnerable to attacks such as system fingerprinting, internal port scanning, Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF), or remote code execution (RCE). |
| CVE-2017-16870 | ** DISPUTED ** The UpdraftPlus plugin through 1.13.12 for WordPress has SSRF in the updraft_ajax_handler function in /wp-content/plugins/updraftplus/admin.php via an httpget subaction. NOTE: the vendor reports that this does not cross a privilege boundary. |
| CVE-2017-16865 | The Trello importer in Atlassian Jira before version 7.6.1 allows remote attackers to access the content of internal network resources via a Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF). When running in an environment like Amazon EC2, this flaw maybe used to access to a metadata resource that provides access credentials and other potentially confidential information. |
| CVE-2017-16678 | Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in SAP NetWeaver Knowledge Management Configuration Service, EPBC and EPBC2 from 7.00 to 7.02; KMC-BC 7.30, 7.31, 7.40 and 7.50, that allows an attacker to manipulate the vulnerable application to send crafted requests on behalf of the application. |
| CVE-2017-16614 | SSRF (Server Side Request Forgery) in tpshop 2.0.5 and 2.0.6 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information, attack intranet hosts, or possibly trigger remote command execution via the plugins/payment/weixin/lib/WxPay.tedatac.php fBill parameter. |
| CVE-2017-15943 | The configuration file import for applications, spyware and vulnerability objects functionality in the web interface in Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS before 6.1.19, 7.0.x before 7.0.19, and 7.1.x before 7.1.14 allows remote attackers to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks and consequently obtain sensitive information via vectors related to parsing of external entities. |
| CVE-2017-15886 | Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Link Preview in Synology Chat before 2.0.0-1124 allows remote authenticated users to download arbitrary local files via a crafted URI. |
| CVE-2017-15644 | SSRF exists in Webmin 1.850 via the PATH_INFO to tunnel/link.cgi, as demonstrated by a GET request for tunnel/link.cgi/http://INTRANET-IP:8000. |
| CVE-2017-15280 | XML external entity (XXE) vulnerability in Umbraco CMS before 7.7.3 allows attackers to obtain sensitive information by reading files on the server or sending TCP requests to intranet hosts (aka SSRF), related to Umbraco.Web/umbraco.presentation/umbraco/dialogs/importDocumenttype.aspx.cs. |
| CVE-2017-15029 | Open-Xchange GmbH OX App Suite 7.8.4 and earlier is affected by: SSRF. |
| CVE-2017-14759 | OpenText Document Sciences xPression (formerly EMC Document Sciences xPression) v4.5SP1 Patch 13 (older versions might be affected as well) is prone to an XML External Entity vulnerability: /xFramework/services/QuickDoc.QuickDocHttpSoap11Endpoint/. An unauthenticated user is able to read directory listings or system files, or cause SSRF or Denial of Service. |
| CVE-2017-14611 | SSRF (Server Side Request Forgery) in Cockpit 0.13.0 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files or send TCP traffic to intranet hosts via the url parameter, related to use of the discontinued aheinze/fetch_url_contents component. |
| CVE-2017-14585 | A Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability could lead to remote code execution for authenticated administrators. This issue was introduced in version 2.2.0 of Hipchat Server and version 3.0.0 of Hipchat Data Center. Versions of Hipchat Server starting with 2.2.0 and before 2.2.6 are affected by this vulnerability. Versions of Hipchat Data Center starting with 3.0.0 and before 3.1.0 are affected. |
| CVE-2017-14323 | SSRF (Server Side Request Forgery) in getRemoteImage.php in Ueditor in Onethink V1.0 and V1.1 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information, attack intranet hosts, or possibly trigger remote command execution via the upfile parameter. |
| CVE-2017-13706 | XML external entity (XXE) vulnerability in the import package functionality of the deployment module in Lansweeper before 6.0.100.67 allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information, cause a denial of service, conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks, conduct internal port scans, or have unspecified other impact via an XML request, aka bug #572705. |
