|
|
Search Results
There are 56 CVE Records that match your search.
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| CVE-2024-8004 | A stored Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability affecting ENOVIA Collaborative Industry Innovator from Release 3DEXPERIENCE R2022x through Release 3DEXPERIENCE R2024x allows an attacker to execute arbitrary script code in user's browser session. |
| CVE-2024-7736 | A reflected Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability affecting ENOVIA Collaborative Industry Innovator from Release 3DEXPERIENCE R2022x through Release 3DEXPERIENCE R2024x allows an attacker to execute arbitrary script code in user's browser session. |
| CVE-2024-6380 | A reflected Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability affecting ENOVIA Collaborative Industry Innovator from Release 3DEXPERIENCE R2022x through Release 3DEXPERIENCE R2024x allows an attacker to execute arbitrary script code in user's browser session. |
| CVE-2024-6378 | A reflected Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability affecting ENOVIA Collaborative Industry Innovator from Release 3DEXPERIENCE R2022x through Release 3DEXPERIENCE R2024x allows an attacker to execute arbitrary script code in user's browser session. |
| CVE-2024-48441 | Wuhan Tianyu Information Industry Co., Ltd Tianyu CPE Router CommonCPExCPETS_v3.2.468.11.04_P4 was discovered to contain a command injection vulnerability via the component at_command.asp. |
| CVE-2024-45310 | runc is a CLI tool for spawning and running containers according to the OCI specification. runc 1.1.13 and earlier, as well as 1.2.0-rc2 and earlier, can be tricked into creating empty files or directories in arbitrary locations in the host filesystem by sharing a volume between two containers and exploiting a race with `os.MkdirAll`. While this could be used to create empty files, existing files would not be truncated. An attacker must have the ability to start containers using some kind of custom volume configuration. Containers using user namespaces are still affected, but the scope of places an attacker can create inodes can be significantly reduced. Sufficiently strict LSM policies (SELinux/Apparmor) can also in principle block this attack -- we suspect the industry standard SELinux policy may restrict this attack's scope but the exact scope of protection hasn't been analysed. This is exploitable using runc directly as well as through Docker and Kubernetes. The issue is fixed in runc v1.1.14 and v1.2.0-rc3. Some workarounds are available. Using user namespaces restricts this attack fairly significantly such that the attacker can only create inodes in directories that the remapped root user/group has write access to. Unless the root user is remapped to an actual user on the host (such as with rootless containers that don't use `/etc/sub[ug]id`), this in practice means that an attacker would only be able to create inodes in world-writable directories. A strict enough SELinux or AppArmor policy could in principle also restrict the scope if a specific label is applied to the runc runtime, though neither the extent to which the standard existing policies block this attack nor what exact policies are needed to sufficiently restrict this attack have been thoroughly tested. |
| CVE-2024-33948 | Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Pixel Industry TweetScroll Widget allows Stored XSS.This issue affects TweetScroll Widget: from n/a through 1.3.7. |
| CVE-2024-23332 | The Notary Project is a set of specifications and tools intended to provide a cross-industry standard for securing software supply chains by using authentic container images and other OCI artifacts. An external actor with control of a compromised container registry can provide outdated versions of OCI artifacts, such as Images. This could lead artifact consumers with relaxed trust policies (such as `permissive` instead of `strict`) to potentially use artifacts with signatures that are no longer valid, making them susceptible to any exploits those artifacts may contain. In Notary Project, an artifact publisher can control the validity period of artifact by specifying signature expiry during the signing process. Using shorter signature validity periods along with processes to periodically resign artifacts, allows artifact producers to ensure that their consumers will only receive up-to-date artifacts. Artifact consumers should correspondingly use a `strict` or equivalent trust policy that enforces signature expiry. Together these steps enable use of up-to-date artifacts and safeguard against rollback attack in the event of registry compromise. The Notary Project offers various signature validation options such as `permissive`, `audit` and `skip` to support various scenarios. These scenarios includes 1) situations demanding urgent workload deployment, necessitating the bypassing of expired or revoked signatures; 2) auditing of artifacts lacking signatures without interrupting workload; and 3) skipping of verification for specific images that might have undergone validation through alternative mechanisms. Additionally, the Notary Project supports revocation to ensure the signature freshness. Artifact publishers can sign with short-lived certificates and revoke older certificates when necessary. This revocation serves as a signal to inform artifact consumers that the corresponding unexpired artifact is no longer approved by the publisher. This enables the artifact publisher to control the validity of the signature independently of their ability to manage artifacts in a compromised registry. |
