Search Results
There are 127 CVE Records that match your search.
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| CVE-2024-29055 | Microsoft Defender for IoT Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability |
| CVE-2024-29054 | Microsoft Defender for IoT Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability |
| CVE-2024-29053 | Microsoft Defender for IoT Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| CVE-2024-27261 | IBM Storage Defender - Resiliency Service 2.0.0 through 2.0.2 could allow a privileged user to install a potentially dangerous tar file, which could give them access to subsequent systems where the package was installed. IBM X-Force ID: 283986. |
| CVE-2024-26237 | Windows Defender Credential Guard Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability |
| CVE-2024-22313 | IBM Storage Defender - Resiliency Service 2.0 contains hard-coded credentials, such as a password or cryptographic key, which it uses for its own inbound authentication, outbound communication to external components, or encryption of internal data. IBM X-Force ID: 278749. |
| CVE-2024-22312 | IBM Storage Defender - Resiliency Service 2.0 stores user credentials in plain clear text which can be read by a local user. IBM X-Force ID: 278748. |
| CVE-2024-21324 | Microsoft Defender for IoT Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability |
| CVE-2024-21323 | Microsoft Defender for IoT Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| CVE-2024-21322 | Microsoft Defender for IoT Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| CVE-2024-21315 | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Protection Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability |
| CVE-2024-20671 | Microsoft Defender Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability |
| CVE-2023-51490 | Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability in WPMU DEV Defender Security – Malware Scanner, Login Security & Firewall.This issue affects Defender Security – Malware Scanner, Login Security & Firewall: from n/a through 4.1.0. |
| CVE-2023-50963 | IBM Storage Defender - Data Protect 1.0.0 through 1.4.1 is vulnerable to HTTP header injection, caused by improper validation of input by the HOST headers. This could allow an attacker to conduct various attacks against the vulnerable system, including cross-site scripting, cache poisoning or session hijacking. IBM X-Force ID: 276101. |
| CVE-2023-50957 | IBM Storage Defender - Resiliency Service 2.0 could allow a privileged user to perform unauthorized actions after obtaining encrypted data from clear text key storage. IBM X-Force ID: 275783. |
| CVE-2023-5089 | The Defender Security WordPress plugin before 4.1.0 does not prevent redirects to the login page via the auth_redirect WordPress function, allowing an unauthenticated visitor to access the login page, even when the hide login page functionality of the plugin is enabled. |
| CVE-2023-38175 | Microsoft Windows Defender Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability |
| CVE-2023-38163 | Windows Defender Attack Surface Reduction Security Feature Bypass |
| CVE-2023-36422 | Microsoft Windows Defender Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability |
| CVE-2023-36010 | Microsoft Defender Denial of Service Vulnerability |
| CVE-2023-33156 | Microsoft Defender Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability |
| CVE-2023-24934 | Microsoft Defender Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability |
| CVE-2023-24860 | Microsoft Defender Denial of Service Vulnerability |
| CVE-2023-23389 | Microsoft Defender Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability |
| CVE-2023-23379 | Microsoft Defender for IoT Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability |
| CVE-2023-21809 | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability |
| CVE-2022-37971 | Microsoft Windows Defender Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability |
| CVE-2022-35828 | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint for Mac Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability |
| CVE-2022-35822 | Windows Defender Credential Guard Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability |
| CVE-2022-35771 | Windows Defender Credential Guard Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability |
| CVE-2022-34712 | Windows Defender Credential Guard Information Disclosure Vulnerability |
| CVE-2022-34711 | Windows Defender Credential Guard Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability |
| CVE-2022-34710 | Windows Defender Credential Guard Information Disclosure Vulnerability |
| CVE-2022-34709 | Windows Defender Credential Guard Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability |
| CVE-2022-34705 | Windows Defender Credential Guard Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability |
| CVE-2022-34704 | Windows Defender Credential Guard Information Disclosure Vulnerability |
| CVE-2022-34009 | Fossil 2.18 on Windows allows attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via an XSS payload in a ticket. This occurs because the ticket data is stored in a temporary file, and the product does not properly handle the absence of this file after Windows Defender has flagged it as malware. |
| CVE-2022-33637 | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Tampering Vulnerability |
| CVE-2022-30150 | Windows Defender Remote Credential Guard Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability |
