Search Results

There are 34 CVE Records that match your search.
Name Description
CVE-2023-46800 Online Matrimonial Project v1.0 is vulnerable to multiple Unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerabilities. The 'id' parameter of the view_profile.php resource does not validate the characters received and they are sent unfiltered to the database.
CVE-2023-46793 Online Matrimonial Project v1.0 is vulnerable to multiple Unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerabilities. The 'day' parameter in the 'register()' function of the functions.php resource does not validate the characters received and they are sent unfiltered to the database.
CVE-2023-46789 Online Matrimonial Project v1.0 is vulnerable to multiple Unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerabilities. The 'filename' attribute of the 'pic1' multipart parameter of the functions.php resource does not validate the characters received and they are sent unfiltered to the database.
CVE-2023-46788 Online Matrimonial Project v1.0 is vulnerable to multiple Unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerabilities. The 'id' parameter in the 'uploadphoto()' function of the functions.php resource does not validate the characters received and they are sent unfiltered to the database.
CVE-2023-46787 Online Matrimonial Project v1.0 is vulnerable to multiple Unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerabilities. The 'username' parameter of the auth/auth.php resource does not validate the characters received and they are sent unfiltered to the database.
CVE-2023-46785 Online Matrimonial Project v1.0 is vulnerable to multiple Unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerabilities. The 'id' parameter of the partner_preference.php resource does not validate the characters received and they are sent unfiltered to the database.
CVE-2023-30394 The MoveIt framework 1.1.11 for ROS allows cross-site scripting (XSS) via the API authentication function.
CVE-2022-48326 Multiple Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Mapos 4.39.0 allow attackers to execute arbitrary code. Affects the following parameters: (1) nome, (2) aCliente, (3) eCliente, (4) dCliente, (5) vCliente, (6) aProduto, (7) eProduto, (8) dProduto, (9) vProduto, (10) aServico, (11) eServico, (12) dServico, (13) vServico, (14) aOs, (15) eOs, (16) dOs, (17) vOs, (18) aVenda, (19) eVenda, (20) dVenda, (21) vVenda, (22) aGarantia, (23) eGarantia, (24) dGarantia, (25) vGarantia, (26) aArquivo, (27) eArquivo, (28) dArquivo, (29) vArquivo, (30) aPagamento, (31) ePagamento, (32) dPagamento, (33) vPagamento, (34) aLancamento, (35) eLancamento, (36) dLancamento, (37) vLancamento, (38) cUsuario, (39) cEmitente, (40) cPermissao, (41) cBackup, (42) cAuditoria, (43) cEmail, (44) cSistema, (45) rCliente, (46) rProduto, (47) rServico, (48) rOs, (49) rVenda, (50) rFinanceiro, (51) aCobranca, (52) eCobranca, (53) dCobranca, (54) vCobranca, (55) situacao, (56) idPermissao, (57) id in file application/controllers/Permissoes.php; (58) precoCompra, (59) precoVenda, (60) descricao, (61) unidade, (62) estoque, (63) estoqueMinimo, (64) idProdutos, (65) id, (66) estoqueAtual in file application/controllers/Produtos.php.
CVE-2022-48217 ** DISPUTED ** The tf_remapper_node component 1.1.1 for Robot Operating System (ROS) allows attackers, who control the source code of a different node in the same ROS application, to change a robot's behavior. This occurs because a topic name depends on the attacker-controlled old_tf_topic_name and/or new_tf_topic_name parameter. NOTE: the vendor's position is "it is the responsibility of the programmer to make sure that only known and required parameters are set and unexpected parameters are not."
CVE-2022-48198 The ntpd_driver component before 1.3.0 and 2.x before 2.2.0 for Robot Operating System (ROS) allows attackers, who control the source code of a different node in the same ROS application, to change a robot's behavior. This occurs because a topic name depends on the attacker-controlled time_ref_topic parameter.
CVE-2021-37146 An infinite loop in Open Robotics ros_comm XMLRPC server in ROS Melodic through 1.4.11 and ROS Noetic through1.15.11 allows remote attackers to cause a Denial of Service in ros_comm via a crafted XMLRPC call.