| CVE-2023-46233 | crypto-js is a JavaScript library of crypto standards. Prior to version 4.2.0, crypto-js PBKDF2 is 1,000 times weaker than originally specified in 1993, and at least 1,300,000 times weaker than current industry standard. This is because it both defaults to SHA1, a cryptographic hash algorithm considered insecure since at least 2005, and defaults to one single iteration, a 'strength' or 'difficulty' value specified at 1,000 when specified in 1993. PBKDF2 relies on iteration count as a countermeasure to preimage and collision attacks. If used to protect passwords, the impact is high. If used to generate signatures, the impact is high. Version 4.2.0 contains a patch for this issue. As a workaround, configure crypto-js to use SHA256 with at least 250,000 iterations. |
| CVE-2023-46133 | CryptoES is a cryptography algorithms library compatible with ES6 and TypeScript. Prior to version 2.1.0, CryptoES PBKDF2 is 1,000 times weaker than originally specified in 1993, and at least 1,300,000 times weaker than current industry standard. This is because it both defaults to SHA1, a cryptographic hash algorithm considered insecure since at least 2005, and defaults to one single iteration, a 'strength' or 'difficulty' value specified at 1,000 when specified in 1993. PBKDF2 relies on iteration count as a countermeasure to preimage and collision attacks. If used to protect passwords, the impact is high. If used to generate signatures, the impact is high. Version 2.1.0 contains a patch for this issue. As a workaround, configure CryptoES to use SHA256 with at least 250,000 iterations. |
| CVE-2021-44345 | Beijing Wisdom Vision Technology Industry Co., Ltd One Card Integrated Management System 3.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection. |
| CVE-2021-21334 | In containerd (an industry-standard container runtime) before versions 1.3.10 and 1.4.4, containers launched through containerd's CRI implementation (through Kubernetes, crictl, or any other pod/container client that uses the containerd CRI service) that share the same image may receive incorrect environment variables, including values that are defined for other containers. If the affected containers have different security contexts, this may allow sensitive information to be unintentionally shared. If you are not using containerd's CRI implementation (through one of the mechanisms described above), you are not vulnerable to this issue. If you are not launching multiple containers or Kubernetes pods from the same image which have different environment variables, you are not vulnerable to this issue. If you are not launching multiple containers or Kubernetes pods from the same image in rapid succession, you have reduced likelihood of being vulnerable to this issue This vulnerability has been fixed in containerd 1.3.10 and containerd 1.4.4. Users should update to these versions. |
| CVE-2020-25249 | An issue was discovered in Hyland OnBase 16.0.2.83 and below, 17.0.2.109 and below, 18.0.0.37 and below, 19.8.16.1000 and below and 20.3.10.1000 and below. The server typically logs activity only when a client application specifies that logging is desired. This can be problematic for use cases in a regulated industry, where server-side logging is required in additional situations. |
| CVE-2020-15257 | containerd is an industry-standard container runtime and is available as a daemon for Linux and Windows. In containerd before versions 1.3.9 and 1.4.3, the containerd-shim API is improperly exposed to host network containers. Access controls for the shim’s API socket verified that the connecting process had an effective UID of 0, but did not otherwise restrict access to the abstract Unix domain socket. This would allow malicious containers running in the same network namespace as the shim, with an effective UID of 0 but otherwise reduced privileges, to cause new processes to be run with elevated privileges. This vulnerability has been fixed in containerd 1.3.9 and 1.4.3. Users should update to these versions as soon as they are released. It should be noted that containers started with an old version of containerd-shim should be stopped and restarted, as running containers will continue to be vulnerable even after an upgrade. If you are not providing the ability for untrusted users to start containers in the same network namespace as the shim (typically the "host" network namespace, for example with docker run --net=host or hostNetwork: true in a Kubernetes pod) and run with an effective UID of 0, you are not vulnerable to this issue. If you are running containers with a vulnerable configuration, you can deny access to all abstract sockets with AppArmor by adding a line similar to deny unix addr=@**, to your policy. It is best practice to run containers with a reduced set of privileges, with a non-zero UID, and with isolated namespaces. The containerd maintainers strongly advise against sharing namespaces with the host. Reducing the set of isolation mechanisms used for a container necessarily increases that container's privilege, regardless of what container runtime is used for running that container. |