| CVE-2022-24548 | Microsoft Defender Denial of Service Vulnerability |
| CVE-2022-23604 | x26-Cogs is a repository of cogs made by Twentysix for the Red Discord bot. Among these cogs is the Defender cog, a tool for Discord server moderation. A vulnerability in the Defender cog prior to version 1.10.0 allows users with admin privileges to issue commands as other users who share the same server. If a bot owner shares the same server as the attacker, it is possible for the attacker to issue bot-owner restricted commands. The issue has been patched in version 1.10.0. One may unload the Defender cog as a workaround. |
| CVE-2022-23278 | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Spoofing Vulnerability |
| CVE-2022-23266 | Microsoft Defender for IoT Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability |
| CVE-2022-23265 | Microsoft Defender for IoT Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| CVE-2022-21921 | Windows Defender Credential Guard Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability |
| CVE-2022-21906 | Windows Defender Application Control Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability |
| CVE-2021-4425 | The Defender Security plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.4.6. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the verify_otp_login_time() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to verify a one time login via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| CVE-2021-43889 | Microsoft Defender for IoT Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| CVE-2021-43888 | Microsoft Defender for IoT Information Disclosure Vulnerability |
| CVE-2021-43882 | Microsoft Defender for IoT Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| CVE-2021-42315 | Microsoft Defender for IoT Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| CVE-2021-42314 | Microsoft Defender for IoT Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| CVE-2021-42313 | Microsoft Defender for IoT Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| CVE-2021-42312 | Microsoft Defender for IoT Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability |
| CVE-2021-42311 | Microsoft Defender for IoT Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| CVE-2021-42310 | Microsoft Defender for IoT Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| CVE-2021-42298 | Microsoft Defender Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| CVE-2021-41365 | Microsoft Defender for IoT Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| CVE-2021-40444 | <p>Microsoft is investigating reports of a remote code execution vulnerability in MSHTML that affects Microsoft Windows. Microsoft is aware of targeted attacks that attempt to exploit this vulnerability by using specially-crafted Microsoft Office documents.</p> <p>An attacker could craft a malicious ActiveX control to be used by a Microsoft Office document that hosts the browser rendering engine. The attacker would then have to convince the user to open the malicious document. Users whose accounts are configured to have fewer user rights on the system could be less impacted than users who operate with administrative user rights.</p> <p>Microsoft Defender Antivirus and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint both provide detection and protections for the known vulnerability. Customers should keep antimalware products up to date. Customers who utilize automatic updates do not need to take additional action. Enterprise customers who manage updates should select the detection build 1.349.22.0 or newer and deploy it across their environments. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint alerts will be displayed as: “Suspicious Cpl File Execution”.</p> <p>Upon completion of this investigation, Microsoft will take the appropriate action to help protect our customers. This may include providing a security update through our monthly release process or providing an out-of-cycle security update, depending on customer needs.</p> <p>Please see the <strong>Mitigations</strong> and <strong>Workaround</strong> sections for important information about steps you can take to protect your system from this vulnerability.</p> <p><strong>UPDATE</strong> September 14, 2021: Microsoft has released security updates to address this vulnerability. Please see the Security Updates table for the applicable update for your system. We recommend that you install these updates immediately. Please see the FAQ for important information about which updates are applicable to your system.</p> |
| CVE-2021-34522 | Microsoft Defender Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| CVE-2021-34471 | Microsoft Windows Defender Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability |
| CVE-2021-34464 | Microsoft Defender Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| CVE-2021-31985 | Microsoft Defender Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| CVE-2021-31978 | Microsoft Defender Denial of Service Vulnerability |
| CVE-2021-24092 | Microsoft Defender Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability |
| CVE-2021-1647 | Microsoft Defender Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| CVE-2020-7337 | Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource vulnerability in McAfee VirusScan Enterprise (VSE) prior to 8.8 Patch 16 allows local administrators to bypass local security protection through VSE not correctly integrating with Windows Defender Application Control via careful manipulation of the Code Integrity checks. |