| CVE-2017-13667 | OX Software GmbH OX App Suite 7.8.4 and earlier is affected by: SSRF. |
| CVE-2017-12905 | Server Side Request Forgery vulnerability in Vebto Pixie Image Editor 1.4 and 1.7 allows remote attackers to disclose information or execute arbitrary code via the url parameter to Launderer.php. |
| CVE-2017-12629 | Remote code execution occurs in Apache Solr before 7.1 with Apache Lucene before 7.1 by exploiting XXE in conjunction with use of a Config API add-listener command to reach the RunExecutableListener class. Elasticsearch, although it uses Lucene, is NOT vulnerable to this. Note that the XML external entity expansion vulnerability occurs in the XML Query Parser which is available, by default, for any query request with parameters deftype=xmlparser and can be exploited to upload malicious data to the /upload request handler or as Blind XXE using ftp wrapper in order to read arbitrary local files from the Solr server. Note also that the second vulnerability relates to remote code execution using the RunExecutableListener available on all affected versions of Solr. |
| CVE-2017-12071 | Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in file_upload.php in Synology Photo Station before 6.7.4-3433 and 6.3-2968 allows remote authenticated users to download arbitrary local files via the url parameter. |
| CVE-2017-11457 | XML external entity (XXE) vulnerability in com.sap.km.cm.ice in SAP NetWeaver AS JAVA 7.5 allows remote authenticated users to read arbitrary files or conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via a crafted DTD in an XML request, aka SAP Security Note 2387249. |
| CVE-2017-11291 | An issue was discovered in Adobe Connect 9.6.2 and earlier versions. A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists that could be abused to bypass network access controls. |
| CVE-2017-11149 | Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Downloader in Synology Download Station 3.8.x before 3.8.5-3475 and 3.x before 3.5-2984 allows remote authenticated users to download arbitrary local files via crafted URI. |
| CVE-2017-11148 | Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in link preview in Synology Chat before 1.1.0-0806 allows remote authenticated users to access intranet resources via unspecified vectors. |
| CVE-2017-10973 | In FineCMS before 2017-07-06, application/lib/ajax/get_image_data.php has SSRF, related to requests for non-image files with a modified HTTP Host header. |
| CVE-2017-1000419 | phpBB version 3.2.0 is vulnerable to SSRF in the Remote Avatar function resulting allowing an attacker to perform port scanning, requesting internal content and potentially attacking such internal services via the web application. |
| CVE-2017-1000190 | SimpleXML (latest version 2.7.1) is vulnerable to an XXE vulnerability resulting SSRF, information disclosure, DoS and so on. |
| CVE-2017-0929 | DNN (aka DotNetNuke) before 9.2.0 suffers from a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the DnnImageHandler class. Attackers may be able to access information about internal network resources. |
| CVE-2017-0889 | Paperclip ruby gem version 3.1.4 and later suffers from a Server-SIde Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the Paperclip::UriAdapter class. Attackers may be able to access information about internal network resources. |
| CVE-2016-9752 | In Serendipity before 2.0.5, an attacker can bypass SSRF protection by using a malformed IP address (e.g., http://127.1) or a 30x (aka Redirection) HTTP status code. |
| CVE-2016-9417 | The fetch_remote_file function in MyBB (aka MyBulletinBoard) before 1.8.8 and MyBB Merge System before 1.8.8 allows remote attackers to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via unspecified vectors. |
| CVE-2016-7999 | ecrire/exec/valider_xml.php in SPIP 3.1.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to conduct server side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via a URL in the var_url parameter in a valider_xml action. |