| CVE-2020-15157 | In containerd (an industry-standard container runtime) before version 1.2.14 there is a credential leaking vulnerability. If a container image manifest in the OCI Image format or Docker Image V2 Schema 2 format includes a URL for the location of a specific image layer (otherwise known as a “foreign layer”), the default containerd resolver will follow that URL to attempt to download it. In v1.2.x but not 1.3.0 or later, the default containerd resolver will provide its authentication credentials if the server where the URL is located presents an HTTP 401 status code along with registry-specific HTTP headers. If an attacker publishes a public image with a manifest that directs one of the layers to be fetched from a web server they control and they trick a user or system into pulling the image, they can obtain the credentials used for pulling that image. In some cases, this may be the user's username and password for the registry. In other cases, this may be the credentials attached to the cloud virtual instance which can grant access to other cloud resources in the account. The default containerd resolver is used by the cri-containerd plugin (which can be used by Kubernetes), the ctr development tool, and other client programs that have explicitly linked against it. This vulnerability has been fixed in containerd 1.2.14. containerd 1.3 and later are not affected. If you are using containerd 1.3 or later, you are not affected. If you are using cri-containerd in the 1.2 series or prior, you should ensure you only pull images from trusted sources. Other container runtimes built on top of containerd but not using the default resolver (such as Docker) are not affected. |
| CVE-2020-13799 | Western Digital has identified a security vulnerability in the Replay Protected Memory Block (RPMB) protocol as specified in multiple standards for storage device interfaces, including all versions of eMMC, UFS, and NVMe. The RPMB protocol is specified by industry standards bodies and is implemented by storage devices from multiple vendors to assist host systems in securing trusted firmware. Several scenarios have been identified in which the RPMB state may be affected by an attacker without the knowledge of the trusted component that uses the RPMB feature. |
| CVE-2020-12912 | A potential vulnerability in the AMD extension to Linux "hwmon" service may allow an attacker to use the Linux-based Running Average Power Limit (RAPL) interface to show various side channel attacks. In line with industry partners, AMD has updated the RAPL interface to require privileged access. |
| CVE-2020-10291 | Visual Components (owned by KUKA) is a robotic simulator that allows simulating factories and robots in order toimprove planning and decision-making processes. Visual Components software requires a special license which can beobtained from a network license server. The network license server binds to all interfaces (0.0.0.0) and listensfor packets over UDP port 5093. No authentication/authorization is required in order to communicate with theserver. The protocol being used is a property protocol by RMS Sentinel which provides the licensing infrastructurefor the network license server. RMS Sentinel license manager service exposes UDP port 5093 which provides sensitivesystem information that could be leveraged for further exploitation without any kind of authentication. Thisinformation includes detailed hardware and OS characteristics.After a decryption process, a textual protocol is found which contains a simple header with the requested command,application-identifier, and some arguments. The protocol leaks information regarding the receiving serverinformation, license information and managing licenses, among others.Through this flaw, attackers can retreive information about a KUKA simulation system, particularly, the version ofthe licensing server, which is connected to the simulator, and which will allow them to launch local simulationswith similar characteristics, further understanding the dynamics of motion virtualization and opening doors toother attacks (see RVDP#711 and RVDP#712 for subsequent vulnerabilities that compromise integrity andavailability).Beyond compromising simulations, Visual Components provides capabilities to interface with industrial machinery.Particularly, their PLC Connectivity feature 'makes it easy' to connect simulations with control systems usingeither the industry standard OPC UA or other supported vendor specific interfaces. This fills the gap of jumpingfrom simulation to real and enables attackers to pivot from the Visual Components simulator to robots or otherIndustrial Control System (ICS) devices, such as PLCs. |
| CVE-2019-18913 | A potential security vulnerability with pre-boot DMA may allow unauthorized UEFI code execution using open-case attacks. This industry-wide issue requires physically accessing internal expansion slots with specialized hardware and software tools to modify UEFI code in memory. This affects HP Intel-based Business PCs that support Microsoft Windows 10 Kernel DMA protection. Affected versions depend on platform (prior to 01.04.02; or prior to 02.04.01; or prior to 02.04.02). |