| CVE-2020-17090 | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability |
| CVE-2020-16886 | <p>A security feature bypass vulnerability exists in the PowerShellGet V2 module. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could bypass WDAC (Windows Defender Application Control) policy and execute arbitrary code on a policy locked-down machine.</p> <p>An attacker must have administrator privileges to create a configuration that includes installing PowerShellGet V2 module onto a machine from the PowerShell Gallery. The WDAC policy must be configured to allow the module to run. After this is done, PowerShell script can be injected and run fully trusted, allowing the attacker arbitrary code execution on the machine.</p> <p>The update addresses the vulnerability by changing how URLs are processed.</p> |
| CVE-2020-1461 | An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the MpSigStub.exe for Defender allows file deletion in arbitrary locations.To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker would first have to log on to the system, aka 'Microsoft Defender Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. |
| CVE-2020-14031 | An issue was discovered in Ozeki NG SMS Gateway through 4.17.6. The outbox functionality of the TXT File module can be used to delete all/most files in a folder. Because the product usually runs as NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM, the only files that will not be deleted are those currently being run by the system and/or files that have special security attributes (e.g., Windows Defender files). |
| CVE-2020-1170 | An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows Defender that leads arbitrary file deletion on the system.To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker would first have to log on to the system, aka 'Microsoft Windows Defender Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1163. |
| CVE-2020-1163 | An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows Defender that leads arbitrary file deletion on the system.To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker would first have to log on to the system, aka 'Microsoft Windows Defender Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1170. |
| CVE-2020-1002 | An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the MpSigStub.exe for Defender allows file deletion in arbitrary locations.To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker would first have to log on to the system, aka 'Microsoft Defender Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. |
| CVE-2020-0951 | <p>A security feature bypass vulnerability exists in Windows Defender Application Control (WDAC) which could allow an attacker to bypass WDAC enforcement. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could execute PowerShell commands that would be blocked by WDAC.</p> <p>To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker need administrator access on a local machine where PowerShell is running. The attacker could then connect to a PowerShell session and send commands to execute arbitrary code.</p> <p>The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how PowerShell commands are validated when WDAC protection is enabled.</p> |
| CVE-2020-0835 | An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when Windows Defender antimalware platform improperly handles hard links, aka 'Windows Defender Antimalware Platform Hard Link Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. |
| CVE-2020-0763 | An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when Windows Defender Security Center handles certain objects in memory.To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker would first have to log on to the system, aka 'Windows Defender Security Center Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-0762. |
| CVE-2020-0762 | An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when Windows Defender Security Center handles certain objects in memory.To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker would first have to log on to the system, aka 'Windows Defender Security Center Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-0763. |
| CVE-2019-1488 | A security feature bypass vulnerability exists when Microsoft Defender improperly handles specific buffers, aka 'Microsoft Defender Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability'. |
| CVE-2019-13496 | One Identity Cloud Access Manager before 8.1.4 Hotfix 1 allows OTP bypass via vectors involving a man in the middle, the One Identity Defender product, and replacing a failed SAML response with a successful SAML response. |
| CVE-2019-1255 | A denial of service vulnerability exists when Microsoft Defender improperly handles files, aka 'Microsoft Defender Denial of Service Vulnerability'. |
| CVE-2019-1167 | A security feature bypass vulnerability exists in Windows Defender Application Control (WDAC) which could allow an attacker to bypass WDAC enforcement, aka 'Windows Defender Application Control Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability'. |
| CVE-2019-1161 | An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the MpSigStub.exe for Defender allows file deletion in arbitrary locations.To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker would first have to log on to the system, aka 'Microsoft Defender Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. |