| CVE-2016-7964 | The sendRequest method in HTTPClient Class in file /inc/HTTPClient.php in DokuWiki 2016-06-26a and older, when media file fetching is enabled, has no way to restrict access to private networks. This allows users to scan ports of internal networks via SSRF, such as 10.0.0.1/8, 172.16.0.0/12, and 192.168.0.0/16. |
| CVE-2016-7051 | XmlMapper in the Jackson XML dataformat component (aka jackson-dataformat-xml) before 2.7.8 and 2.8.x before 2.8.4 allows remote attackers to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via vectors related to a DTD. |
| CVE-2016-6798 | In the XSS Protection API module before 1.0.12 in Apache Sling, the method XSS.getValidXML() uses an insecure SAX parser to validate the input string, which allows for XXE attacks in all scripts which use this method to validate user input, potentially allowing an attacker to read sensitive data on the filesystem, perform same-site-request-forgery (SSRF), port-scanning behind the firewall or DoS the application. |
| CVE-2016-6621 | The setup script for phpMyAdmin before 4.0.10.19, 4.4.x before 4.4.15.10, and 4.6.x before 4.6.6 allows remote attackers to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via unspecified vectors. |
| CVE-2016-6483 | The media-file upload feature in vBulletin before 3.8.7 Patch Level 6, 3.8.8 before Patch Level 2, 3.8.9 before Patch Level 1, 4.x before 4.2.2 Patch Level 6, 4.2.3 before Patch Level 2, 5.x before 5.2.0 Patch Level 3, 5.2.1 before Patch Level 1, and 5.2.2 before Patch Level 1 allows remote attackers to conduct SSRF attacks via a crafted URL that results in a Redirection HTTP status code. |
| CVE-2016-6001 | IBM Forms Experience Builder could be susceptible to a server-side request forgery (SSRF) from the application design interface allowing for some information disclosure of internal resources. |
| CVE-2016-5968 | The Replay Server in IBM Tealeaf Customer Experience 8.x before 8.7.1.8847 FP10, 8.8.x before 8.8.0.9049 FP9, 9.0.0 and 9.0.1 before 9.0.1.1117 FP5, 9.0.1A before 9.0.1.5108 FP5, 9.0.2 before 9.0.2.1223 FP3, and 9.0.2A before 9.0.2.5224 FP3 allows remote attackers to conduct SSRF attacks via unspecified vectors. |
| CVE-2016-5002 | XML external entity (XXE) vulnerability in the Apache XML-RPC (aka ws-xmlrpc) library 3.1.3, as used in Apache Archiva, allows remote attackers to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via a crafted DTD. |
| CVE-2016-4791 | The administrative user interface in Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) 8.2 before 8.2r1, 8.1 before 8.1r2, 8.0 before 8.0r9, and 7.4 before 7.4r13.4 allows remote administrators to enumerate files, read arbitrary files, and conduct server side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via unspecified vectors. |
| CVE-2016-4374 | HPE Release Control (RC) 9.13, 9.20, and 9.21 before 9.21.0005 p4 allows remote authenticated users to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks, and consequently obtain sensitive information or cause a denial of service, via unspecified vectors. |
| CVE-2016-4371 | HPE Service Manager Software 9.30, 9.31, 9.32, 9.33, 9.34, 9.35, 9.40, and 9.41 allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information, modify data, and conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via unspecified vectors, related to the Server, Web Client, Windows Client, and Service Request components. |
| CVE-2016-4312 | XML external entity (XXE) vulnerability in the XACML flow feature in WSO2 Identity Server 5.1.0 before WSO2-CARBON-PATCH-4.4.0-0231 allows remote authenticated users with access to XACML features to read arbitrary files, cause a denial of service, conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks, or have unspecified other impact via a crafted XACML request to entitlement/eval-policy-submit.jsp. NOTE: this issue can be combined with CVE-2016-4311 to exploit the vulnerability without credentials. |
| CVE-2016-4029 | WordPress before 4.5 does not consider octal and hexadecimal IP address formats when determining an intranet address, which allows remote attackers to bypass an intended SSRF protection mechanism via a crafted address. |