| CVE-2018-7469 | PHP Scripts Mall Entrepreneur Job Portal Script 2.0.9 has XSS via the p_name (aka Edit Category Name) field to admin/categories_industry.php (aka Categories - Industry Type). |
| CVE-2017-3752 | An industry-wide vulnerability has been identified in the implementation of the Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) routing protocol used on some Lenovo switches. Exploitation of these implementation flaws may result in attackers being able to erase or alter the routing tables of one or many routers, switches, or other devices that support OSPF within a routing domain. |
| CVE-2015-4795 | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Utilities Work and Asset Management component in Oracle Industry Applications 1.9.1.1.2 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors related to Add-On Applications. |
| CVE-2015-0107 | IBM Tivoli IT Asset Management for IT, Tivoli Service Request Manager, and Change and Configuration Management Database 7.1 through 7.1.1.8 and 7.2 and Maximo Asset Management and Maximo Industry Solutions 7.1 through 7.1.1.8, 7.5 before 7.5.0.7 IFIX003, and 7.6 before 7.6.0.0 IFIX002 allow remote authenticated users to conduct directory traversal attacks via unspecified vectors. |
| CVE-2015-0104 | IBM Tivoli IT Asset Management for IT, Tivoli Service Request Manager, and Change and Configuration Management Database 7.1 through 7.1.1.8 and 7.2 and Maximo Asset Management and Maximo Industry Solutions 7.1 through 7.1.1.8, 7.5 before 7.5.0.7 IFIX003, and 7.6 before 7.6.0.0 IFIX002 allow remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors. |
| CVE-2014-5560 | The Popscene (Music Industry Sim) (aka air.Popscene) application 1.04 for Android does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate. |
| CVE-2014-1965 | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in ISpeakAdapter in the Integration Repository in the SAP Exchange Infrastructure (BC-XI) component 3.0, 7.00 through 7.02, and 7.10 through 7.11 for SAP NetWeaver allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via vectors related to PIP. |
| CVE-2013-5857 | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Health Sciences InForm component in Oracle Industry Applications 4.5 SP3, 4.5 SP3a-k, 4.6 SP0, 4.6 SP0a-c, 4.6 SP1, 4.6 SP1a-c, 4.6 SP2, 4.6 SP2a-c, 5.0 SP0, 5.0 SP0a, 5.0 SP1, and 5.0 SP1a-b allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality and integrity via unknown vectors related to Web. |
| CVE-2013-5856 | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Health Sciences InForm component in Oracle Industry Applications 4.5 SP3, 4.5 SP3a-k, 4.6 SP0, 4.6 SP0a-c, 4.6 SP1, 4.6 SP1a-c, 4.6 SP2, 4.6 SP2a-c, 5.0 SP0, 5.0 SP0a, 5.0 SP1, 5.0 SP1a-b, 5.5 SP0, 5.5 SP0b, 5.5.1, and 6.0.0 allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality and integrity via unknown vectors related to Web. |
| CVE-2013-5837 | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Health Sciences InForm component in Oracle Industry Applications 4.6 SP0, 4.6 SP0a-c, 4.6 SP1, 4.6 SP1a-c, 4.6 SP2, 4.6 SP2a-c, 5.0 SP0, 5.0 SP0a, 5.0 SP1, 5.0 SP1a-b, 5.0.3, and 5.0.4 allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality via unknown vectors related to Cognos. |
| CVE-2013-5811 | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Health Sciences InForm component in Oracle Industry Applications 4.5 SP3, 4.5 SP3a-k, 4.6 SP0, 4.6 SP0a-c, 4.6 SP1, 4.6 SP1a-c, 4.6 SP2, 4.6 SP2a-c, 5.0 SP0, 5.0 SP0a, 5.0 SP1, and 5.0 SP1a-b allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality via unknown vectors related to Web. |
| CVE-2013-5762 | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Siebel CTMS component in Oracle Industry Applications 8.1.1.x allows local users to affect confidentiality and availability via unknown vectors related to SC-OC Integration. |
| CVE-2013-3816 | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Policy Automation component in Oracle Industry Applications 10.2.0, 10.3.0, 10.3.1, 10.4.0, 10.4.1, and 10.4.2 allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality via unknown vectors related to Determinations Engine. |
| CVE-2013-3814 | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Retail Invoice Matching component in Oracle Industry Applications 10.2, 11.0, 12.0, 12.0IN, 12.1, 13.0, 13.1, and 13.2 allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality and integrity via unknown vectors related to System Administration. |
| CVE-2013-3061 | The ISHMED-PATRED_TRANSACT_RFCCALL function in the IS-H Industry-Specific Component Hospital subsystem in SAP Healthcare Industry Solution, and the SAP ERP central component (aka ECC 6), allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended transaction restrictions via unspecified vectors. |
| CVE-2013-2397 | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Retail Central Office component in Oracle Industry Applications 13.1, 13.2, 13.3, and 13.4 allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality and integrity via unknown vectors related to Customer Operations (Add, Search). |