| CVE-2019-0733 | A security feature bypass vulnerability exists in Windows Defender Application Control (WDAC) which could allow an attacker to bypass WDAC enforcement, aka 'Windows Defender Application Control Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability'. |
| CVE-2019-0637 | A security feature bypass vulnerability exists when Windows Defender Firewall incorrectly applies firewall profiles to cellular network connections, aka 'Windows Defender Firewall Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability'. |
| CVE-2018-5174 | In the Windows 10 April 2018 Update, Windows Defender SmartScreen honors the "SEE_MASK_FLAG_NO_UI" flag associated with downloaded files and will not show any UI. Files that are unknown and potentially dangerous will be allowed to run because SmartScreen will not prompt the user for a decision, and if the user is offline all files will be allowed to be opened because Windows won't prompt the user to ask what to do. Firefox incorrectly sets this flag when downloading files, leading to less secure behavior from SmartScreen. Note: this issue only affects Windows 10 users running the April 2018 update or later. It does not affect other Windows users or other operating systems. This vulnerability affects Thunderbird < 52.8, Thunderbird ESR < 52.8, Firefox < 60, and Firefox ESR < 52.8. |
| CVE-2018-0986 | A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Microsoft Malware Protection Engine does not properly scan a specially crafted file, leading to memory corruption, aka "Microsoft Malware Protection Engine Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." This affects Windows Defender, Windows Intune Endpoint Protection, Microsoft Security Essentials, Microsoft System Center Endpoint Protection, Microsoft Exchange Server, Microsoft System Center, Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection. |
| CVE-2017-8558 | The Microsoft Malware Protection Engine running on Microsoft Forefront and Microsoft Defender on 32-bit versions of Microsoft Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, and 1703 does not properly scan a specially crafted file leading to memory corruption. aka "Microsoft Malware Protection Engine Remote Code Execution Vulnerability". |
| CVE-2017-8542 | The Microsoft Malware Protection Engine running on Microsoft Forefront and Microsoft Defender on Microsoft Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, and 1703, and Windows Server 2016, Microsoft Exchange Server 2013 and 2016, does not properly scan a specially crafted file leading to denial of service. aka "Microsoft Malware Protection Engine Denial of Service Vulnerability", a different vulnerability than CVE-2017-8535, CVE-2017-8536, CVE-2017-8537, and CVE-2017-8539. |
| CVE-2017-8541 | The Microsoft Malware Protection Engine running on Microsoft Forefront and Microsoft Defender on Microsoft Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, and 1703, and Windows Server 2016, Microsoft Exchange Server 2013 and 2016, does not properly scan a specially crafted file leading to memory corruption. aka "Microsoft Malware Protection Engine Remote Code Execution Vulnerability", a different vulnerability than CVE-2017-8538 and CVE-2017-8540. |
| CVE-2017-8540 | The Microsoft Malware Protection Engine running on Microsoft Forefront and Microsoft Defender on Microsoft Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, and 1703, and Windows Server 2016, Microsoft Exchange Server 2013 and 2016, does not properly scan a specially crafted file leading to memory corruption. aka "Microsoft Malware Protection Engine Remote Code Execution Vulnerability", a different vulnerability than CVE-2017-8538 and CVE-2017-8541. |
| CVE-2017-8539 | The Microsoft Malware Protection Engine running on Microsoft Forefront and Microsoft Defender on Microsoft Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, and 1703, and Windows Server 2016, Microsoft Exchange Server 2013 and 2016, does not properly scan a specially crafted file leading to denial of service. aka "Microsoft Malware Protection Engine Denial of Service Vulnerability", a different vulnerability than CVE-2017-8535, CVE-2017-8536, CVE-2017-8537, and CVE-2017-8542. |
| CVE-2017-8538 | The Microsoft Malware Protection Engine running on Microsoft Forefront and Microsoft Defender on Microsoft Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, and 1703, and Windows Server 2016, Microsoft Exchange Server 2013 and 2016, does not properly scan a specially crafted file leading to memory corruption. aka "Microsoft Malware Protection Engine Remote Code Execution Vulnerability", a different vulnerability than CVE-2017-8540 and CVE-2017-8541. |
| CVE-2017-8537 | The Microsoft Malware Protection Engine running on Microsoft Forefront and Microsoft Defender on Microsoft Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, and 1703, and Windows Server 2016, Microsoft Exchange Server 2013 and 2016, does not properly scan a specially crafted file leading to denial of service. aka "Microsoft Malware Protection Engine Denial of Service Vulnerability", a different vulnerability than CVE-2017-8535, CVE-2017-8536, CVE-2017-8539, and CVE-2017-8542. |