CVE-2021-31895 A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM ROS M2100 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS M2200 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS M969 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RMC (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RMC20 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RMC30 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RMC40 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RMC41 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RMC8388 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RMC8388 V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RP110 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS400 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS401 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS416 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS416v2 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS416v2 V5.X (All versions < 5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS8000 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS8000A (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS8000H (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS8000T (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS900 (32M) V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS900 (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS900G (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS900G (32M) V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS900G (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS900GP (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS900L (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS900W (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS910 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS910L (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS910W (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS920L (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS920W (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS930L (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS930W (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS940G (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS969 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2100 (32M) V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2100 (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2100 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2100P (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2100P (32M) V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2100P (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2200 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2288 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2288 V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2300 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2300 V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2300P V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2300P V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2488 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2488 V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG900 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG900 V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG900C (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG900G V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG900G V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG900R (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG920P V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG920P V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSL910 (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RST2228 (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RST916C (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RST916P (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS i800 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS i801 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS i802 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS i803 (All versions < V4.3.7). The DHCP client in affected devices fails to properly sanitize incoming DHCP packets. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause memory to be overwritten, potentially allowing remote code execution.
CVE-2020-16124 Integer Overflow or Wraparound vulnerability in the XML RPC library of OpenRobotics ros_comm communications packages allows unauthenticated network traffic to cause unexpected behavior. This issue affects: OpenRobotics ros_comm communications packages Noetic and prior versions. Fixed in https://github.com/ros/ros_comm/pull/2065.
CVE-2020-10289 Use of unsafe yaml load. Allows instantiation of arbitrary objects. The flaw itself is caused by an unsafe parsing of YAML values which happens whenever an action message is processed to be sent, and allows for the creation of Python objects. Through this flaw in the ROS core package of actionlib, an attacker with local or remote access can make the ROS Master, execute arbitrary code in Python form. Consider yaml.safe_load() instead. Located first in actionlib/tools/library.py:132. See links for more info on the bug.
CVE-2020-10272 MiR100, MiR200 and other MiR robots use the Robot Operating System (ROS) default packages exposing the computational graph without any sort of authentication. This allows attackers with access to the internal wireless and wired networks to take control of the robot seamlessly. In combination with CVE-2020-10269 and CVE-2020-10271, this flaw allows malicious actors to command the robot at desire.
CVE-2020-10271 MiR100, MiR200 and other MiR robots use the Robot Operating System (ROS) default packages exposing the computational graph to all network interfaces, wireless and wired. This is the result of a bad set up and can be mitigated by appropriately configuring ROS and/or applying custom patches as appropriate. Currently, the ROS computational graph can be accessed fully from the wired exposed ports. In combination with other flaws such as CVE-2020-10269, the computation graph can also be fetched and interacted from wireless networks. This allows a malicious operator to take control of the ROS logic and correspondingly, the complete robot given that MiR's operations are centered around the framework (ROS).
CVE-2019-19627 SROS 2 0.8.1 (after CVE-2019-19625 is mitigated) leaks ROS 2 node-related information regardless of the rtps_protection_kind configuration. (SROS2 provides the tools to generate and distribute keys for Robot Operating System 2 and uses the underlying security plugins of DDS from ROS 2.)
CVE-2019-19625 SROS 2 0.8.1 (which provides the tools that generate and distribute keys for Robot Operating System 2 and uses the underlying security plugins of DDS from ROS 2) leaks node information due to a leaky default configuration as indicated in the policy/defaults/dds/governance.xml document.
CVE-2019-13566 An issue was discovered in the ROS communications-related packages (aka ros_comm or ros-melodic-ros-comm) through 1.14.3. A buffer overflow allows attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code via an IP address with a long hostname.
CVE-2019-13465 An issue was discovered in the ROS communications-related packages (aka ros_comm or ros-melodic-ros-comm) through 1.14.3. ROS_ASSERT_MSG only works when ROS_ASSERT_ENABLED is defined. This leads to a problem in the remove() function in clients/roscpp/src/libros/spinner.cpp. When ROS_ASSERT_ENABLED is not defined, the iterator loop will run out of the scope of the array, and cause denial of service for other components (that depend on the communication-related functions of this package). NOTE: The reporter of this issue now believes it was a false alarm.