| CVE-2016-3718 | The (1) HTTP and (2) FTP coders in ImageMagick before 6.9.3-10 and 7.x before 7.0.1-1 allow remote attackers to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via a crafted image. |
| CVE-2016-3647 | Symantec Endpoint Protection Manager (SEPM) 12.1 before RU6 MP5 allows remote authenticated users to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks, and trigger network traffic to arbitrary intranet hosts, via a crafted request. |
| CVE-2016-2222 | The wp_http_validate_url function in wp-includes/http.php in WordPress before 4.4.2 allows remote attackers to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via a zero value in the first octet of an IPv4 address in the u parameter to wp-admin/press-this.php. |
| CVE-2016-1373 | The gadgets-integration API in Cisco Finesse 8.5(1) through 8.5(5), 8.6(1), 9.0(1), 9.0(2), 9.1(1), 9.1(1)SU1, 9.1(1)SU1.1, 9.1(1)ES1 through 9.1(1)ES5, 10.0(1), 10.0(1)SU1, 10.0(1)SU1.1, 10.5(1), 10.5(1)ES1 through 10.5(1)ES4, 10.5(1)SU1, 10.5(1)SU1.1, 10.5(1)SU1.7, 10.6(1), 10.6(1)SU1, 10.6(1)SU2, and 11.0(1) allows remote attackers to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via a crafted request, aka Bug ID CSCuw86623. |
| CVE-2016-10927 | The nelio-ab-testing plugin before 4.5.11 for WordPress has SSRF in ajax/iesupport.php. |
| CVE-2016-10926 | The nelio-ab-testing plugin before 4.5.9 for WordPress has SSRF in ajax/iesupport.php. |
| CVE-2016-10190 | Heap-based buffer overflow in libavformat/http.c in FFmpeg before 2.8.10, 3.0.x before 3.0.5, 3.1.x before 3.1.6, and 3.2.x before 3.2.2 allows remote web servers to execute arbitrary code via a negative chunk size in an HTTP response. |
| CVE-2016-0457 | Unspecified vulnerability in the Application Mgmt Pack for E-Business Suite component in Oracle E-Business Suite 12.1 and 12.2 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality via vectors related to REST Framework, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-0456. NOTE: the previous information is from the January 2016 CPU. Oracle has not commented on third-party claims that this issue is an XML External Entity (XXE) vulnerability, which allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files, cause a denial of service, conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks, or conduct SMB Relay attacks via a crafted DTD in an XML request to OA_HTML/lcmServiceController.jsp. |
| CVE-2016-0456 | Unspecified vulnerability in the Application Mgmt Pack for E-Business Suite component in Oracle E-Business Suite 12.1 and 12.2 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality via vectors related to REST Framework, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-0457. NOTE: the previous information is from the January 2016 CPU. Oracle has not commented on third-party claims that this issue is an XML External Entity (XXE) vulnerability, which allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files, cause a denial of service, conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks, or conduct SMB Relay attacks via a crafted DTD in an XML request to OA_HTML/copxmllcmservicecontroller.js. |
| CVE-2016-0362 | IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 3.3 before 3.3.2.6, 3.4 before 3.4.2.4, and 3.5 before 3.5.0.2 allows remote authenticated users to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks, and trigger network traffic to arbitrary intranet or Internet hosts, via a crafted proxy request to a web service. |
| CVE-2015-8813 | The Page_Load function in Umbraco.Web/umbraco.presentation/umbraco/dashboard/FeedProxy.aspx.cs in Umbraco before 7.4.0 allows remote attackers to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via the url parameter. |
| CVE-2015-7816 | The DisplayTopKeywords function in plugins/Referrers/Controller.php in Piwik before 2.15.0 allows remote attackers to conduct PHP object injection attacks, conduct Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attacks, and execute arbitrary PHP code via a crafted HTTP header. |
| CVE-2015-7570 | Multiple server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerabilities in Yeager CMS 1.2.1 allow remote attackers to trigger outbound requests and enumerate open ports via the dbhost parameter to libs/org/adodb_lite/tests/test_adodb_lite.php, libs/org/adodb_lite/tests/test_datadictionary.php, or libs/org/adodb_lite/tests/test_adodb_lite_sessions.php. |