| CVE-2017-8536 | The Microsoft Malware Protection Engine running on Microsoft Forefront and Microsoft Defender on Microsoft Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, and 1703, and Windows Server 2016, Microsoft Exchange Server 2013 and 2016, does not properly scan a specially crafted file leading to denial of service. aka "Microsoft Malware Protection Engine Denial of Service Vulnerability", a different vulnerability than CVE-2017-8535, CVE-2017-8537, CVE-2017-8539, and CVE-2017-8542. |
| CVE-2017-8535 | The Microsoft Malware Protection Engine running on Microsoft Forefront and Microsoft Defender on Microsoft Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, and 1703, and Windows Server 2016, Microsoft Exchange Server 2013 and 2016, does not properly scan a specially crafted file leading to denial of service. aka "Microsoft Malware Protection Engine Denial of Service Vulnerability", a different vulnerability than CVE-2017-8536, CVE-2017-8537, CVE-2017-8539, and CVE-2017-8542. |
| CVE-2017-11940 | The Microsoft Malware Protection Engine running on Microsoft Forefront and Microsoft Defender on Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows RT 8.1, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, and 1703, 1709 and Windows Server 2016, Windows Server, version 1709, Microsoft Exchange Server 2013 and 2016, does not properly scan a specially crafted file leading to remote code execution. aka "Microsoft Malware Protection Engine Remote Code Execution Vulnerability". This is different than CVE-2017-11937. |
| CVE-2017-11937 | The Microsoft Malware Protection Engine running on Microsoft Forefront and Microsoft Defender on Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows RT 8.1, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, and 1703, 1709 and Windows Server 2016, Windows Server, version 1709, Microsoft Exchange Server 2013 and 2016, does not properly scan a specially crafted file leading to remote code execution. aka "Microsoft Malware Protection Engine Remote Code Execution Vulnerability". |
| CVE-2017-0290 | The Microsoft Malware Protection Engine running on Microsoft Forefront and Microsoft Defender on Microsoft Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, and 1703, and Windows Server 2016 does not properly scan a specially crafted file leading to memory corruption, aka "Microsoft Malware Protection Engine Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." |
| CVE-2015-8286 | Zhuhai RaySharp firmware has a hardcoded root password, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain access via a session on TCP port 23 or 9000. |
| CVE-2014-5350 | Multiple directory traversal vulnerabilities in Bitdefender GravityZone before 5.1.11.432 allow remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a (1) .. (dot dot) in the id parameter to webservice/CORE/downloadFullKitEpc/a/1 in the Web Console or (2) %2E%2E (encoded dot dot) in the default URI to port 7074 on the Update Server. |
| CVE-2013-3154 | The signature-update functionality in Windows Defender on Microsoft Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008 R2 relies on an incorrect pathname, which allows local users to gain privileges via a Trojan horse application in the %SYSTEMDRIVE% top-level directory, aka "Microsoft Windows 7 Defender Improper Pathname Vulnerability." |
| CVE-2013-0078 | The Microsoft Antimalware Client in Windows Defender on Windows 8 and Windows RT uses an incorrect pathname for MsMpEng.exe, which allows local users to gain privileges via a crafted application, aka "Microsoft Antimalware Improper Pathname Vulnerability." |
| CVE-2011-0037 | Microsoft Malware Protection Engine before 1.1.6603.0, as used in Microsoft Malicious Software Removal Tool (MSRT), Windows Defender, Security Essentials, Forefront Client Security, Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010, and Windows Live OneCare, allows local users to gain privileges via a crafted value of an unspecified user registry key. |
| CVE-2010-5165 | ** DISPUTED ** Race condition in Malware Defender 2.6.0 on Windows XP allows local users to bypass kernel-mode hook handlers, and execute dangerous code that would otherwise be blocked by a handler but not blocked by signature-based malware detection, via certain user-space memory changes during hook-handler execution, aka an argument-switch attack or a KHOBE attack. NOTE: this issue is disputed by some third parties because it is a flaw in a protection mechanism for situations where a crafted program has already begun to execute. |
| CVE-2009-0850 | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in BitDefender Internet Security 2009 allows user-assisted remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the filename of a virus-infected file, as demonstrated by a filename inside a (1) rar or (2) zip archive file. |
| CVE-2008-6661 | Multiple integer overflows in the scanning engine in Bitdefender for Linux 7.60825 and earlier allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a malformed (1) NeoLite and (2) ASProtect packed PE file. |
| CVE-2008-5409 | Unspecified vulnerability in the pdf.xmd module in (1) BitDefender Free Edition 10 and Antivirus Standard 10, (2) BullGuard Internet Security 8.5, and (3) Software602 Groupware Server 6.0.08.1118 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted PDF file, possibly related to included compressed streams that were processed with the ASCIIHexDecode filter. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information. |