CVE-2019-13445 An issue was discovered in the ROS communications-related packages (aka ros_comm or ros-melodic-ros-comm) through 1.14.3. parseOptions() in tools/rosbag/src/record.cpp has an integer overflow when a crafted split option can be entered on the command line.
CVE-2017-9347 In Wireshark 2.2.0 to 2.2.6, the ROS dissector could crash with a NULL pointer dereference. This was addressed in epan/dissectors/asn1/ros/packet-ros-template.c by validating an OID.
CVE-2017-12736 A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM ROS for RSL910 devices (All versions < ROS V5.0.1), RUGGEDCOM ROS for all other devices (All versions < ROS V4.3.4), SCALANCE XB-200/XC-200/XP-200/XR300-WG (All versions between V3.0 (including) and V3.0.2 (excluding)), SCALANCE XR-500/XM-400 (All versions between V6.1 (including) and V6.1.1 (excluding)). After initial configuration, the Ruggedcom Discovery Protocol (RCDP) is still able to writeto the device under certain conditions, potentially allowing users located in the adjacentnetwork of the targeted device to perform unauthorized administrative actions.
CVE-2016-10681 roslib-socketio - The standard ROS Javascript Library fork for add support to socket.io roslib-socketio downloads binary resources over HTTP, which leaves it vulnerable to MITM attacks. It may be possible to cause remote code execution (RCE) by swapping out the requested resources with an attacker controlled copy if the attacker is on the network or positioned in between the user and the remote server.
CVE-2015-7836 Siemens RUGGEDCOM ROS before 4.2.1 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information by sniffing the network for VLAN data within the padding section of an Ethernet frame.
CVE-2015-6675 Siemens RUGGEDCOM ROS 3.8.0 through 4.1.x permanently enables the IP forwarding feature, which allows remote attackers to bypass a VLAN isolation protection mechanism via IP traffic.
CVE-2015-5537 The SSL layer of the HTTPS service in Siemens RuggedCom ROS before 4.2.0 and ROX II does not properly implement CBC padding, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to obtain cleartext data via a padding-oracle attack, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-3566.
CVE-2014-2590 The web management interface in Siemens RuggedCom ROS before 3.11, ROS 3.11 before 3.11.5 for RS950G, ROS 3.12, and ROS 4.0 for RSG2488 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (interface outage) via crafted HTTP packets.
CVE-2014-1966 The SNMP implementation in Siemens RuggedCom ROS before 3.11, ROS 3.11 for RS950G, ROS 3.12 before 3.12.4, and ROS 4.0 for RSG2488 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device outage) via crafted packets.
CVE-2013-6926 The integrated HTTPS server in Siemens RuggedCom ROS before 3.12.2 allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended restrictions on administrative actions by leveraging access to a (1) guest or (2) operator account.
CVE-2013-6925 The integrated HTTPS server in Siemens RuggedCom ROS before 3.12.2 allows remote attackers to hijack web sessions by predicting a session id value.
CVE-2012-4698 Siemens RuggedCom Rugged Operating System (ROS) before 3.12, ROX I OS through 1.14.5, ROX II OS through 2.3.0, and RuggedMax OS through 4.2.1.4621.22 use hardcoded private keys for SSL and SSH communication, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and decrypt network traffic by leveraging the availability of these keys within ROS files at all customer installations.
CVE-2012-2441 RuggedCom Rugged Operating System (ROS) before 3.3 has a factory account with a password derived from the MAC Address field in a banner, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain access by performing a calculation on this address value, and then establishing a (1) SSH or (2) HTTPS session, a different vulnerability than CVE-2012-1803.
CVE-2012-1803 RuggedCom Rugged Operating System (ROS) 3.10.x and earlier has a factory account with a password derived from the MAC Address field in the banner, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain access by performing a calculation on this address value, and then establishing a (1) TELNET, (2) remote shell (aka rsh), or (3) serial-console session.
  
You can also search by reference using the CVE Reference Maps.
For More Information:  CVE Request Web Form (select “Other” from dropdown)