| CVE-2015-6463 | CodeWrights HART Comm DTM components, as used with Endress+Hauser FieldCare, allow remote attackers to read arbitrary files, send HTTP requests to intranet servers, or cause a denial of service (CPU and memory consumption) via a longtag XML schema containing an external entity declaration in conjunction with an entity reference, related to an XML External Entity (XXE) issue. |
| CVE-2015-6388 | Cisco Unified Computing System (UCS) Central software 1.3(0.1) allows remote attackers to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via a crafted request, aka Bug ID CSCux33575. |
| CVE-2015-5255 | Adobe BlazeDS, as used in ColdFusion 10 before Update 18 and 11 before Update 7 and LiveCycle Data Services 3.0.x before 3.0.0.354175, 3.1.x before 3.1.0.354180, 4.5.x before 4.5.1.354177, 4.6.2.x before 4.6.2.354178, and 4.7.x before 4.7.0.354178, allows remote attackers to send HTTP traffic to intranet servers via a crafted XML document, related to a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) issue. |
| CVE-2015-3623 | XML external entity (XXE) vulnerability in QlikTech Qlikview before 11.20 SR12 allows remote attackers to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks and read arbitrary files via crafted XML data in a request to AccessPoint.aspx. |
| CVE-2015-1818 | XML external entity (XXE) vulnerability in the dashbuilder import facility (DocumentBuilders in org.jboss.dashboard.export.ImportManagerImpl) in Red Hat JBoss BPM Suite before 6.1.2 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files, conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks, and have other unspecified impact via a crafted XML document. |
| CVE-2015-1775 | Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the proxy endpoint (api/v1/proxy) in Apache Ambari before 2.1.0 allows remote authenticated users to conduct port scans and access unsecured services via a crafted REST call. |
| CVE-2015-1764 | The web applications in Microsoft Exchange Server 2013 SP1 and Cumulative Update 8 allow remote attackers to bypass the Same Origin Policy and send HTTP traffic to intranet servers via a crafted request, related to a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) issue, aka "Exchange Server-Side Request Forgery Vulnerability." |
| CVE-2014-9304 | Plex Media Server before 0.9.9.3 allows remote attackers to bypass the web server whitelist, conduct SSRF attacks, and execute arbitrary administrative actions via multiple crafted X-Plex-Url headers to system/proxy, which are inconsistently processed by the request handler in the backend web server. |
| CVE-2014-9302 | Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the cmisbrowser servlet in Content Management Interoperability Service (CMIS) in Alfresco Community Edition 5.0.a and earlier allows remote attackers to trigger outbound requests via a crafted URI in the url parameter. |
| CVE-2014-9301 | Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the proxy servlet in Alfresco Community Edition before 5.0.a allows remote attackers to trigger outbound requests to intranet servers, conduct port scans, and read arbitrary files via a crafted URI in the endpoint parameter. |
| CVE-2014-9300 | Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the cmisbrowser servlet in Content Management Interoperability Service (CMIS) in Alfresco Community Edition before 5.0.a allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that access unauthorized URLs and obtain user credentials via a URL in the url parameter. |
| CVE-2014-9292 | Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in proxy.php in the jRSS Widget plugin 1.2 and earlier for WordPress allows remote attackers to trigger outbound requests and enumerate open ports via the url parameter. |
| CVE-2014-9181 | Multiple directory traversal vulnerabilities in Plex Media Server before 0.9.9.3 allow remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a .. (dot dot) in the URI to (1) manage/ or (2) web/ or remote authenticated users to read arbitrary files via a .. (dot dot) in the URI to resources/. |