| CVE-2008-1735 | BitDefender Antivirus 2008 20080118 and earlier allows local users to cause a denial of service (system crash) via an invalid pointer to the CLIENT_ID structure in a call to the NtOpenProcess hooked System Service Descriptor Table (SSDT) function. |
| CVE-2008-0396 | Directory traversal vulnerability in BitDefender Update Server (http.exe), as used in BitDefender products including Security for Fileservers and Enterprise Manager (BDEM), allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via .. (dot dot) sequences in an HTTP request. |
| CVE-2007-6189 | A certain ActiveX control in (1) OScan8.ocx and (2) Oscan81.ocx in BitDefender Online Anti-Virus Scanner 8.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long argument to the InitX method that begins with a "%%" sequence, which is misinterpreted as a Unicode string and decoded twice, leading to improper memory allocation and a heap-based buffer overflow. |
| CVE-2007-5775 | Unspecified vulnerability in BitDefender allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors, aka EEYEB-20071024. NOTE: as of 20071029, the only disclosure is a vague pre-advisory with no actionable information. However, since it is from a well-known researcher, it is being assigned a CVE identifier for tracking purposes. |
| CVE-2007-0391 | Format string vulnerability in the log creation functionality of BitDefender Client Professional Plus 8.02 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via certain scan job settings. |
| CVE-2006-6627 | Integer overflow in the packed PE file parsing implementation in BitDefender products before 20060829, including Antivirus, Antivirus Plus, Internet Security, Mail Protection for Enterprises, and Online Scanner; and BitDefender products for Microsoft ISA Server and Exchange 5.5 through 2003; allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted file, which triggers a heap-based buffer overflow, aka the "cevakrnl.xmd vulnerability." |
| CVE-2006-6405 | BitDefender Mail Protection for SMB 2.0 allows remote attackers to bypass virus detection by inserting invalid characters into base64 encoded content in a multipart/mixed MIME file, as demonstrated with the EICAR test file. |
| CVE-2006-5406 | Passgo Defender 5.2 creates the application directory with insecure permissions (Everyone/Full Control), which allows local users to read and modify sensitive files. NOTE: the provenance of this information is unknown; the details are obtained from third party information. |
| CVE-2006-5270 | Integer overflow in the Microsoft Malware Protection Engine (mpengine.dll), as used by Windows Live OneCare, Antigen, Defender, and Forefront Security, allows user-assisted remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted PDF file. |
| CVE-2005-3154 | Format string vulnerability in the logging functionality in BitDefender AntiVirus 7.2 through 9 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code via format string specifiers in file or directory name. |
| CVE-2005-2298 | BitDefender Engine 1.6.1 and earlier does not properly scan all attachments, which allows remote attackers to bypass virus scanning via begin and end commands in the body of the e-mail, which BitDefender treats as a uuencoded attachment and stops scanning afterwards. |
| CVE-2005-1286 | Unquoted Windows search path vulnerability in BitDefender 8 allows local users to prevent BitDefender from starting by creating a malicious C:\program.exe, possibly due to the lack of quoting of the full pathname when executing a process. |
| CVE-2004-1947 | The AVXSCANONLINE.AvxScanOnlineCtrl.1 ActiveX control in BitDefender Scan Online allows remote attackers to (1) obtain sensitive information such as system drives and contents or (2) use the RequestFile method to download and execute arbitrary code via an object codebase that uses bitdefender.cab. |
| CVE-2004-0767 | NGSEC StackDefender 1.10 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (system crash) via an invalid address for the ObjectAttribues parameter to the hooks for the (1) ZwCreateFile or (2) ZwOpenFile functions. |
| CVE-2004-0766 | NGSEC StackDefender 2.0 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (system crash) via an invalid address for the BaseAddress parameter to the hooks for the (1) ZwAllocateVirtualMemory or (2) ZwProtectVirtualMemory functions. |
| CVE-2003-1527 | BlackICE Defender 2.9.cap and Server Protection 3.5.cdf, when configured to automatically block attacks, allows remote attackers to block IP addresses and cause a denial of service via spoofed packets. |
| CVE-2002-0237 | Buffer overflow in ISS BlackICE Defender 2.9 and earlier, BlackICE Agent 3.0 and 3.1, and RealSecure Server Sensor 6.0.1 and 6.5 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a flood of large ICMP ping packets. |
| CVE-2001-1431 | Nokia Firewall Appliances running IPSO 3.3 and VPN-1/FireWall-1 4.1 Service Pack 3, IPSO 3.4 and VPN-1/FireWall-1 4.1 Service Pack 4, and IPSO 3.4 or IPSO 3.4.1 and VPN-1/FireWall-1 4.1 Service Pack 5, when SYN Defender is configured in Active Gateway mode, does not properly rewrite the third packet of a TCP three-way handshake to use the NAT IP address, which allows remote attackers to gain sensitive information. |
| CVE-2000-0562 | BlackIce Defender 2.1 and earlier, and BlackIce Pro 2.0.23 and earlier, do not properly block Back Orifice traffic when the security setting is Nervous or lower. |
|
You can also search by reference using the CVE Reference Maps.
For More Information: CVE Request Web Form (select “Other” from dropdown)
|
||