| CVE-2013-1525 | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Retail Integration Bus component in Oracle Industry Applications 13.0, 13.1, and 13.2 allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality via unknown vectors related to Retail Integration Bus Manager. |
| CVE-2013-1520 | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Clinical Remote Data Capture Option component in Oracle Industry Applications 4.6.0 and 4.6.6 allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality and integrity via vectors related to HTML Surround. |
| CVE-2012-5066 | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Central Designer component in Oracle Industry Applications 1.3, 1.4, and 1.4.2 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors. |
| CVE-2012-1763 | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Clinical/Remote Data Capture component in Oracle Industry Applications 4.6.0 and 4.6.2 allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality, related to HTML Surround. |
| CVE-2012-1743 | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Clinical Remote Data Capture Option component in Oracle Industry Applications 4.6.0.x, 4.6.2, and 4.6.3 allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality, related to HTML Surround. |
| CVE-2012-1674 | Unspecified vulnerability in the Siebel Clinical component in Oracle Industry Applications 7.7, 7.8, 8.0.0.x, 8.1.1.x, and 8.2.2.x allows remote authenticated users to affect integrity via unknown vectors related to Web UI, a different vulnerability than CVE-2012-0582. |
| CVE-2012-0582 | Unspecified vulnerability in the Siebel Clinical component in Oracle Industry Applications 7.7, 7.8, 8.0.0.x, 8.1.1.x, and 8.2.2.x allows remote authenticated users to affect integrity via unknown vectors related to Web UI, a different vulnerability than CVE-2012-1674. |
| CVE-2011-3538 | Unspecified vulnerability in the Sun Ray component in Oracle Virtualization 4.0 allows remote attackers to affect integrity, related to Authentication. NOTE: this identifier was inadvertently used for an Oracle Industry Applications issue involving TMS Help, but that issue has been assigned CVE-2011-2323. |
| CVE-2011-2323 | Unspecified vulnerability in the Health Sciences - Oracle Thesaurus Management System component in Oracle Industry Applications 4.6.1 and 4.6.2 allows remote attackers to affect integrity, related to TMS Help. |
| CVE-2011-2309 | Unspecified vulnerability in the Health Sciences - Oracle Clinical, Remote Data Capture component in Oracle Industry Applications 4.6 and 4.6.2 allows remote attackers to affect integrity, related to RDC Help. |
| CVE-2011-0855 | Unspecified vulnerability in the InForm component in Oracle Industry Applications 4.5, 4.6, and 5.0 allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality and integrity via unknown vectors related to Core. |
| CVE-2010-3593 | Unspecified vulnerability in the Health Sciences - Oracle Argus Safety component in Oracle Industry Applications 5.0, 5.0.1, 5.0.2, and 5.0.3 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors related to Login and LDAP. |
| CVE-2010-0876 | Unspecified vulnerability in the Life Sciences - Oracle Clinical Remote Data Capture Option component in Oracle Industry Product Suite 4.5.3 and 4.6 allows remote attackers to affect integrity, related to RDC Onsite. |
| CVE-2010-0875 | Unspecified vulnerability in the Life Sciences - Oracle Thesaurus Management System component in Oracle Industry Product Suite 4.5.2, 4.6, and 4.6.1 allows remote attackers to affect integrity, related to TMS Browser. |
| CVE-2010-0874 | Unspecified vulnerability in the Communications - Oracle Communications Unified Inventory Management component in Oracle Industry Product Suite 7.1 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors. |
| CVE-2010-0864 | Unspecified vulnerability in the Retail - Oracle Retail Place In-Season component in Oracle Industry Product Suite 12.2 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors related to Online Help. |
| CVE-2010-0863 | Unspecified vulnerability in the Retail - Oracle Retail Plan In-Season component in Oracle Industry Product Suite 12.2 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors related to Online Help. |
| CVE-2010-0862 | Unspecified vulnerability in the Retail - Oracle Retail Markdown Optimization component in Oracle Industry Product Suite 13.1 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors related to Online Help. |
| CVE-2009-1998 | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Communications Order and Service Management component in Oracle Industry Applications 2.8.0, 6.2.0, 6.3.0, and 6.3.1 allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality and integrity via unknown vectors. |
| CVE-2008-3045 | Unspecified vulnerability in the Industry Database (aka Branchendatenbank pro_industrydb) extension 1.0.0 and earlier for TYPO3 has unknown impact and attack vectors related to "Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity." |
| CVE-2008-1404 | SQL injection vulnerability in index.php in the Viso (Industry Book) 2.04 and 2.03 module for eXV2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the kid parameter. |
|
You can also search by reference using the CVE Reference Maps.
For More Information: CVE Request Web Form (select “Other” from dropdown)
|
||