| CVE-2014-9038 | wp-includes/http.php in WordPress before 3.7.5, 3.8.x before 3.8.5, 3.9.x before 3.9.3, and 4.x before 4.0.1 allows remote attackers to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks by referring to a 127.0.0.0/8 resource. |
| CVE-2014-8943 | Lexiglot through 2014-11-20 allows SSRF via the admin.php?page=projects svn_url parameter. |
| CVE-2014-8749 | Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in admin/htaccess/bpsunlock.php in the BulletProof Security plugin before .51.1 for WordPress allows remote attackers to trigger outbound requests that authenticate to arbitrary databases via the dbhost parameter. |
| CVE-2014-6577 | Unspecified vulnerability in the XML Developer's Kit for C component in Oracle Database Server 11.2.0.3, 11.2.0.4, 12.1.0.1, and 12.1.0.2 allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality via unknown vectors. NOTE: the previous information is from the January 2015 CPU. Oracle has not commented on the original researcher's claim that this is an XML external entity (XXE) vulnerability in the XML parser, which allows attackers to conduct internal port scanning, perform SSRF attacks, or cause a denial of service via a crafted (1) http: or (2) ftp: URI. |
| CVE-2014-5297 | The actionSendErrorReport method in protected/controllers/SiteController.php in X2Engine 2.8 through 4.1.7 allows remote attackers to conduct PHP object injection and Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attacks via crafted serialized data in the report parameter. |
| CVE-2014-5237 | Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the documentconverter component in Open-Xchange (OX) AppSuite before 7.4.2-rev10 and 7.6.x before 7.6.0-rev10 allows remote attackers to trigger requests to arbitrary servers and embed arbitrary images via a URL in an embedded image in a Text document, which is not properly handled by the image preview. |
| CVE-2014-3990 | The Cart::getProducts method in system/library/cart.php in OpenCart 1.5.6.4 and earlier allows remote attackers to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks or possibly conduct XML External Entity (XXE) attacks and execute arbitrary code via a crafted serialized PHP object, related to the quantity parameter in an update request. |
| CVE-2014-2233 | Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the MapAPI in Infoware MapSuite before 1.0.36 and 1.1.x before 1.1.49 allows remote attackers to trigger requests to intranet servers via unspecified vectors. |
| CVE-2013-6919 | The default configuration of phpThumb before 1.7.12 has a false value for the disable_debug option, which allows remote attackers to conduct Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attacks via the src parameter. |
| CVE-2013-4864 | MiCasaVerde VeraLite with firmware 1.5.408 allows remote attackers to send HTTP requests to intranet servers via the url parameter to cgi-bin/cmh/proxy.sh, related to a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) issue. |
| CVE-2013-2199 | The HTTP API in WordPress before 3.5.2 allows remote attackers to send HTTP requests to intranet servers via unspecified vectors, related to a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) issue, a similar vulnerability to CVE-2013-0235. |
| CVE-2013-1648 | The Subscriptions feature in Open-Xchange Server before 6.20.7 rev14, 6.22.0 before rev13, and 6.22.1 before rev14 does not properly validate the publication-source URL, which allows remote authenticated users to trigger arbitrary outbound TCP traffic via a crafted Source field, as demonstrated by (1) an ftp: URL, (2) a gopher: URL, or (3) an http://127.0.0.1/ URL, related to a "Server-side request forging (SSRF)" issue. |
| CVE-2013-0235 | The XMLRPC API in WordPress before 3.5.1 allows remote attackers to send HTTP requests to intranet servers, and conduct port-scanning attacks, by specifying a crafted source URL for a pingback, related to a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) issue. |
| CVE-2007-6758 | Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in feed-proxy.php in extjs 5.0.0. |
|
You can also search by reference using the CVE Reference Maps.
For More Information: CVE Request Web Form (select “Other” from dropdown)
|
||
